No, no, NO. Well, kind of. I mean, why would the colo(u)r(s) matter? And I saw nothing in the way of any kind of notice, so I’m at a bit of a loss as to what the heck Weeks is on about.
Kind of sad. I just saw a house that was bulldozed by the city. Not a bad area, but because it was unoccupied for 6 months down it went. Before it was plowed, asking price was $4500. I am sure the bank now owes the city cash for the cleanup. Yet they keep building cardboard houses, and they keep getting bigger.
Hamster, Denny. HAMSTER. No “P”. Anyway, screw that. You want doom? When people muse on the timber I’m getting out of my timbre flute. There’s your doom for yourself.
I’m sorry but this whole thread is misrepresented. The development is “Timbres at ELM Creek” not “Timbres at ELK Creek.” Elm Creek is obviously more pedestrian than Elk Creek. Gentrification? Hardly. Darn someone beat me to it!!
How do you know it’s not a hampster? It’s wearing a mask.
And maybe everyone is screened for vocal quality prior to buying in that subdivision.
Like the places where you have to be “55 or better” (emphasis mine.) Maybe in Timbres you have to be “A above middle C or better.”
Plus, I’ll note how I like the header on the builder’s site: “K Hovnanian: A family of builders” (emphasis not mine.)
What does it mean when you stress the word “of?”
Oh, but they did. They did. It was well-crafted and, aside from the spelling gaffe, a very tastefully done wooden sign, largish and almost sculptural, of good heft and built to last, the kind that sits on boulders to proclaim the subdivision, the lettering of which was in good-looking fonts and attractively understated - but not too meek - colors, standing out in high relief, with the background left natural and heavily sandblasted to emphasise its grain for a nice rustic contrast to the fine aspect of the text upon it. Somebody in the developer’s budget department shelled out, to be sure.