[quote]
On 2002-06-08 02:50, gcollins wrote:
Loren: once you played a Grinter awhile back as you were getting into flutes, I remember you saying that it was not as impressive as you had expected. I wonder if you played it today, if it would be different.
G.,
I doubt it G., my playing hasn’t improved much since then 
Seriously though, it’s not that the Grinter I played didn’t impress me, it’s just that the flute wasn’t what I expected. The Grinter I played is an earlier example of Michael’s work, more than 6 years old I believe and very likely the first flute Grinter ever sold here in the US - a friend of mine bought it from Mike while Grinter was travelling in the US, before he was much known for his flutes.
Anyway, this particular flute is beautiful, very impressive in terms of fit and finish. the flute is fairly thin and relatively light - quite comfortable in the hands. If I remember correctly the tone holes are fairly small and relatively closely spaced.
Personally, I found the flute extrememly easy to play when I tried it, even with the most beginnerish of embouchures which I had at the time, it was no problem getting a sweet tone out of it. I did however find the bottom couple of notes harder to hit - a bit weak. But then that’s where my lack of lip really showed, didn’t it? To be honest, of all the flutes I’ve tried, only the Copley was easier to play than this particular Grinter.
The reason I may have given the impression I was dissapointed is because I was expecting the “Kevin Crawford” sound to come out of this thing - You know, reedy, complex tone with plenty of volume. However, the flute I tried was just the opposite - very sweet and lyrical, and also relatively quiet when compared with the Healy and Copley (which I also had in the room at the same time).
It wasn’t just my playing ability, I had my friend (an accomplished player originally from Boston) play all three flutes, and here’s what I heard as the listener:
Healy: Loud, very woody and somewhat dry tone - quite unique. Excellent intonation, very solid bottom end.
Copley: Equally loud, with a rich, reedy, complex tone. Very fat sounding, solid low end. Beautifully trad tone and very well balanced overall
Grinter: Surprisingly quiet compared with the other two. (My commented after playing both the Copley and Healy “You’re going to blow me away at the sessions!” I assure you he wasn’t referring to my playing!) The flute’s tone was sweet, mostly on the purer side, with a bit of complexity, but little reediness or bark. Bottom end a little weak relative to the flutes high end.
Overall a very lovely sounding flute that I thought would be perfect for those times when you don’t need a cannon or buzz saw of a flute. So I wasn’t dissapointed, it’s just that the flute was so far away from Kevin Crawford’s recorded sound that I was left scratching my head wondering if Embouchure really accounted for so much difference in tone, or had Michael Grinter made some changes?
Honestly I’d love to have a really sweet sounding flute like the one my buddy has. And my buddly wouldn’t mind having a louder session flute in addition to the Grinter, which he dearly loves and wouldn’t part with.
Hope that clarifies 
Michael E.,
Sorry to hear about the beating you took on wall street! Yikes!
Tod,
Tough decision dude, good luck!
Loren