Scientists: Humans in Americas earlier than had been thought

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20050705/sc_afp/britainmexico_050705191119

LONDON (AFP) - British scientists said they have found 40,000-year-old human footprints in central Mexico, shattering theories that mankind arrived in the Americas tens of thousands of years later from Asia.

The discovery was made in September 2003 near the city of Puebla, 130 kilometers (88 miles) southeast of Mexico City, said Silvia Gonzalez, from Liverpool John Moores University (LJMU), who led the team of researchers.

The footprints, which were found in an abandoned quarry close to the Cerro Toluquilla volcano, were subsequently studied and dated by a multinational team of scientists.

“The footprints were preserved as trace fossils in volcanic ash along what was the shoreline of an ancient volcanic lake,” Gonzalez said. “Climate variations and the eruption of the Cerro Toluquilla volcano caused lake levels to rise and fall, exposing the volcanic ash layer.”

She said the discovery challenges the traditionally held view that settlers first crossed the Bering Straits, from Russia to Alaska, at the end of the last ice age, around 11,500 to 11,000 years ago.

Evidence for this theory comes from “Clovis Points” tools used to hunt mammoths found in many locations in the American continent.

But the discovery of footprints provides new evidence that humans settled in the Americas as early as 40,000 years ago, Gonzalez said.

“We think there were several migration waves into the Americas at different times by different human groups,” she said.

Working with Gonzalez were LJMU colleague David Huddart and Matthew Bennett of Bournemouth University.

She said the early Americans would have been curious about the volcano erupting and walked across this new shoreline, leaving behind footprints that soon became covered in more ash and lake sediments.

The trails became submerged when the water levels rose again, so preserving the footprints.

Now as hard as concrete, the ash is used locally as a building material.

The team was able to see the footprints without carrying out any excavation as quarry workers had already removed between lake sediments that had been deposited on top of the volcanic ash.

Were they ape-like prints? Just wondering whether Bush’s direct lineage had been discovered, that’s all. :smiley:

Steve

And we’re just hearing about it?


The footprints, which were found in an abandoned quarry

Flintstones, meet the Flintstones.

She said the early Americans would have been curious about the volcano erupting and walked across this new shoreline, leaving behind footprints that soon became covered in more ash and lake sediments.

Ugh: Hey what this? New shoreline.

Grog: We go fish. Leave footprints in sand.

I think this proves that the Garden of Eden was in South America when there was just one continent.

The Bushes are of English descent. They are descended from the Mayflower pilgrims of 1620.

In the valley wherein floweth the Tigris, the Amazon, and the Euphrates rivers.

I stand corrected :blush:. The word “descended” seems somehow particularly apt…

Steve

There has been a lot of debate over the last couple of years about whether or not settlers from Europe arrived during the last Ice Age, several thousand years before the migration over the Bering land bridge. Climate models have shown that the North Atlantic was completely frozen over during winter months. Similarities between spear head types in Western Europe and Eastern Americas, plus dating of cave images and camp sites in the south eastern US tend to bear this out. The idea of several waves of immigration from multiple directions seems very likely.

djm

Probably some of Europe’s people came from over here, rather. Some come from Asia. Some come from Africa. Some come from America. Probably told old Madoc how to go. :wink:

I still don’t think there is any place in civilized discourse to call the President a monkey, chimp or ape.

That’s why he did it on Chiff & Fipple. :wink:

Well, yeah, Roger OKeefe called him “the monkey” yesterday and its on my mind. Especially since, like millions of other Americans, I happen to be related to the guy. I don’t appreciate it as an individual or as an American.

Who’s Roger OKeefe? :confused:

A fellow chiffer, Irish livin in Brussels. I joked with him about it, but it does get old.

Oh dear. A lot of us in the UK are conditioned by the way the irreverent cartoonist Steve Bell depicts W in The Guardian. Over here politicians are regarded as fair game and most of them take it in good part. I didn’t mean to cause offence.

Steve

What animals are Chirac, Schroeder and Blair portrayed as (or any others)? Thanks for well wishes. Without getting too worked up, I just wanted to make the point.

They’re fair game over here, too. The Bush/chimp comparison has been going on for years. For example:

There will always be those who find such to be humorous, and those who find it offensive. When it comes to politics, there has never been such a thing as “civilized” discourse.

John

Schroeder as depicted by an American cartoonist.




Thanks for well wishes. Without getting too worked up, I just wanted to make the point.

Week, while I may kid, from time to time about Mr. Bush, I do believe you have a very valid point on this matter.

Believe it or not, like a lot of my humour, this was originally unconscious: I was using what I assumed to be an American turn of phrase, the monkey/organ-grinder reference, to describe what a lot of people believe to be the real power relationship to be. But once I had it written I saw the added value and let it stand. I’m really quite a charitable person most of the time…

I know you are , Rog.
Best wishes,
W. :thumbsup:

I’m even heroically restraining the urge to take the title of this thread as a pretext for some questionable humour :smiley:

“Laugh-a while you can-na, monkey-boy!” - Dr. Emilio Lizardo
from The Adventures of Buckaroo Bonzai Across the 8th Dimension

Don’t know why. This quote keeps popping into my mind … :boggle:

djm