The âWar on Fatâ isnât driven by the President, nor is he in a position of power where it is concerned.
The âWar on Fatâ is driven by interlocked industries: the multi-billion-dollar entertainment industry, the multi-billion-dollar weight-loss industry, and the health insurance industry, which makes the other two pale to insignificance in terms of the money, power, and influence it wields.
Thatâs why the fact that this development occurred in the entertainment industry itself is so enjoyably ironic: it represents rebellion âamong the ranks.â
It is a function of the entertainment industry, and the fashion industry, to draw attention to itself.
This is only a means of drawing attention - it is not a sign of any real change.
Have you seen the latest edition of Vogue? The fashion pictures have a âterrorist suspectâ theme. They are offensive to me, but I hesitate to say so, as it draws attention to them, out of all proportion to the offense.
For a long time now Iâve thought that fashion designers want bone thin models because they canât actually design for any other shape. They can only do straight lines.
So true, designers unable to improve normal people looks are not interesting. They only deal with the easy part of the job. They lack talent to deal with the hard part.
Madridâs is not an isolated case in Spain. Some models have publicly denunciated being fired from their agencies and lost some jobs for being too plump (for them âplumpâ is over 100lbs.) More and more catwalks here are concerned about the impact of this trend on teenâs minds. There are some medical regulations regarding minimun weight, complexion and so on.
Someone may call it inquisitive, but I prefer calling it healthy.
Nah-- itâs cause they save lots of fabric by making those skinny *ss dressesâŚ
As the husband of a wonderful, formerly plus size wife (down 80 lb post gastric bypass and still dropping), my consciousness about weight issues has really been raised. What I want to know is, who exactly are these designers trying to appeal to? Speaking as a guy, I find these emaciated looking models unappealing in the extreme! Most men Iâve ever talked to agree.
If you actually believe the TV, the movies, and the Priestesses of the Gnawed Bone, then you have to be skinny and attractive or youâll never be happy, never be employed, and never be loved.
Fortunately, none of these are true.
And on love in particular, when you love someone, you love them no matter what they look like or how their looks may change.
Human sexuality ainât quite as picky on looks as theyâd have you believe, either.
Finally, the last and biggest lie: theyâd have you believe that if you are fat you will die significantly sooner than if you lose weight. This is based on insuarance studies done in the 1950âs, and even then the results are rather creatively interpreted, as what the original numbers actually show is that people who have a sudden, significant change in their weight (either direction) have significantly higher mortality rates than those who do not.
Take me for instance, I have all the personality and allure of a very flatulent and acne encrusted Jabba-the-Hut, and yet my lovely bride of 20 years (on the 18th⌠hah! I remembered!) finds me attractive and irresistably sexy.
Iâve been checking. Studies are certainly more recent
than the 50s, however in 2005 the CDC acknowledged
that it had mistakenly inflated the mortality risks
associated with obesity, which needed to be
very significantly downgraded. Being overweight
may be less dangerous than being underweight.
Also there have been advances in treating
many of the conditions associated with
obesityâe.g. diabetes, cardio-vascular disease,
high cholesterol, high blood pressure. Also
there are questions about the definition of
âobesity.â
As things now stand it seems the obesity question
is in flux. Enormous controversy right now.
On the face of things, extremes in weight are not
a good idea.
âFinally, the last and biggest lie: theyâd have you believe that if you are fat you will die significantly sooner than if you lose weight. This is based on insuarance studies done in the 1950âs, and even then the results are rather creatively interpreted, as what the original numbers actually show is that people who have a sudden, significant change in their weight (either direction) have significantly higher mortality rates than those who do not.â
Uh ohâŚcan we even discuss this without having the thread locked?Guess weâll see.
Seriously James, Iâm surprised you believe what youâve written
Down graded how much? What is very significantly, exactly? If youâre going to quote studies, please be specific, otherwise itâs not useful.
Being overweight
may be less dangerous than being underweight.
Your opinion or from these studies? Define underweight and overweight with regards to your comment please.
there have been advances in treating
many of the conditions associated with
obesityâe.g. diabetes, cardio-vascular disease,
high cholesterol, high blood pressure.
Does that make being obese somehow healthier, the fact that some of the diseases it causes are now more treatable?
there are questions about the definition of
âobesity.â As things now stand it seems the obesity question
is in flux. Enormous controversy right now.
You state this as if it were a fact, a medical fact.
This thread is going to be locked any minute. Obesity has serious health implications and thatâs a fact. Whether you can get better treatment for high blood pressure, high cholesterol, heart disease, diabetes, etc. is completely beside the point. I certainly wouldnât accept having cancer with a light heart just because there are better treatments out there.