Swallowtail: Flat or Sharp? (European swallows)

In the Swallowtail Reel, the second, fourth and sixth measures of the A-Part start with this figure (in A dorian, one sharp): 3(Bcd e#f… That makes it a c-natural, of course.

Now, I am learning it from a source (L.E. McCullough 121 Session Tunes) that has the second, fourth and sixth measure of the B-Part go like this: 3(B**#c**d e#f… Notice the c-sharp. I like this key change, which is I guess from A dorian to A mixolydian. But I was listening very hard at the session this week and everybody else seemed to be playing c-sharp also in the A-Part. It’s difficult to hear just a little passing third of a triplet in a ripping reel, though…

I am wondering, which way is right? (Translation for the right/wrong impaired: How did Seamus Ennis play it?)

I am wondering, which way is right?

Whichever way is right for you! The issue is that in the context of the tune, C-nat is more logical, but c# is easier. The point is, as you say, it’s a passing note. At reel tempo, most people would be very hard pressed to tell the difference. So you won’t hear a modulation, let alone a key change.

On 2002-01-25 10:27, StevieJ wrote:

I am wondering, which way is right?

Whichever way is right for you!

Ha! That’s funny, coming from you Steve! :smiley:

I realize that it’s easier on the whistle to play the c-sharp, but what is it like for say fiddles and concertina’s? Maybe their “lazy” version is c-nat.

I am curious because played at a slower rate the flavor is really quite different, and without the modulation the tune seems much less interesting. That change to the brighter c-sharp give the tune a contrast, despite the fact that A and B parts are quite similar otherwise. Maybe Peter L will point us to a definitive shellac recording by John Doherty or Mrs. Crotty or Tommy Potts. :slight_smile:

On 2002-01-25 09:39, Bloomfield wrote:
How did Seamus Ennis play it?)

On the pipes a triplet like that would always be a ‘tight’ triplet which would make the c sharp and that’s how ennis did it.

A while ago I transcribed Martin Rochford’s version of the tune which he got from Johnny Doran, for the journal of Na Piobairi Uilleann, quite distinct and quite nice on the pipes as well as the whistle.

(for everybody else, sorry about the aside : I have been talking about Rochford to Bloomfield even though there were no definitive shellac thingumies there were MP3s available :slight_smile:)

[ This Message was edited by: Peter Laban on 2002-01-25 11:20 ]

There’s a huge discussion about this sort of thing going on right now on the IRTRAD-L list. From what I’ve gathered (and I don’t know that much music theory), in tunes where the use of Cnat/C# and also Fnat/F# is somewhat ambiguous (both are used, or different settings of the same tune may have one or the other listed as “correct”), this probably means that it was a “supernatural” note, i.e. a note between the sharp and flat somewhere. This makes more sense on an instrument like the fiddle where you can hit inbetween notes. I think this is probably also related to the discussion on our board obout JUST and EQUAL tunings…

Very interesting topic, but a bit over my head thoery wise…

-Brett

On 2002-01-25 10:56, Bloomfield wrote:
Ha! That’s funny, coming from you Steve! > :smiley: >

Explain!

I still think it’s whatever’s right for you. If you like the way it sounds when Ennis plays it, or Doherty, or anyone else, go for it. If you don’t, nobody is forcing you to play it that way. You can easily leave the c# or c-nat out altogether. Or leave the B out, if you want.

Have you read Tomas O Canainn’s book Traditional Music in Ireland? He has a chapter or two of theory about the tonal characteristics of tunes, including a few observations about inflection, which touches on what we’re talking about here. Rather academic, but worth reading and chewing over. (And then swallowing or spitting out - whichever you like.)

Peter, very intersting about the “tight” triplet on the pipes. I was sitting next to Tony Morris on the pipes and it was mostly him I was hearing. Sitting there was interesting for another reason: He was playing a concert pitch full set (3/4 set actually: One of his regulators was being fixed), and between tunes I started asking him about fingerings, why and when you pick the chanter from your thigh and how Ennis used that to accent the upper octave D, the tuning of the regulators and the drones. What an education! And that is saying nothing about his excellent playing…

On 2002-01-25 11:16, Peter Laban wrote:

A while ago I transcribed Martin Rochford’s version of the tune which he got from Johnny Doran, for the journal of Na Piobairi Uilleann, quite distinct and quite nice on the pipes as well as the whistle.

