Research: Pursuit of a Grande Latte May Be Stirring Up ...

The thread on popcorn research motivated me to pull up this story. I suppose it may be legit research but… I high-lighted my favorite research discoveries.

washingtonpost.com
Pursuit of a Grande Latte May Be Stirring Up Gridlock

By Katherine Shaver
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, April 18, 2005; Page A01

Almost every morning for a decade, Roger Bratter has stopped at a Starbucks in Gaithersburg to sip a grande latte sans foam or a green tea and spend 20 peaceful minutes with the newspaper before heading to his auto repair shop.
Grabbing a cup at home, he said, just isn’t the same.
“Our kid’s got to go to school. My wife has to get to the Metro. I’ve got to get to work,” Bratter, 54, said during a 7:30 a.m. visit last week. “If I have to make [coffee] and clean it up, it’s just an extra stress factor.”
Minutes earlier, at the same Starbucks on Quince Orchard Road, Steve Elgin, 41, pulled into the drive-through. A venti latte once or twice a week takes the edge off his one-hour commute between Frederick and Gaithersburg.
“It gives me something to do on [Interstate] 270,” said Elgin, an executive in an insurance claims company.
The two men represent what one researcher says is evidence that the national craving for gourmet coffee may be adding mileage to the morning rush hour. And the numbers might be significant enough to complicate efforts to reduce traffic congestion, save fuel and reduce air pollution.
She calls it – what else? – the “Starbucks Effect.”
“If you see people replacing an in-home activity like brewing your own coffee with an activity that requires a new [car] trip, that’s not exactly the trend we’re looking for,” said Nancy McGuckin, a travel behavior analyst who used U.S. Department of Transportation data to develop her findings.
McGuckin built her thesis from the department’s National Household Travel Survey, a periodic study of about 70,000 households in which each member keeps a diary of comings and goings – who’s driving where, how far and for what purpose.
What McGuckin and two colleagues found in comparing the 1995 and 2001 surveys, the two most recent ones, was that 1.6 million new Americans tacked personal errands onto their commutes. Studies have long shown that errands are an integral part of the daily routine, especially on the way home from work, when arrival times are more flexible. Women continue to outpace men in these trips, shouldering most of the early-evening family tasks after leaving the office, such as grocery shopping and picking up children.
But the researchers also discovered that for the first time most of the growth in errands occurred during the morning commute – and far more men had joined in.
A closer look showed that many of those men had destinations more enjoyable than the dry cleaner. While younger men were sharing in more household-related errands such as ferrying children, older men were devoting many of their morning trips to coffee and such portable breakfast food as bagels.
The Starbucks Effect is, of course, not just about Starbucks, although Starbucks opened more than 4,000 locations worldwide between 1995 and 2001, the two years the travel researchers used for comparison.
In addition to its effect on mileage, the boom in on-the-go breakfasts has confounded attempts to forecast travel patterns, which are based on computer models that rely heavily on the predictability of the morning commute. Those models assume that people take the shortest, fastest routes to work, not the ones that necessarily lead past a doughnut shop.
“How do we predict future travel when commercial and social interactions like this can surprise us?” McGuckin asked.
Not everyone who has studied these trends is convinced that a change big enough to affect traffic patterns or pollution has occurred. Fast-food restaurants, after all, have catered to morning commuters since McDonald’s introduced the Egg McMuffin in the 1970s.
Alan E. Pisarski, author of “Commuting in America,” said that although McGuckin’s findings are noteworthy, he doubts that coffee-and-bagel-seeking commuters are running up much extra mileage. Most people don’t have to drive far out of their way for coffee, he said, and their engines probably remain warm enough during those relatively brief stops to prevent high-polluting “cold starts” – the engine ignitions at the beginning of trips that produce the dirtiest exhaust.
He said, however, that the increase in personal errands added on to commutes causes more congestion during peak travel times.
“It’s more of a problem from a traffic point of view than from anything else,” Pisarski said.
Ronald Kirby, transportation planning director for the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, said he sees problems only if commuters’ coffee addictions motivate them to pass up alternatives to driving alone. Carpools, along with bus and rail systems, usually frown upon – if not outright prohibit – eating and drinking.
“You have your radio and air conditioning, and having your coffee cup there is one more thing that makes you more inclined to drive,” Kirby said. “If that becomes a big deal, it just makes it a little hard to get people onto transit. But how big a factor it is, I just wonder.”
However, it’s no accident, restaurant industry analysts say, that commuters rarely have to wait to make a left turn to get their caffeine fix. Restaurants catering to the breakfast crowd usually make sure they’re on the right side of the street for the morning traffic flow. In some cases, Starbucks will have two locations across the street from each other to accommodate traffic patterns in both directions, company spokesman Alan Hilowitz said.
With 65 percent of the sales for Caribou Coffee coming before 10 a.m., the chain is creating more drive-throughs and simplifying menus to speed morning commuters through, said Michael Coles, president and chief executive of Minneapolis-based Caribou Coffee Corp.
“They still want to move along, but you get that coffee and turn your radio on, and that’s your 20 to 30 minutes in the morning,” Coles said. “It’s a commute that you’ve turned from something that had no pleasure at all to one that is now the best part of your morning.”

© 2005 The Washington Post Company

Hey, I work right across the street from that Starbucks. Many of my colleagues stop there, or at the other Starbucks off the opposite end of campus, every day on the way into work.

