I heard somewhere that this was a once in 500 years situation. I think it is sort of like the “big one” in California, except this happened now.
It seems that there is only so much money and, even though we know the “big one” is going to happen, on a daily basis that money is needed to save lives as well so then people have to decide what is more critical. If the “big one” happens in your lifetime, then the decisions seem maybe not good. If the “big one” didn’t happen in your lifetime, then it seems good for the money to have gone for what seem to be important social programs that feed people, provide medical care, etc.
To actually be ready for the “big one”, I think, would require huge warehouses full of trailers, food, water, helicopters, boats, hospital tents. And all these things would have to be kept in good condition, replaced regularly. Huge numbers of people, for whom there would normally be no work, would have to be on stand by.
When the “big one” hits California, I would think it would be like this too. And I do have a friend there who has some rucksacks on hand with essential things because she assumes she will be on her own for some period of time in a disaster.
I haven’t really heard criticism of the Red Cross or FEMA on the news, Weekenders. Perhaps I’ve not seen much.
The loss of civil order is, I guess, the result of a not very good decision—to pull the police off the streets and put them on search and rescue----although one that is understandable given the number of people stranded without water. If a person has lost everything and there is not much chance of getting anything soon, I’m sure the best of us might see a busted window, or bust one, and say I need some stuff. Stuff to eat, stuff to sell, stuff to trade, whatever. The trouble is it leads to worse things, people get frenzied, you get shop owners shooting people, looters shooting each other over a pair of jeans, looters robbing people passing by, mobs, riots, etc. It snowballs and people start getting killed. I had not thought about this much, but I believe now I could sort of understand the idea of shooting looters right off the bat regardless of the situation. More people will die if you don’t stop it right away. I don’t know what they can do now.
I really have no facts, nor am I trying to argue anything. It does seem as though the police, for example, would have had gasoline and food and water set by because they would likely be needed even in a much smaller hurricane. And the police will always have to stay in the disaster area. So that seems strange. But a lot of other things don’t seem that strange to me. I think there are logistics things that we probably just can’t know about.
The number of people that have lost everything and have no prospects for the future is almost more than a person can take in. I know this has happened for various reasons to huge groups of people before, but not in this country during my lifetime I guess.
One bright thing is that there are different cooperative associations for colleges, universities and the like who work together. I think that at some point, students who were going to schools that can’t open sometime soon are likely to be able to be placed in another school. The school where my husband works talked about that yesterday.