Dale
You publicly announced that you would re-instate my links after I had apologised to you. I have done so, in a private e-mail, as properly as I could, under the difficult circumstances. Unfortunately, you appear to have renaged on you decision, by now demanding that I agree to not to sue anyone.
I have already explained that I have no intention of suing you. However, the damning and unfair statement about my business remains close to the top of your message board. Azalin has already stated that he deliberately returned to the thread to keep it up there. He has also declared a personal dislike of me, but has not given a reason for this. I see no reason why, under the circumstances that he might not continue to use the board to cause problems for me.
Can you see that it would be unfair to me, to agree not to take action against someone who has deliberately set out to cause me problems that could have serious financial consequences? Personally, I feel that you should also consider taking action against such trouble-makers, as it gives the board a bad name.
My business practices are fair and honest. I charge more in Euros than some charge in dollars, because I buy at a different exchange rate, when buying from the UK and other countries, and this is reflected in my prices. Euro to UK sterling rates, by the way are very favourable for UK residents, and no one in England has ever complained that I am too high. If other dealers have been complained about in the past on this board, then I can only imagine that what they were doing was unfair (like the e-bay transactions you mentioned). My business practices are not unfair, and my prices are geared towards a profit margin of between a standard 35% and 50% of the wholsale prices. I also include shipping in my prices and often free pouches, and other items, like whistles. I frequently send out whistles for nothing, if there has been an error or other mix up.
You can see then, I hope, why I become irate when I am accused of being unfair in my business practice.
I also hope that you can see why I wish to reserve the right to respond accordingly to anyone who maliciously tries to undermine my business. The usual response, when all others have failed (and I did reply to Azalin on the board, but he got worse, not better) is a legal one. It is a standard right of all citizens of most civilised societies. I reserve the right to excercise it, if feasible and when I feel it is warrented.
I believe that you are being unfair in asking me to give up that right. If you don’t want the board to be involved in legal actions, I suggest that you find a way of dumbing the trouble-makers. But please do not ask us to give up our civil rights.
If you still feel that, having agreed to your request to apologise, that I am still not entitled to a re-instatement of my links, then so be it. However, I do feel that such a decision would reflect poorly on you.
Regards
Steve Power
Edited for typos - also sent to Dale as a private e-mail, with a statement that I would be publishing on the board.
[ This Message was edited by: StevePower on 2002-09-16 08:14 ]