Yep ⦠I mentioned this a few months ago, and some people posted their results:
2.25 hz. I think I could dial it in a bit more with further attempts, but why bother. Iām happy with that score.
Yup. 1.95 with the help of a q-tip.
oops
sorryā¦
o wellā¦more useless cyberspace.
Not at all! It will be interesting to see more results.
Well, I got down to 0.375hz after 16.5 oz of 2002 merlot. (thus the unCHasRlike āHar,harā biz..)
The visual test is pretty interesting.
Wahh..I only got 1.5ā¦but Iām sure Iād a done better with one of those big old glasses of merlot. Iād feel better about it anyway. ![]()
I did the adaptive thing 3 times, and kept getting 1.05. Iām not sure I understand what itās supposed to mean (?).
djm
It means youāre a 1.05, obviously. Woo hoo! Hey, so am I. Woo hoo! ![]()
It also means you can detect the pitch difference between 500.00 Hz and 501.05 Hz. That amounts to 3.6 cents.
I was consistently getting 0.75 correct, but every time it went to 0.375 Iād get it wrong.
I got a 1.125. Thing I wonder is whether a loss of acuity that is normal to aging has much effect on this subtle pitch differentiation thing.
I confess that as the process advanced I would listen to some of them multiple times because it took that for my ears and brain to sync.
But itās a definite that high frequencies become less perceptible to aging ears, and that could effect results.
Well, there was the optional demographic info. There may be some info related to age/acuity that I didnāt investigate.
affect
(sorry, couldnāt resist)
djm
good catch too. Iām generally so aware of my vulnerability there I canāt type either of the possibilities without stopping to consider.
Fingers got ahead of brain. Not difficult. Clumsy as my fingers are.
As a display of humility, I wonāt even fix it.
I got a 1.125. Thing I wonder is whether a loss of acuity that is normal to aging has much effect on this subtle pitch differentiation thing.
I confess that as the process advanced I would listen to some of them multiple times because it took that for my ears and brain to sync.
But itās a definite that high frequencies become less perceptible to aging ears, and that could effect results.Well, there was the optional demographic info. There may be some info related to age/acuity that I didnāt investigate.
Probably so. Iāve read of high schoolers using a ring tone in class thatās at a high pitch that adults canāt hear.
1.3 something. Not too bad. Iām at work, so merlot is not an option. ![]()
T
It would have been interesting if there was a āsameā option. Is being able to tell if a pitch is high or low the same as telling if it is āoffā?