not being allowed water

Lucky for you I have access to medical references. After an extensive search this afternoon, during which I investigated thyroid scanning procedures and the various compounds used in them, I finally found the answer to your question.

The reason you are asked not to drink water is to prevent side effects from the radioactive iodine. Often thought to be without deleterious effect, it turns out that the stuff actually does have one. As it only occurs in well-hydrated subjects, patients are asked to refrain from drinking water.

I was a little surprised to find that this wasn’t listed in the possible complications of thyroid testing on all the patient-oriented websites I saw, but I suppose they don’t want to cause excessive worry. After all, it’s more important to get your thyroid fixed than to worry about a mere complication like this one, which is certainly not life-threatening. Still, there is all that about disclosure, but there really isn’t any other way to do this test. If people refused it, it would be a bad thing for them. I can understand that.

Anyway, I finally found this buried in old journal articles. Really, I had to dig to find this, but there it was. Reading through the articles–most of which I could only get in abstract form on such short notice, so I apologize for not being able to provide more complete information for you–it appears that the reason for the ban on water is, as I mentioned, to prevent a side-effect of the drug.

It seems that in the original studies conducted on this, which were longitudinal studies conducted over a number of years, so the cause-effect nature of this kind of got lost in translation, apparently, and this undoubtedly has made it easier for the drug companies to gloss over the risk, patients were tested in both hydrated and dessicated states to see the relative efficiency of uptake of the iodine. Patients were, of course, as you would in any good study, questioned carefully about their intake of water and, just so that forgetting and deliberate contrariness would not skew the results, but mostly to determine the length of time a patient would need to be dehydrated for best results, put on varying schedules of water consumption both before and after ingestion of the radioactive iodine. The problem turned out to be that male patients, particularly in early adulthood, who were not thoroughly dried out for a period of time–I forget what it was because I was interrupted constantly this afternoon–before and after taking the drug developed irreversible impotence. It took some time to appear–a year or two–so that it was difficult to connect the side effect with the ingestion of the drug and the degree of dehydration, but several data analyses have demonstrated that there is a cause and effect relationship, so it’s a done deal, so to speak. It looks like, as it so often does, that the testing methodology–patient instructions and so forth–was designed with this in mind, but that as time went on the original reasons were forgotten. So, you were told not to brush your teeth to prevent any early ingestion of water that could have had a disastrous consequence. Only, nobody really remembers what it is. Go figure.

As you know, of course, you won’t glow in the dark or anything from this, nor will you set off theft detectors in stores, and all that. But, I’m sure they told you this. So, as long as you didn’t drink any water, not even one or two minutes early, you’re safe.

Lamby - you have all the fun!

Irreversable impotence? :boggle: :boggle: :boggle:

I think Lambchop must be kidding.

Best wishes,
Jerry

I haven’t been online too much in the past week, and I might have missed something, so I apologize ahead of time if this is redundant. But Cran, did you get a positive test result for cancer? Why are they doing the radioactive iodine already? Also, if you are doing the radioactive iodine, please tell me that they have you quarantined.

It was the tracer iodine, which needs traced on the scans, not the one that makes you radioactive. I still have no results (from the biopsy), but the doctor said the pathologist could send them back any day now. Waiting is so much fun! (I’d put a rolling eyes face here if it were not disabled.)

The eye rolling emoticon has been banned?

If true, that’s the best news I’ve seen all week!

Best wishes,
Jerry

This post has self-destructed. Move along. Nothing to see here.

The eye-rolling emoticon fell victim to a virus that evidently was place on the web by people who were annoyed by the practice of responding to someone’s post with nothing but the eye-rolling icon.

Luckily, eye-rolling emoticons, as already demonstrated, are now available from a variety of external sources including, of course, http://www.eyerollingicons.com

Dale

A more benificial virus has never been produced.


Ah, tricky Dale. The old “send em’ to a non-existant website” redirection.

ACK! That stuff is vile!

Now, Dr. Pepper is something akin to ambrosia. Mmm…

Fibber. I looked on elsewhere.org and elsewhere.com. There ain’t no smilies on there.

Yes, irreversible. The studies were done quite some time ago, so there has been a long enough time to meet the criteria for “irreversible.” And that’s longer than you’d want to be in that condition, believe you me!

The thing that really shocked me was that they didn’t adjust the time any to keep people within a safe zone, but just warned them sternly. I mean, if you knew that drinking water within a certain time would cause this degree of impairment–and we have to call it an impairment, don’t we? even though it’s more like an annoyance to some–wouldn’t you recommend abstaining for a few hours more? Or five or six? Just to be sure? But they don’t. They left the time at the minimum, so that even a tiny bit of cheating on the early side and . . . the damage is done. Irreversibly. No hope of ever getting it back.

One, two, three minutes early and . . . ploop. That’s all you have left.

Such a shame.

Especially in one so young. Years of debauchery wasted.