I think that article focuses more on the past (the 19th century) than the present (the modern Irish flute), RPereira. And doesn’t go far enough into how things changed over that period. Certainly flutes of Nicholson’s period were diabolical in tuning. At any pitch! They slowly got better in the Rudall Rose days, but still had their issues. And by the time we got to the Pratten’s Perfected era, they were making good progress working those issues out.
When we come up to date, we find a few makers still making what we could call “faithful” copies of the period flutes, and so yes, if you have such a flute, you can expect to have to learn some tricks to accommodate those deviations. But I’m imagining that most makers are striving to make flutes that can play in good pitch without the player having to sell their soul to the Devil to be able to play it.
But that’s not to say it’s easy. We can relatively easily deal with the overall scaling issues. The period flutes had to deal with the pitch of the period making its way north from around 420/430Hz to around 452/455Hz. Stupidly, the same flutes were expected to be OK at both ends!
We can see the effect of pitch by looking at the Scale Length of flutes over the period. I’ve made an attempt at that at this page: https://www.mcgee-flutes.com/CsharpEb.htm . You’ll see an early Clementi Nicholson kicks off the list at 264mm between the top finger hole and the Eb key hole, whereas a late Boosey Prattens comes in at 245mm. I can’t play the Nicholson acceptably at modern pitch, but the Pratten is easy.
Our job is easier since we’re only aiming at one pitch, 440Hz. But we face other challenges too, predominantly in the matter of human reach. Ideally our finger holes would be distributed along the lower half of the flute according to how many semitones lie between them. F# to G is one semitone, so holes 4 and 5 should be about half the distance of holes 5 and 6, which cover 2 semitones. And we shouldn’t see such a big gap as between holes 3 and 4 which is still only 2 semitones. But we can largely deal with that by changing the size of holes, and undercutting the holes upwards or downwards to minimise errors between the octaves. The 6-hole flute can’t be as well tuned as the Boehm flute (which gets around the issues by putting the holes where they should be, and using linkages to make them accessible), but it can be very adequate for practical purposes.
We have to be very careful with anything Rockstro reports as he had his own agendas which render a lot of his writing unreliable. Needing to open the F key to humour the F# note is possibly one of these, as I point out in https://www.mcgee-flutes.com/RockstroAnalysesRRflute.htm . Rockstro was trying to push an early Rudall & Rose up to Philharmonic pitch, which wouldn’t have been invented at the time that flute was made. But it didn’t suit his agenda to admit that. I make it always a habit to distrust Rockstro unless I can find another authority in agreement!
On the F key to sharpen the F# note, I find on my flute (my “Rudall Perfected” model) I can’t hear or see on the tuner any difference in pitch when I open the F keys. It might make more of a difference on a very small-holed flute.
All of the above being a long-winded way of saying you shouldn’t need to vent any keys to be able to play in good tune if you have a well-tuned modern flute.