OT: Important if you are interested in current politics/west

On 2002-11-24 20:57, jim_mc wrote:
All that being said, I still don’t buy Bin Laden’s letter. If he really meant all of the religious rhetoric he surrounded his venom with, the letter would have come before the attack.

Jim

Interesting point, Jim. It’s also of note that this letter (released by a British newspaper) hasn’t been authenticated, validated, anything-ated as being from OBL. It’s origin is an email circulated to websites sympathic to his “cause”. Doesn’t follow his usual grandstanding tactics of preparing a release to Al-Jazeera.

Even if it had, the idea of taking one word of the contents seriously is beyond logic. I’m not saying that some of the accusations have a basis in some fact, but that the goals and demands are incomprehensible. It’s no more than another rambling in a long list of flavor-of-the-month condemnations of the West. His positions have been ever changing, continuously evolving and layering. You only need look at his activities over the past 20 years in Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Sudan, and Somalia to see that he needs an enemy, any enemy, to espouse his fanatical beliefs towards and to direct his venomous form of religious domination.

Chuck said it best - just another holy killer and I too only want to hear his death rattle.

Teri

the original thread I got this from (on another board), one of the kids actually had something intelligent to say on the matter:

I actually empathise with some of the things he says, but he’s looking at the world through a very small frame of mind. He’s seeing things happening and people dying in the Middle East and Africa, and blaming the entire West for not digging them out of the hole they created for themselves through corruption.

Bottom line: Someone tell bin Laden that charity begins at home.

I think that’s about the extent of it…

[ This Message was edited by: TelegramSam on 2002-11-24 21:35 ]

Bush immediately apologized for the
word ‘crusade,’ in fact; and he has
spoken out strongly against members
of the religious right who have
attacked Islam.

I don’t believe it’s widely known here
in the USA that, after the Camp David
debacle, Israeli and Palestinian negotiators
met 50 more times. Israel made some
creative new proposals; the Palestinian
negotiators responded by saying that
they were willing to compromise on the right
of return (“It won’t be a deal breaker.”)
The two sides were much
closer to a peace agreement when Sharon
took office and called off the negotiations.

Sharon’s party (Likud) has as its
platform that there will never be a
Palestinian state. Sharon, long a vocal
opponent of the Oslo Accords, came to
office determined to destroy the peace
process and to expand the settlements.
He’s succeeded, with our aquiescence.

It’s by now pretty plain what needs to
be done to end the conflict, and the USA
has the leverage to do it–we fund the
Palestinians and we give Israel 3 billion
a year, 2 of it in military aid. The rub is that we will have to stand up
to Israel to do it, which means threatening to cut aid. The right wing in
Israel wants Israel to expand,
they’re in power, and words alone
won’t make the difference. George
Bush sr refused to sign loan guarantees
for new settlements and signaled that US
aid might not be forthcoming–that’s how
we got the Oslo Accords, in effect.
As soon as Israelis felt the economic
branch creak, the intransigent
Shamir was out of office, replaced
by the dovish Rabin.
But it’s very dangerous politically for
an American president to stand up to
Israel (this may be part of the reason
Bush sr lost the next election, at least
in the eyes of his son’s advisors), it takes political courage, and Bush jr isn’t going
to take that chance. That’s democracy.

Pretty much everything that’s
happening, from the war on terror, to
the terrorism itself, to the impending war
on Iraq flows at least partly from this
fact–the present administration, and
probably no administration, is going to
say no to Israel. This is largely for
domestic political reasons. The religious right sees Israel, and a
Greater Israel, as the fulfullment
of prophecy, and powerful Jewish lobbies, apparently more militantly
pro-Israel than most American Jews,
are heavily funding legislators
in both parties. Most of the rest
of Americans haven’t much of a clue
about what happens offshore.