(for everybody else, sorry about the aside : I have been talking about Rochford to Bloomfield even though there were no definitive shellac thingumies there were MP3s available > :slight_smile:> )

Thanks again for that Peter, much appreciated as you know. If I could now prevail on you to post an ABC of Rochford’s swallowtail, that would be great. How fast/slow did he play it?

Brett, thanks for the tip about the IRTRAD-L dicussion. I used to be on there, but dropped out when I was inundated with stuff I couldn’t comprehend. I’m a bit further now, so I think I’ll check it out.

On 2002-01-25 11:27, StevieJ wrote:
Explain!

There were several discussions here in the past that pitted the party of “It’s-folk-there-is-no-right-or-wrong” against the party of “You-can-do-as-you-like-but-don’t-call-it-IrTrad”. You were firmly in the latter camp, maintining that there were right or wrong ways of playing things, like playing a jig completely straight is WRONG , etc. (Remember your annecdote about the street musician on Brother Steve’s?) I am actually with you on this issue, and have great respect for your insight.

So, getting a “Play it how you want” from you is interesting and instructive, and also funny.

I’ll try and check out that book. So far I’ve only been listening and haven’t read anything about IrTrad apart form liner notes and chiffboard wisdom…

On 2002-01-25 11:20, Bretton wrote:
There’s a huge discussion about this sort of thing going on right now on the IRTRAD-L list. From what I’ve gathered (and I don’t know that much music theory), in tunes where the use of Cnat/C# and also Fnat/F# is somewhat ambiguous (both are used, or different settings of the same tune may have one or the other listed as “correct”), this probably means that it was a “supernatural” note, i.e. a note between the sharp and flat somewhere. This makes more sense on an instrument like the fiddle where you can hit inbetween notes. I think this is probably also related to the discussion on our board obout JUST and EQUAL tunings…

Very interesting topic, but a bit over my head thoery wise…

-Brett

The note we were talking here was a mere passing note in a triplet. The issue of the flattened seventh in Irish music is a horse of a different colour, I prefer to refer to these notes by the way as C or F ‘neutral’ : somewhere in between.

Tomas O Canainn's book Traditional Music in Ireland I just requested this through Inter-Library Loan so hopefully I'll get a chance to take a look at it. The note we were talking here was a mere passing note in a triplet. The issue of the flattened seventh in Irish music is a horse of a different colour, I prefer to refer to these notes by the way as C or F 'neutral' : somewhere in between.

Your’re right, and ‘neutral’ does sound like a better term. :slight_smile:

A neat thing my whistle teacher mentioned to me at my last lesson was when playing a B-C-D triplet you can use this fingering:

xox ooo for the B (a little off, but not too noticable) and if you leave the left hand 1st finger down just a millisecond too long before going to the C natural (oxx ooo), you’ll get a little blip of a G in there which sounds kinda cool. Sounds like you’ve cutt the C natural on the way up.

-brett

The issue of the flattened seventh in Irish music is a horse of a different colour, I prefer to refer to these notes by the way as C or F ‘neutral’ : somewhere in between.

Interesting topic. I was just wondering about this issue at a session the other day where some tunes were actually being played in what sounded like a different mode than they appear in print. Nuetral is probably a good way to describe it. Some might just say “out of tune” :wink:

For me, listening and watching carefully in sessions, it appears that there is a wide range of technical ability and perceptual maturity on the part of the players

(e.g. some advanced players are actually hearing these passing tones more flat or sharp than others and playing what they hear, and some are simply able to play more in tune than others).

But there is an additional wrinkle, which is quite interesting because it also affects how traditional music gets passed down aurally from generation to generation. The instruments themselves. Whistle craftsmen aren’t even in agreement as to how to voice this note!

If I play the same fingering for C natural as the person next to me, there’s an amazing chance that C natural (in particular) won’t be in tune between two players (even though other notes are).

One common fingering for C natural is oxx ooo (or some variation like oxx xxo). The plain fact is, this note is simply out of tune on a number of whistles by various craftspeople in all price ranges. There is no published standard for whistle makers on where to voice this note, so the results are (a) either an equal temperament flat 7th on the tuner, or (b) some random voicing that reflects the craftsman’s personal ear and technique.

To complicate matters further, there is also a completely different and accepted fingering for C natural: to half-hole the C# tone hole.

