CrimsonTone wrote “too often when you speak to flute or other instrument makers its a case of hush hush - wink wink, what these professional makers are scared of & try so hard to guard is probably people cutting in on their business”
Actually this secrecy may be true amongst violin makers and their varnish theories but I have found that most wind instrument makers are quite willing to exchange ideas and share information, if they have the time. Colleagues usually like to share. I’ve only met a few who seemed like they needed to guard their trade secrets from me. I mostly avoid such people.
The biggest issue is time. Like everyone else we have bills to pay, kids in college, and are sometimes struggling to get by. Some might feel that we should be obliged to share our knowledge in the Freedom of Information Act sense and that such knowledge should be public property. I personally wish that I could teach a bunch. But unfortunately, its easier to survive making instruments and getting paid for them than spending time sharing our “trade secrets”. This seems to be true with any skilled craft such as blacksmithing, woodworking, etc. The individual artist has to eat, and usually doesn’t have the time to freely distribute advice. The wannabes including those who want to pursue some craft as a hobby frequently do not understand this.
The secrets of the Strad violins are right in front of everyones’ eyes, if one knows how to look. Its just that a mystique has been built and preserved around that instrument and by extension around most hand made instruments including flutes. The violin makers are still so caught up with this and their pet theories that they have ignored the simple evidence: that the Cremonese makers simply thinned the tables by compressing them from thicker pieces of wood, and bought their magical under-varnish at the local hardware store (which, amazingly, still makes the very same Amber-Linseed varnish to this day) the way we buy Polyurethane at Home Depot. There are no secret varnish recipes and they simply used what wood that was available.
The data on our flutes are there for posterity for anyone to examine and measure. Thus we have all of the secrets of Rudall, Hudson etc. on display not to mention our own instruments. There are no secrets.
The most important element that can’t be measured or taught is simply the practice and muscle memory that develops when doing this for any length of time. People who want to make things like flutes but haven’t yet usually do not understand this, and think that our skill comes from the secrets we hide. There is no substitute for Practice with anything musical, including making instruments. That is the secret!
Another factor is tooling. I frequently get asked “Where do you buy the reamers?” I don’t. These have to be made by oneself. Thus in addition to learning how to make flutes you have to learn how to make reamers. And other tools. I also get asked frequently if I take apprentices. Unfortunately I have only the one set of tools in my workshop and no room to set up another set of tools that the apprentice would have to provide for him/herself, not to mention the time. Teaching really slows down production and production is what feeds my family. The few times I have taught I’ve had to find something to work on during my prime working hours while my primary turning lathes were occupied. I can’t afford this!
As to cutting in on the business - new makers are always coming on-line and old makers are hanging up their reamers. The newer ones may be a bit more threatened by competition. There seems to be enough of a market. But not too much that some large offshore Asian producer will flood the market and undercut everyone, like they are able to do with guitars. Its too small of a market for that. Also, the Pakistani versions have given such offshore-derived flutes a sullied reputation.
As to resources, there are plenty out there. Articles in such journals as the Galpin Society Journal, FOMRHI, Early Music, YouTube videos and elsewhere. Have a look around.
Wink, wink, indeed!
Casey