Forgive me if this topic has been discussed before, but it’s something that’s always on my mind:
It goes along with the question of what makes authentic style or authentic playing, and also the…issue of pure-drop vs. neo-trad vs. modern interpretation (and even whether you should use the word “Celtic” at all, or stick to “Irish,” “Scots,” etc…)
Hmm..hard question to frame, actually. But my thinking goes like this: if you’re playing in public, whether it be at a session or a performance, how do you be responsible to a culture that you may not have been raised in, or even may not really be a part of at all (e.g., my roots are mainly swedish and german; my maternal grandfather was welsh)? Is it enough to love and promote the culture to the best of your ability, or is partaking of and presenting that cuture without having been steeped in it a form of cutural imperialism? I’ve always been drawn to (forgive me for using the word) Celtic cultures, ever since I can remember, but it isn’t my own culture, and I do worry about perpetuating some weird kind of opression where there has been so much already, historically, even if it comes from a well-meaning heart.
In singer’s circles there’s often a stated agenda that you shouldn’t do music that isn’t a direct part of your personal cutural heritage–not sing in gaelic if it isn’t a language you were brought up in, or do only the Americanized versions of songs (Shady Groves as opposed to Matty Groves, etc.). But how much can you do that without veering off into musical territory that maybe doesn’t interest you as much? And how does that carry over into instrumental music?
Well, sorry if this is long and vague–as I said, it’s something I think about, living as I do in a young land where cultural boundaries are often blurred. And I’m interested to know what others think.
Caitlin