The half hole technique at least takes the whistle makers out of the equation and leads us to the cultural and perceptual issue of where the sound of that C natural is supposed to sit (if you are listening to excellent players, that is). The half hole technique for the C nat is actually closer to what is going on with the fiddle, since placement is an educated guess based on ear and experience. A bigger C# hole allows the greatest degree of flexibility, but of course also the biggest possibility for error. You need to be really GOOD (e.g. having practiced quite a bit) to play this note in tune consistently with others (even as a passing tone). So where is the note supposed to sit?

In my experience, the really good Irish musicians who understand the folk roots of the tradition are playing the C natural in a place that is slightly sharp relative to what you might think of in western rhythm and blues, or in a film score (like Titanic) for instance. (There is some scientific basis for this - a “high” 7th scale degree is more closely related to the natural overtone series).

But this note played as a natural overtone 7th intentionally by all the players in an average session? Doubtful. More likely, simply heard as C# again and again until newcomers aren’t even aware that at one time, the note was actually C natural.

Robert

On 2002-01-25 11:43, Bloomfield wrote:
There were several discussions here in the past that pitted the party of “It’s-folk-there-is-no-right-or-wrong” against the party of “You-can-do-as-you-like-but-don’t-call-it-IrTrad”. You were firmly in the latter camp, maintining that there were right or wrong ways of playing things, like playing a jig completely straight is WRONG, etc.

So, getting a “Play it how you want” from you is interesting and instructive, and also funny.

Bloomfield, you seem to be assuming that because I have said there are “wrong” ways of playing traditional music that I think there must be only one right way. This is so far off the mark it is NOT funny!

On 2002-01-27 14:33, rpmseattle wrote:
In my experience, the really good Irish musicians who understand the folk roots of the tradition are playing the C natural in a place that is slightly sharp relative to what you might think of in western rhythm and blues, or in a film score (like Titanic) for instance. (There is some scientific basis for this - a “high” 7th scale degree is more closely related to the natural overtone series).

This high C-nat is very noticeable in the playing of Cape Breton fiddlers. Scottish fiddler Alisdair Fraser has wittily dubbed it the “C supernatural”!

The fact that the fiddle allows the player to pitch a note exactly where he or she wants to is just one of many reasons why many people, me among them, consider it the king of instruments. Many older-generation fiddle players used natural thirds and sevenths that gave their music a unique spine-tingling tonal quality that other instruments can never match.

But to get back to C-nat: it is an especially important note in Irish music as the “vinegar note” in the D mixolydian scale, exploited to such great effect by uilleann pipers. Whereas C-nat tends to be a very weak note on the whistle, on the pipes it is strong, and a piper friend once showed me all the variant fingerings that pipers such as Séamus Ennis would use to sound the note, with different tonal qualities and gradations of pitch to suit their purposes in a given tune or passage in a tune.

But all these subtleties and possibilities for being out of tune that you mention: in your average session, there is often little room for such niceties. If people could be in perfectly in tune on other notes, there might be reason to worry about the exact pitch of your C-nat!

But when you’re playing in duets or small ensembles, these considerations are worth paying attention to.

At one period I played fiddle regularly with a very expressive uillean piper, and I learned to adjust my intonation to match the pipes in various places (sharpening my low E, shifting the C-nat to bring into tune with whatever he was doing on a long note, for example).

As a whistler playing with a fiddler, I would try to adjust my C-nats, “neutral” Fs and so on, to him or her (if I like what he or she was doing).

Of course when you play with fixed-pitch instruments such as accordians, you haven’t much choice but to fit in.

But solo, you can do what you like best.

So how subtle you can get about these matters, I think, depends entirely on the context you are playing in.

I must say that tuning has become a bugbear for me ever since I switched to whistle from fiddle (because of an injury). Playing fiddle, I could always adjust to whatever was going on. But when I just cannot get my whistle in tune with another whistler or flute player in a session, I often have to stop playing. There may be such a thing as “nicely out of tune” but there’s nastily too!

On 2002-01-27 20:23, StevieJ wrote:

Bloomfield, you seem to be assuming that because I have said there are “wrong” ways of playing traditional music that I think there must be only one right way. This is so far off the mark it is NOT funny!

I see your point. I just hope you weren’t offended by my levity. :slight_smile:

Do you remember the long set of reels starting (and ending) with Toss the Feathers on Burke’s If the Cap Fits? That is in my mind a prime example of what a master of the traditional fiddle can do with pitch and tuning. I have known classically trained musician wince during some of the middle tunes, and I think it is because of what Burke dues with the tuning.