Me, I don’t get the Starbucks thing. I don’t like their coffee, especially at the prices the gouge for it. There were a limited number of coffee shops 10-20 years ago that served very good coffee, often in places with book cases or mellow entertainment, where one could actually relax. These have largely been driven out of business by soso coffee served in an inductrial atmosphere. I should have figured they’re also responsible for rush hour. :wink:

I was going to post that for me Starbuck’s coffee is [insert vitriol-laden descriptors here], but in keeping with the decorum of reasonableness and staying clear of ad hominem attacks, I’ll just say that I don’t like it, either.

But what does Starbucks have to do with gourmet coffee? :boggle:

You’re a quick one, Darwin.

Yes, but I’m not fast.

Darwin knows his coffee. Check out his web site.

Darwin, have you yet had the pleasure of drinking THE coffee? The one shat from rodents in Indonesia?

Kopi Luak!!! I’ve always wanted to try it.

BTW, the luak is a catlike animal. This from the Coffee Review:

"The Infamous Kopi Luak. Luak coffee is one of those snicker-rich stories beloved of newspaper writers and party raconteurs. This gourmet curiosity consists (ostensibly) of coffee beans that have been excreted by a smallish animal called a luak or palm civet after the luak has consumed (and digested) the coffee fruit that previously enveloped those beans. Apparently villagers in parts of Sumatra both gather the beans from wild luak excrement as well as feed coffee fruit to luaks kept in cages.

Owing to a production method that is clearly limited in volume, Kopi Luak is a rare coffee that demands by far the highest price of any coffee on the world market – currently around $300 per pound retail roasted.

Note that the luak-assisted method of picking and processing coffee is not so outlandish as it first may sound. Presumably the luak, like any good coffee picker, chooses only ripe coffee cherries to eat. And recall that in the classic wet method of coffee preparation, one step involves allowing natural enzymes and bacteria to literally ferment or digest much of the fruit from the beans.

Although the odor kopi luak produces while roasting dramatically reminds us of its intestinal journey from fruit to bean, the taste in the cup does not. The kopi luak I have tasted is a rather pleasant, low-key, full-bodied, earthy Sumatra coffee.

As for authenticity, I suspect that, amazing as it sounds, most kopi luak is actually produced as advertised. The beans in the lots I have examined are irregular in size and shape, have little nicks and nibbles taken out of them, and seem saturated with intestinal nuance rather than simply rubbed in it. Nevertheless, only the luak knows."

Hmmm. My cat’s litterbox doesn’t exactly inspire me beverage-wise.

Sure isn’t a Cat just a overgrown Rat..

Slan,
D. :wink:

I may not be a “coffee expert”, but my wife and I enjoy our americano’s (two shots of espresso) from the same machine that Darwin uses. Once we started to pull shots at home . . . well let’s say, we think Starbucks is the McDonald’s of the coffee world. They are okay in a pinch, but when you want to enjoy coffee/espresso with some depth and flavor try one of these local Seattle-area roasters:

Umbria
http://www.caffeumbria.com/ (simply awesome!)

Zoka
http://www.zokacoffee.com/

Vivace
http://www.espressovivace.com/intro.html

We used to drink the Perugia blend from Torrefazione, but after Starbucks bought’em, their quality fell flat . . . no consistency. I have a friend that works there, and swears they didn’t change anything. Too much of a coincidence. Like the Eagles sang back in the 70’s “call someplace paradise, and kiss it goodbye” . . . same goes for commercialism in the coffee world too.

As for Kopi Luak, I doubt I would like it enough to justify such obscene prices.

Getting back on topic . . .

My wife and I both work from home, so fortunately even when we do buy coffee somewhere away from home, it’s not on the way to or from work. So we can safely say we aren’t unnecessarily adding to pollution or adding to traffic problems. Besides, we enjoy the coffee better from our own machine better than most places we could buy from.

Isn’t a great machine? I’m afraid my roaster isn’t long for this world, though. The blower hung up on me a few days ago, although it started up again after I slapped it upside the head, and seems to have been okay during my last roast. Oh, well. If it dies, that’ll give me an excuse to think about the Alpenroast.

With the hot Texas summer not far off, I’ve come up with a sort of ice cream macchiato. It’s just a double shot, sweetened, with an equal amount of Häagen-Dasz vanilla melted into it. I generally go for the more traditional drinks, but this is really good. (At least, it is if you’re a white sugar addict, like me.) :thumbsup:

Torrefazione Italia cafes got me started on light brown sugar in my espresso. It’s not as processed, so it adds a little depth to the espresso. Try it out sometime. Put in the cup as you draw the shot, and it melts together MMmmmmmmm.

I have heard the Alpenroast is a good machine. I laughed when I heard a dj on the radio talking about a co-worker “baking” coffee beans, to which his morning show partner laughed at him while correctly saying, “no, he ‘roasts’ his beans . . .” well . . . I guess you had to be there :roll:

Have you ever tried dishing up some of your favorite chocolate (brownie fudge) ice cream and pouring a little of a freshly drawn shot over it? You can get quite creative you know, with broken up bits of a cookie or even fresh ground espresso beans :boggle:

Hey!!! Watch it there! I’m supposed to be on a diet! :imp: :cry:

Ooops! :smiley: I’ll try to be more sensitive about that.