Personally I’m
saddened to see our national life
turned upside down and our liberties eroded,
because of this. This mess should
have been ended a long time ago, on
grounds of justice and prudence.
I take it to be pretty
obvious by now that the Israeli-Palestinain
conflict is a luxury the world can no
longer afford. We have the
leverage to force a just solution,
we would certainly be joined in our
efforts by
the Europeans,
and if we did so it would cut off the
terrorists at the knees
–even though their
maximalist demands would remain unsatisfied.
The problem would be halved or more
in one stroke, I believe.
An operative sentence in OBL’s letter:
‘If Sharon is a man of peace in
Bush’s eyes, so are we men of peace!’

The alternative is what is happening
now. Best to all,

I live in a part of the US with a huge federal presence. Also here are many self-proclaimed Christians who can’t wait for the US to attack Iraq. My heart is very heavy, and then I find this thread with so many open minded replies. This message board is a kind of cultural oasis for me, and I am grateful that religion and politics may be peacefully spoken here.
Lisa

Blow’em all the hell up and let God sort them out !

That about sums it up…

Mojjo

…like I was saying…(see “froms” for last two posters)

On 2002-11-24 23:25, Mojjo wrote:
Blow’em all the hell up and let God sort them out !

Which is an apt, however approximative, translation of Simon de Monfort historical formula to leave the city of Albi to rape, ransack and flames at the end of a particularly sad Crusade.

Why don’t people just leave god alone when they’re just filling their own vacuity with brawl and money ?

‘Blow em all the hell up and let God
sort em out’ is a bit too close to
OBL’s way of operating for me.
People who say this often seem to
suppose that we’re the ones who
will do the blowing up.
Invites return mail.

‘Of all the gifts that God could gie
us, to see ourselves as others see us.’
We are the most innocent people
on earth.

If we wish the world to be a more peaceful and secure place we must understand all sides. We must listen evaluate and argue our point. We may find we have to take vigorous actions to defend our way of life but we should do that out of knowledge not fear and ignorance.
Every life is precious, as long as we approach the world people as our brother and sister rather than assuming that those we do not know are sub human we will be ok.
Those who look for the easy answers to serous problems will only find themselves creating more serious problems and perpetuation the cycle of mistrust and violence.

I know that we sometimes like to share our thoughts about more than whistles and guacamole here, but I really don’t think that C&F is the place for such a discussion.

I’m chafing at the bit to enter it, but am managing to control myself so far as a matter of principle.

Roger, Roger. 5 or 5. Pulling out.

All I have to say on this subject is, where I live we are on/under a practise bombing range, and for the last six weeks they have been getting ready to kick some serious bottie.
:sunglasses:
The Wiz

On 2002-11-24 19:39, Zubivka wrote:

…Crusades are a shameful part of our western history. Crusades led to the massacre of Frenchmen by Frenchmen in France, of Russians and Balts by the Prussian, of Byzantine Christians by Roman Christians. And of course to the massacre of Muslims by same Christians in Middle East. This led to the total cultural split between Europe and the Muslim world for centuries.
Incidentally, Crusades were a Catholic way of shooting oneself in the foot, since Byzance pretty well managed to resist the Turks before the Crusaders first destroyed this Second Rome…

Thank for pointing this out. It appears the main difference between Christians and Muslims in this respect is that Christians have progressed beyond the need to slaughter everyone who doesn’t share the religious beliefs. Muslims, on the other hand, appear to be just getting started.

When claiming Christians are worse than Muslims and couching your opinion in a historical context, you’d do well to point out that it was Muslims who first tried to impose their religion on Christians, not the other way around. Ignoring the 300 years of Christian/Muslim conflict that took place before the Crusades makes your argument disingenuous.

/TubeDude

On 2002-11-25 14:49, TubeDude wrote:
When claiming Christians are worse than Muslims

I did not.
And I said I’m out.

If anyone’s keeping score, don’t forget to add 1.5 million Armenian Christians under the Ottoman Empire to the Muslims’ bill - and that was this century. I’m not entirely sure about other historical numbers, but I think that’s a chart-topper.

JH.

I really liked the part in the letter about the Jews being in control of the banks and wall st. Oh, no! Watch out! :roll: The authors were starting to sound like skinheads for a second. :roll:

On 2002-11-25 15:51, jeffmiester wrote:
I really liked the part in the letter about the Jews being in control of the banks and wall st.

The same cospiracy theory that serves one extremist group serves another.

Yeah, I mean really, can’t they come up with anything new? :roll:

While I agree with some of what has been said, I respectfully disagree with other things that have been said, and in other cases I am having a hard time understanding and would like some clarification so I may understand better. If you can’t stand religion, then you might not want read any further.

What is going on in the Middle East is all about religion, in fact I would go as far as saying it is of biblical proportions for that is where this ancient conflict is rooted; clear back to Genesis. It is my understanding that many of the Muslims of this region claim decent from Abraham. When Abraham and his wife, Sarah, found themselves childless, Sarah gave her Egyptian handmaid to Abraham so that at least Abraham could have an heir. So Abraham had a son named Ishmael with the handmaid, Hagar. Then later, he ends up having a son, Issac, with his wife Sarah. The Lord said to Abraham that Issac will be the heir and that he (God) would establish his convenant with Issac and his descendants. Ishmael would not be heir or partaker of this convenant, but the Lord said that he would bless Ishmael in so much that his seed would create another large nation. There was contention between Hagar and her son against Sarah and Issac because of this and Hagar and Ishmael ended up being cast out. There are Muslims that claim their ancient father, Ishmael, had his birthright unjustly taken from him. Thus, they hate the Jews and lay claim to the land of Israel which they see as their proper inheritance, but the Jews see that land as their inheritance given to them by God. It may sound silly to have such conflict today stemming from something that happened so long ago, but they take it very seriously and there are those on both sides who are more than willing to die for their causes.

The extreme Muslims take it so far as not only wanting the whole land of Israel to themselves, but they see anyone who does not share their religious viewpoints as their mortal enemy. They see it as their “God given” duty to spread their religion though out the world by all means necessary, even by force and violence. If you don’t agree with them then you are an infidel in league with the devil in their minds, and they have no problem with killing infidels or blowing themselves up to kill infidels which, in their minds, furthers their cause.

These extremists are often referred to as suicide bombers when they blow themselves up in an effort to kill others. Strange term in my mind. They aren’t suicidal, if they were depressed and wanted to commit suicide, there are many fine buildings to jump from. They are however, very determined, willing to die for what they see as the greater good. Admittedly, their idea of greater good is quite distasteful to much of the rest us. I’ve heard people call these extremists insane for blowing themselves up, for dying as they do. But don’t we all have something we are willing to fight and die for. Our family? Our freedom? Our country? Our home and land? Our self preservation? And with some, even money? It’s a fickle soul indeed who can think of nothing that they would be willing to fight and die for. Some things are worth dying for, as many of those who have fought and even died for the freedoms we enjoy in our country know all too well.

Many have died protecting our freedoms so that we might have the choice to worship or not, as we choose. The freedoms to speak our minds, to have the freedom to disagree. The freedom to choose for ourselves our own path in life. I believe, in my religion, that there was a war in heaven fought over this freedom to choose. God held a great council, to prepare a way for those who went to earth to be able to return to His presence. Satan volunteered basically saying send me and I will force everyone be good at all costs and not one soul will be lost. One third of the entire host of heaven agreed with him. Then Christ stood up saying send me and I will do whatever God asks me to so to help make a way possible. Satan and his third was cast out because the real God does not force everyone to follow him. I believe this life was supposed to be about choosing the best we could what path we would take to prove if we were worthy of the blessings in store in the next life. We had learned all we could in the spirit world and now it was time for the final exam to see if we could move on to the next grade so to speak. Why do I mention this? Because I see it laughable when the extreme Muslims refer to us here in America as the great Satan. We have the freedom to choose our beliefs here in America; that freedom of choice is as God would have it, even if some of the choices we make aren’t that great. We might be a country with some problems but we aren’t at Satan’s level yet. Satan is the one who wants to force and control everyone and everything no matter the cost. The extreme Muslims are the ones who desire to force their religion on others at the point of death, which is much like Satan’s plan. Tragically, terrible things have been done in the name of religion. They thought they were doing God’s will, but were deceived. Anyhow, that’s what I believe.

As for OBL and his supporter’s demands: stop supporting Israel, remove of the sanctions against Iraq, and remove of U.S.'s military bases in the region. Going back on this I would agree with much of what has been said on the following basis. I’m tired of seeing our troops being spread out all over the world as if they were some kind of world police force. I would like to see most of our troops brought home to build up more defense here at home. We should only be in other country’s at the invitation of that country because they asked for our help. Unfortunately that is not likely going to happen not only because of the choices our government makes, but because of our ties to the United Nations. We (along with other countries) have a deal with them that we supply them with so much money, arms, and soldiers. The UN then takes these supplies and the soldiers and uses them as they see fit, even sending them places where they have little business being. A good number of our armed men and women are in fact not serving under the American flag, under an American general or sergeant. They are “on loan” for a time to the UN and during that time are under UN jurisdiction. They are accountable to and report to the UN, not the US during that time. They serve wherever the UN sends them and serve under the command of foreign generals, sergeants. etc. And if they die they die as UN soldiers, for the UN’s cause, not as American soldiers fighting for America. As I understand it, we have bases in the Middle East not only because we want them there, but because the UN wants them there. The sanctions against Iraq are UN created sanctions, simply enforced with support from the US and others. The US might come out and say we should lift the sanctions which would help but that would only go so far… they could not be officially lifted until the UN approved and lifted the sanctions.

As for Israel. I don’t see Israeli children blowing themselves up in Palestinian markets at the height of rush hour in an attempt to indiscriminately kill everyone they can. Does Israel not have the right to defend themselves? Yes, perhaps they go too far in doing so at times. But what do you think would happen if we found ourselves in a similar situation? A group with an agenda who are willing to die for it. Who had been or felt that they had been dealt with unjustly. Say, they wanted the state of California and felt entitled to it somehow, wanted all US citizens to leave the state and hand it over to them. We of course say no. They send suicide bombers into American cities, down into the subways at rush hour, into malls during the crowded rush of the holidays, killing everyone they can regardless of age, race, or sex. 9-11 was bad enough. Imagine random suicide bombing happening here on a fairly regular basis, and the terror and strain the average person would feel trying to go about their daily activities. I’d imagine that the government would do everything possible to stop the bombings. That means targeting those who are responsible for the bombings. In an desperate effort to stop the bombings, there would surely be problems. Those that are supporting the bombings live among us, are hiding among those who are innocent. People wind up being unjustly targeted, even killed. Accidents, or the purposeful efforts of overzealous officials. Soldiers in the streets tying to protect the people in general, checking those who look suspicious. That’s what happens when the war is on your own turf.

Israel wanting more land? I think they should be grateful with what they have got. On the other hand, I think they should be allowed to have a place to live in and around Jerusalem. They have a claim to the land to. It is also my understanding that Israel asked for our help, and I think it’s okay if we give it. There are those in the middle east who hate Israel, who would like nothing better than to wipe the Jews there off the face of the earth. For the extremists who hate Israel’s Jews and all that support them, having a Palestinian state is not going to be enough. Removing our support and our military bases is not going to be enough. Lifting sanctions on Iraq is not going to be enough. They aren’t that interested in compromise. It’s like a real mean bully, that threatens you, wants your money, your lunch, and for you to do his homework or else. You give in and they want more. You give in more thinking it will appease them and they will be happy, but it’s not enough and they push you around and demand more. Totalitarianism is unbending. It takes what it can get by any means possible, then lies, manipulates, and threatens so it can get more shutting all else out. It’s goal is complete power and control enforced by torture, violence, and death. It’s evil, even if it disguises itself behind the face of something that claims to be good, as it often does. OBL’s extremist supporters have admitted that they want Israel and the Jews utterly gone. They want to spread their twisted ideology everywhere they can, whatever it takes. At some point you have to say no and stand up to the bully. The only other option is submission and I think death would be better than to simply submit to live forever under some OBL type of totalitarian regime.

