I’ve been reading this guy jim stone’s posts. