What am I missing here? How does this violate the commercial guidelines? You know, the ones I wrote.
Would the people who want MORE moderation kindly step to one side of the room and the people who want LESS moderation kindly step the other side of the room please? And then, like, get a running start and slam into each other in the middle?
I was not going to enter this but as you are asking and everybody seems to want a piece This](http://chiffboard.mati.ca/viewtopic.php?t=30817%22%3EThis) Thread posted 25 july generously aired the new business and website. The present thread was posted 28 july. The policy, the one you wrote:
You may post a message on the board that describes your business, avoiding competive language and claims of superior products and services, ONCE A MONTH (not more).
I don’t know what I was thinking either but at the time it seemed appropriate to post the link, having visited the busineess in question’s website three days before I wasn’t ready for another round.
I thank Blackhawk for editing out his grossly inappropriate remark , which was inaccurate and at the expense of someone not remotely involved in this forum. We had it out in PM. But it was a good lesson for christian adolescent seminarists what bitching and sniping really is. (and here was another one)
Appears to me that “grossly inappropriate remark” could also apply here
Is it wrong to describe him in exact terms he used to describe (OK I added the adolescent) himself in other threads while it’s OK for him to throw ‘bitches’ at people?