Notes on your quotes in the spirit of discussion, not polemics:
[quote]
On 2002-04-08 15:15, TrevorC wrote:
“While O’Carolan’s music certain is Irish, it isn’t the sort of music that’s traditionally been played at sessions. Sessions are all about dance music, and have been such for as long as I know.”
But how many people dance at sessions, I ask? i get the feeling that you want an atmosphere where they COULD dance, but tempos for dancing seem less-considered these days, based on records et al…
" When you look at it objectively, you find that traditional music and O’Carolan tunes don’t come out of the same traditional at all."
Agreed, but the body of traditional tunes is so huge that people don;t always know what they;re playing. I have found Ocarolan melodies (Planxty Mrs. Oconnor and One Bottle More) called other things in Norbecks tune index for example. As long as we don;t know it was for the wealthy, it’s okay to actually play the notes???
“At a lot of the sessions I’ve gone to, O’Carolan tunes have been treated somewhat like slow airs or songs. … I personally prefer the jigs and reels by far to O’Carolan tunes.”
I believe One Bottle More and Mrs. Oconnor are jigs but maybe I am force-fitting them. Inchiquin is perhaps a march, though notated in a tunebook as in 3 (seems like one of those tunes that ought to be measured in 2/2 or something)? But many sure make nice airs as you say, which is why I like them for variety.
“While I wouldn’t mind playing a couple during the course of a session, continually pulling out those tunes would get annoying quickly.”
Point well taken in a paradigm of jigs and reels…I get that.
Thanks for input, Trevor.
Adding this later: it seems that I stumbled into one of those proletariat/bourgeiosie/aristocrat/Republican things. Traditional means just that; the combined experiences and practices of a given group of people. It’s never just as simple as playing music, whether its “correct” Early Music practice, ornaments on Bach etc etc. People get clannish, hierarchical and start drawing lines of definition. We celebrate its greatness and suffer by its limits. And the very best practitioners seem to be the only ones allowed to CHANGE it (to the grunts and groans of the comfortably entrenched).
The only point I would make (in bothering to present an opposite view) is that Traditional proletariat institutions can sometimes be trumped by their own exclusivity.An example: nothing would seem as proletarian as American Bluegrass Music, music of the hill-folk of Appalachia. Yet it was mandated by Bill Monroe (one of its founders) for years and years that women could NOT play bluegrass. And there are still many people who do not accept women players…It doesn’t fit into a neat Socialist or other kind of dynamic profile, that’s for certain. But it is (WAS) Traditional.What a loss TO THE PEOPLE if we did not have some of the very fine women players, in both Celtic and Bluegrass music.
I identify with OCarolan, Bach and any other working musician who wanted to stay fed.Heck, OCarolan was blind so he couldn;t do much else. Bach was a CHRISTIAN, first and foremost,not an aristocratic toady, even though he worked for aristocrats at times. We study in Music History that Beethoven was among the first truly self-employed musicians who didn;t kiss royal ass.Last time I checked, OCarolan was way before him and its unfortunate if people are holding him to some non-Republican or Anglo-submitting position. With the more than a millenium of pain the Irish have suffered by Brit aristocrats, maybe its just too much to ask for his melodies to be accepted given that he wrote for-pay tributes(the Planxties) to the lords and ladies…
But why are they included in Oneill’s Collections if they were not being played by Traditional players? Maybe they were being played in Chicago but not Dublin?
As for quality of music and the argument that Traditional jigs and reels are better, I think his music is quite fine by any standard and as I pointed out before, it has infiltrated the traditional corpus in disguise. I’m not sure where musical opinion and social opinions divide in this issue though. Based on the nature of this argument, I think its more social…
Its otherwise senseless for ME to argue about whether this music should be played in sessions and I want to make that clear. I’m not shooting any messengers and I don;t want to discourage finding out what people really do because I am the newcomer. I have learned from this thread today to save my Carolan for my group and not expect to play or hear it in a Traditional-style session. Until (or if) the Tradition changes.
[ This Message was edited by: The Weekenders on 2002-04-08 19:31 ]