On the other hand, I don’t like the idea of just going over there and forcing our hand either. It’s too much like jumping up and down on a hill of red ants for me. Yet something does have to be done. I don’t have any real answers to speak truly. I don’t think there are any pleasant answers to something like this. But I do wish that we would put more effort into planning to defend ourselves better instead of having our troops spread all over the globe. I hate war, but defending yourself is necessary. Yet it seems like there should be a better way of defending ourselves than aggressively blowing up Afghanistan. I wish that those in the Middle East could just learn to live in peace. I’ve heard it said that it’s going to take them loving their children more than they hate each other. But all I have is my wish of peace. I fear it’s going to get uglier before it gets better.

On 2002-11-24 17:59, MurphyStout wrote:
I think his level of hypocrisy is unbelievable. His own record on human rights, and women’s rights is abominable. He has absolutely no leg to stand on. I deem him one of the worst people to ever walk the earth (right up there with Hitler and Reagan)

Okay Stout, are you comparing Ronald Reagan to Hitler? If so I am a bit confused. I can think of presidents whom I would consider worse than Reagan, and even the worst presidents we’ve had can hardly hold a candle compared to how bad Hitler was, in my opinion. Am I missing something here? If so, I’d like to know where you are coming from on this so I might better understand. Thanks!

Gosh! Sorry here, I didn’t start out with the intention of rambling on so much. Was going to say even more, but I think I’d better stop here. I usually stay away from political discussions on the board, guess I’m making up for all the times I’ve kept my mouth shut.

So I will close by saying: I know that politics and religion can be real touchy hot topics. If I offend anyone by my views I apologize as my intention was not to offend, but only to add to the discussion. Please remember that what I’ve said is simply my opinion and I completely support the right of others to have their opinions as well. It was said and has been said before that C& F is not the place for such a discussion. If it were truly so, threads would be locked on a more regular basis. I actually appreciate the wide variety of topics we talk about here, not just about whistles but about everything. We are all (well mostly) adults here, and I like to think that we are civil enough to handle such a discussion. The topic clearly stated “OT: Important if you are interested in current politics/western conflict with the Muslim world.” So if there are people who don’t like talking politics or religion (generally the mention of one religion, in this case Muslims, leads to talking of other religions) then this thread can be skipped over. I’ve even seen it said before that just having the message on the board is bad enough. Perhaps. But you know what, I have been offended by some of the conversations, topics, jokes that have occurred on this board to (by topics that have not been politics or religion). Things that I thought were offensive or simply in poor taste. But I’m okay with that, because I respect the forum we have going here and the rights of others to talk about things that I may not like or disagree with. And when I run into a thread I don’t like, I don’t say take it somewhere else, I just try to not read it again. Works for me anyhow.

Peace be with you all,
:slight_smile: Sara

Thanks to TubeDude for making nearly the same point that I tried to make a few hours ago when the board wouldn’t let me through. A lot of commonly accepted views about the Crusades are the result of ignorance and historical revisionism. The Crusaders were as much in the right (while doing terrible things) as the Allies were (who also did terrible things), both defending Western Civilization from certain eradication by, after a long precedent of being attacked, going on the offensive. They did NOT go to kill Muslims just because they weren’t Christians. Otherwise why didn’t they kill Celts, Germans, Slavs, etc? All of these were converted, but not by the sword.