This is a Tech Talk about anything that doesn’t fit the other subjects, that doesn’t have potential for a whole thread. The other threads are:
- Windway shape
- Metal fatigue
- Whistle materials
- De blade, boss! De blade!
- A “Boring” subject
Let’s start this one with “Testing Methods”
Everyone knows (or surmises) that we makers all use sophisticated electronic gear to get our whistles perfectly in tune. I know this ain’t always so. My first test instrument, was a pair of Clarke whistles (C and D), and a pair of ears (mine). Blow 'em both and listen for beat frequencies! Pretty good, if the Clarke was perfect, but kind of difficult, 'cause I had to tape holes to be able to test all opens (only 3 fingers per whistle available! )
Next, I moved up to a Yamaha electronic synthesizer. Crystal-controlled, so right on WRT pitch, but the “test instrument” was still my ear. Subjective. Empirical. All those Bad Words that our “Engineering Is God” folk despise! I’m so ashamed!
Finally, I moved up to computers. Two of 'em. One runs a spectrum analyzer, the other a simplistic instrument tuner, that reads out the note and the exact frequency. And still, through all this, the very first high-C and high-D whistles I made, are perfect. Go figure.
A long time ago, in a C&F thread far, far away, somebody made the observation that the human ear is a highly-sophisticated instrument. What think you??
Cheers,
Bill Whedon
(edit 2 to change title)
[ This Message was edited by: serpent on 2002-10-28 17:48 ]
[ This Message was edited by: serpent on 2002-10-29 19:50 ]