Flute upgrade question

Do I dare add my own thoughts?!

I’m a new maker, maybe 2 years at most, and only about a year or less taking it more seriously. That does allow me to have this perspective: the consistency with which the top flutes are made is insane and the effort needed to accomplish that may seem trivial, but it’s anything but.

To the original point. I admit to never having played a Copley, but I do know the reputation and that is stellar.

So to address the initial question: what constitutes an “upgrade” to you. A few options to consider:

    • Material - I can understand the desire to own a wooden flute. Delrin and similar materials can make amazing flutes, especially in the hands of the makers who have been developing these models for a while now. I imagine in many cases you’d have a difficult time in a blind test reliably identifying the two. BUT, there’s something about wood that feels nice, and to many there’s a sense of connection with the past even in a modern-made instrument. There’s also, right or wrong, a feeling of professionalism with a wooden instrument vs polymer.
  • Tuning slide - frankly not an upgrade. Most instruments are tuned well enough that minor adjustments can be made by the player. Unless you play outside in a marching band and so inside the pub by the fireplace, most people won’t need to adjust barely ever. It is NICE to have, but not necessary and not worth “upgrading” just for that. If it has it, great, if not, no big deal. My own flutes are fully lined with tuning slides, but that’s personal preference in what I chose to make rather than a value judgement on the merits of slides.

  • Instrument quality / playability / tone - Copley is up there with reputation so the question becomes what aspect you are trying to upgrade in quality. To that end, I think the only reliable way to determine what would constitute and upgrade would be to play the flutes and see what felt most responsive and intuitive with the player end of the instrument, your breath and embouchure.

  • Keys - obviously, if you are interested in expanding your musical range, then keys will facilitate that. They aren’t strictly necessary for ITM though can be useful at times. That is to say, keys are only an upgrade if the lack of keys are dampening your enjoyment.

So my personal opinion would be that if you are enjoying the Copley, and don’t have aims to play gigs in key signatures that would require keys, then you don’t need an upgrade. If you wanted to supplement your collection, that’s what you’d be doing by getting another keyless flute, rather than upgrading, per se. Even getting a wooden a flute would be down to some desire for that “feel” of wood, vs delrin, as opposed to an upgrade.

Now, as to cost and Pakistani made flutes and the like I think much has been said in these last couple pages. I’ll offer this.

From what I can tell, Pakistani made flutes and those made in Pakistan and perhaps tweaked by more known makers, are much better now than their reputation online would lend you to believe. That is, while the stereotypical eBay flutes are likely still firewood, there are some makers from that region making okay instruments, for the most part playable and generally in tune. They suffer significant issues of quality control and so vary significantly in quality between instruments. But, generally, they are now playable, even their keyed flutes.

I had a maker from that region reach out and offer to send me an example of his flutes, modeled to some extent after an Irish makers offerings (not M&E, though the images of the Blackwood keyed flute on offer gave me some pause…). I will say this, while the embouchure needed a good amount of work it was thankfully on the small side and was easily re-worked to be half-decent. And while the bore may never be great, a bit of effort there smoothed it enough that it’s not too bad. The keys are large and clunky but they work smoothly and seal. That is to say, it’s a working keyed flute.

Now, as to the question of value. I would not buy a flute if its quality for the price listed on certain retail sites. In my opinion they are worth something to a beginner looking to get a budget flute to learn to play with keys and see if it’s something they like. But to hopefully expand on what I take to be paddlers point, functional doesn’t mean good. And I think the key reason for Cyberknights thoughts are because these offerings are overvalued making it seem like the effort to make them more in line with quality makers isn’t all that large.

Keys may be functional and seal well, but what about responsiveness, weight, feel/reach of the fingers, etc. Aesthetics obviously also play a part. Sports cars don’t just perform great, they look nice as well. It’s not a primary reason for their draw, but for many it’s important; after all you spend hours and hours a week (or day!) with it, it should please you to look at it.

As to the cost of keys. To be clear, a six key flute has several hundred dollars worth of silver on it, regardless of the effort to build. And never mind any wasted parts from failed castings or screw ups (which do happen!). Think about this too: every time you touch a part you risk marring or even ruining it. Every time you drill a hole you risk tear out, every time you undercut a hole you risk throwing the whole instrument off balance intonation-wise which means potentially having to retouch every hole. It may not seem like it but even closed toneholes impact the intonation and tonality of a flute.

Think about this too, a keyless flute is a tube with seven holes in it and they command a good price, a six key flute has twice as many tone holes, additional counterbores for the pad seats, additional blocks that need to be machined or posts that need to be laid out, drilled and tapped precisely, and all that silver that needs to be made, shaped, polished, pads added to diff springs adjusted and readjusted, etc. it’s a daunting task to do well.

Yes, it can be done with less effort with mass manufactured keys of inferior materials and bulky design, but as paddler said keys as designed to suit the flute. A flute can be fitted with a pre-made key by locating it as needed based on the pad size, but a GOOD key is sized and fitted to the flute, not the other way around.

