On 2002-03-15 22:36, Feadan wrote:
Creating a seperate forum does not mean that all the more knowledgable people will go away. Only those whose patience levels are waning. There are plenty of folks who will stick around to try to help newcomers.
The only crazy thing about it is that If You Build It, They Will Come. And I mean all the theys that are out there, experienced or no. There is no way to limit someone’s participation on a particular board if you make it. Who would referee such a board? Who would decide what questions were tedious? Would you make it a free for all that said “okay, you have the right to chase anyone you deem inane and repetitive away”?
Ok, here’s an sample case: You start C&F level 2, and on it, you make a charter saying “you must have X amount of whistle experience to ride this forum”. Well, Bob has been collecting whistles for 3 years. Binky has been performing professionally for 20. Biff has been tootling around learning the same song for 10. If all 3 of these people post the same inane repetitive question, how will you differentiate? =) Lots of experienced people ask dumb questions too. If all 3 of them wander around and post OT things, who is going to chase them away, and how? You see the problems.
In my opinion, what is going on with some people is personal burnout. If people are tired of helping (and that is NOT a bad thing – it happens sometimes; we all need breaks), then they should stop reading irritating posts/questions. If they can’t stop doing that, then maybe they need to take a break from the forum altogether for a few weeks to regain perspective. It’s not easy to do, but sometimes it’s necessary.
The other possibility is to build in some sort of filtering system in the board, whereby one could filter topics and users one did not want to read input from – but that’s a lot of work for the people who run the joint already, and I for one am not willing to ask them to do that, when we could just as easily start a Usenet newsgroup dedicated to whistles… then people would be forced to rely on themselves as personal referees via their news clients (and no, saying it’s too hard to set up a news client isn’t an excuse when you’re comparing it to the time others have put into building the board). 
my 49 cents – won’t even buy a cuppa joe anymore. 
stimps
(my edit was to change a word for clarity)
[ This Message was edited by: stimps on 2002-03-15 23:15 ]