I have found that http://emusic.com is one of the few online services that has Mary Bergins first 2 albums, by individual tune or complete album.
this service offers a trial membership
“Your first 14 days or 50 MP3s are free!
Cancel anytime during your free trial and you won’t be billed”
After that it is 40 MP3s/month for $9.99, 65 for 14.99 or something
Selection aint huge but I cant complain. Thier download manager works on Windows ME, unlike Napster and Itunes
Ms Bergin is pretty good…
Oh cripes, just download winMX. 
No thanks. Not in the mood to get hassled by the RIAA or cleaning peer-shared viruses today…
I was a subscriber to eMusic for almost a year. Their catalog is pretty lousy, overall. Unless you have a very wide taste in music you will have downloaded everything that you consider worthwhile very quickly. Even then a lot of the stuff is of the nature that you might download it but wouldn’t bother to buy it if you saw the CD in a store.
When I signed up it was a pretty good deal in spite of the limited catalog because it was ten bucks a month for unlimited downloads. Then, while still advertising unlimited downloads they started cancelling the subscriptions of those who downloaded an “unreasonable” number of tunes. I got a very insulting warning myself, basically accusing me of all kinds of heinous crimes, because I happened to download about 2000 tunes one month (after not downloading anything at all in the previous four months). Their definition of “unreasonable” started at about 2500 tunes a month and kept dropping until it reached about 800 tunes a month the last I heard.
Then, in late September or very early October I got a message informing me that their service was changing (this in spite of the fact that I’d signed up for a year which wasn’t yet over) to the new scheme of forty downloads for ten bucks. That wouldn’t be a bad deal if they had a catalog that was worth 25 cents a track, but even with my eclectic tastes I’d say that less than 1 percent of their catalog is worth that. (If you’re heavily into a lot of really bad self-produced, garage-band alternative – as in alternative to music – stuff then your opinion may vary.) Oh, and they were still advertising “unlimited downloads” long after they’d notified members that even the pretext of unlimited downloads was being dropped at the end of October. They also shut off their forums about this time – that’s perfectly within their rights but IMHO it was pretty obvious that they did so to prevent potential subscribers from seeing that the terms were changing because you can bet there would have been a lot of discussion of it 
Another problem was that many of their MP3s were very badly encoded. They started out with everything at 128k. About a month after I subscribed they finally started using higher bit rates for most of the catalog, but even then there were a lot of problems. Many, many of the tracks that had been encoded from analog sources were recorded too hot and thus distorted – this was especially true with things like flute music and such where you have a very narrow frequency range in the peak amplitude. I’ve got entire albums that are almost painful to listen to. They had a reporting page for bad tracks but I used it several times and never saw a track fixed.
In short, at ten bucks a month for unlimited downloads it was a pretty good deal in spite of frequent bad tracks, a limited catalog, and non-existent response to bad-track notifications. Now, they’re charging ten bucks a month for forty downloads and trying to compare themselves favorably with services that charge a dollar a track but that have much better catalogs and charge you only for the tracks you actually want to download instead of hitting you for ten bucks a month even if you download nothing that month.
Maybe their catalog will improve, they’re promising that, but I saw them promise a lot of things that they failed, even refused, to deliver.
John
<nudge-nudge/wink-wink>I guess I will take my 50 free Mary Bergin, Matt Malloy, and Tommy Peoples MP3s, opt out, and “cut” my losses…</nudge-nudge/wink-wink>