I understand what cyber knight is saying. Flutes CAN be made more cheaply. But I’d say making them more inexpensively is not likely to happen. These are fine instruments that take years to master the design, crafting, tooling, voicing of and that experience and end product come at a premium. And there aren’t that many makers out there in general making keyed flutes. Getting them all together to remake their whole designs just to save a couple bucks by mass producing keys as some sort of co-op isn’t likely to happen. And the demand isn’t there for like a flute makers guild where they all make the same flute for mass retail.

A decent, playable Irish flute, even a keyed one, can be had for a budget value. M&E flutes are a good example of this. I own a keyless that I’ve been very happy with and I leave it assembled and take camping with me. I’ve played a six key delrin and wasn’t very pleased with it. But I know several people who play them anyway and do a great job of it.

With that said, A quality flute that will please you to hear and allow you to get the most possible out the instrument as you grow as a player comes at a premium because to make such an instrument is a LOT of work and takes an incredible amount of knowledge, experience, and craftsmanship.

Many makers can get 95% of the way there and for many or most people that is probably enough. I’ve honestly been tempted to offer reworked Pakistani flutes myself, clearly labelled as such, at a lower price point than offered by others currently, explicitly for that market that wants a serviceable flute but with the full understanding that it’s not their forever flute. I’ve not elected to go that route at this time though, for a variety of reasons.

But I think the reason why that last few percent gap commands such a high price is that the effort and attention to detail required is so much greater. With years of experience a skilled maker can do that work efficiently, but make no mistake. It’s a lot of work.

This is why I don’t believe there is a middle ground. Either make it serviceable, good enough, and sell for relatively cheap, or put in the time and effort to make it as good as your skill allows. Those who are able and willing to put in the time are making instruments at the height of the craft and the cost of the instruments reflect that as they do with any other instrument on the market. It’s as much a work of passion as it is production.

Those are my thoughts anyway. I’d keep the delrin unless you want wood or keys

This is very impressive, and I wouldn’t have guessed it based upon a video tour of the workshop. But I shouldn’t be surprised, because I have a lot of specialized equipment in my shop, but it doesn’t follow that someone is manning each piece during production. It’s more like what you describe: moving larger batches of flutes through through the process, moving it from station to station. Even so, doing that with two guys…respect.

But I love Patrick’s remark (“Finish it!”). I’m mildly OCD about finishing flutes (it’s about the only area in which I’m this fastidious), and even with a strong streak of perfectionism, this fastidiousness is still on a spectrum. Meaning that the more energy and attention I put into those little details, the more I discover ways in which I can be even more fastidious. I definitely didn’t get really obsessed with trying to go that final 10% at the get-go. It’s been an evolution of years and it hasn’t stopped–I’m still finding ways in which I can do a better job and stay on my game. Complacency is a danger with any type of craft that requires repetition (doing the same thing each day). It’s not hard to get distracted and to let something slip by. I would say that part of the value in trying to be really finicky at every stage is that it gives you a little bit of slack, in that if you have a bad day and let standards slip, they don’t slip far enough than anyone notices (i.e. the slip does not have a perceivable negative impact on the instrument). Hopefully :wink:.

And the other important thing is being open to criticism and input. I had sent an ebonite flute to Jem Hammond at one point to do a field test, and he (bless his heart) took it along to show it to Chris Wilkes and get some feedback (which I valued extremely). Chris offered a damn useful piece of advice about attempting to increase the polish in the bore (ebonite can ream a bit rough at times, especially colored ebonite), and I gratefully implemented this advice on future flutes. It’s one of those fussy things that didn’t make a big difference, but it did make some difference. And those little adjustments are part of those final percentage points.

In my opinion, unless one’s an expert in a field, it’s very hard to judge what is or isn’t good or great, sure the average person might be able to discern what’s is an okay product verses a poor product, but to judge what really is a great product, one needs to have the experience, and in this case, it helps to have great hearing, and the ability to see beyond what’s in front of them, That is, to have exceptional ability. Most people will never understand or appreciate the difference between okay, good and great, they don’t have the experience or the physical abilities, but those who do, really do.

I spent my career making what I would call high end custom jewelry. The issue of quality was always present. Many of my contemporaries made a good product, and it was right for their market. But, just because someone does something for a long time, it doesn’t make it great, or even good. What many would see as good or great, I saw as crap. In most cases an average person doesn’t care, and they don’t have the tools to tell. And that’s fine, they’ll know what they like, but that doesn’t make it great, or even good.

In my opinion, one has to have the desire to do their best work. and also have the physical skill and natural gifts (hearing & seeing for flute making) to execute it, along with the experience of knowing what real quality is, to make something great. I think Loren’s example of what they were doing, speaks to this.

One of the things I’ve learned over the years, is that certain individuals have a special knack for what they do, which makes what they do special. I’m willing to pay for that.

Totally agree with the importance of an instrument’s individual fit and suitability. I’m assuming the OP has sufficient experience to have already acquired a flute that is a fit.

I discovered after starting on a keyless D flute that simple system piccolo is my natural fit. Most have 6 keys anyway, and like most of us I quickly went through the unsuitable-but-cheap-on-eBay phase. I certainly wouldn’t recommend anyone perseveres playing for example, a bog-standard late 19th century German piccolo expecting there to be much in the way of untapped potential. But the inevitable learning curve and finding a decent instrument that is a fit does make a huge difference. I have around half a dozen quality English piccolos. Each has its own voice. I’m dubious that one could describe that one or other represents an ‘upgrade’ over another; rather each offer slight difference. I play and enjoy them all. It is worth spending time discovering what each has to offer too. And that goes hand-in-hand with our own development as a player.

My feeling is that societally we’re especially culturally influenced to think in terms of purchasing progress incrementally as a ‘given’. I’m highly sceptical of that idea in relation to any creative and expressive activity. It can verge on an obsessive consumer focus on the merits of this make vs that make when what matters is musicality. And musicality derives from application.

Some interesting thoughts in this thread on flute production and keyed vs. keyless flutes. As wells as regards M&E flutes. I will share a few thoughts in response to the original poster’s question as well as a few thoughts on M&E flutes based on my experiences. I’m also a beginner having played flute for about 2 years, but having played various other musical instruments for about 40 years.

To the OP – I don’t think that you’ll see an improvement in your playing by upgrading to a flute with a tuning slide. As you probably know, that will mostly come in handy where you are playing with others. You’ll be able to better match pitch with other players, though, as you point out, you can get some tuning benefit from the joint on your current flute and you can also adjust pitch with your airspeed, which you might naturally do if listening to those playing with you.

From everything I’ve heard, Copley makes wonderful, playable flutes. For me, the important thing is that a beginner not have a flute that gets in his or her way. Saving money on a beginner flute can be costly in the long run. Sometimes it’s hard to know what works and what doesn’t without experimenting, especially as a beginner. In my case, the M&E keyless flute saved me. My first flute purchase was a McNeela Cygnet. I didn’t think of it as cheap in absolute terms, and from reviews I read, admittedly on the McNeela website, I thought it was good. But I really struggled to play it. Maybe it works for others, but I was on the verge of giving up when I read a few things on this forum and on the Session that made me think I should try something else. I got an M&E keyless flute and it was like night and day in terms of playability. I finally thought there was hope of my learning the instrument. The main difference was the embouchure hole. The M&E embouchure hole was larger…I also think it is more of a rounded rectangle shape, whereas the Cynet was smaller and oval. I could finally get a sound with ease. The M&E also had separate pieces for the top hand and lower hand tone holes. Being able to offset these made a big difference in comfort for me.

Other thoughts on M&E – the fit and finish is not stellar. I get a little wiggle from one of the joints when I pick it up and there are “drip” marks in one or two places where whatever coating goes on the outside was not applied smoothly. There were also a few scratches on it even when it arrived new. That said, I like that it’s not precious and that I can leave it assembled and ready to play without worry (particularly because it’s Delrin).

To round out the story, about a year after purchasing the M&E, which was marginally more costly than the McNeela Cygnet, I went all-in and acquired an Olwell Nicholson. It’s a beautiful instrument and I don’t at all regret purchasing it, but has it improved my playing? Nope. I’m still a beginner. I could say a number of things about how the Olwell seems improved over the M&E and a much better instrument overall, but my playing is more or less the same on both. I have no doubt that as I improve, I will see more benefit from the Olwell, but at this stage of my playing, I’m the limiting factor, not the flute! Unlike the move from the Cygnet to the M&E, where I think the Cygnet was holding me back.

In sum, I agree with those who counseled the OP to stick with his Copley and to save up for the six-key he mentions wanting. I think M&E flutes are quality instruments and buying one made a huge difference for me. But everybody is different and your mileage may vary! It’s actually all I can do to stop myself buying a Delrin Copley as my “not afraid to leave out” practice flute as upgrade over the M&E, even though I know that what I have is working for me. It’s always tempting to think the next purchase will make a difference, when it’s really just sitting down and practicing more that has the most impact! Though had I not bought the M&E and instead stuck it out with the Cygnet, I wonder if I’d be playing today. There is a baseline quality/fit that’s needed, but after that, most of it is down to the player.

Your judgement of that is probably right. There will be occasions when an inexpensive keyed flute gets them all working well due to the person on slave wages who fits the keys happening to be on good form, but you always need to get reviews from lots of people to find out what they’re like on average. We may have reached a point where the metal parts could be 3D-printed to make that more affordable with rapid adaptation to each new flute design, but the main expense is always going to be the time cost of fitting them, or at least, that will be the case until we have instruments put together by intelligent machines with the same exacting precision each time without any wages needing to be paid. Maybe ten years from now we’ll get that.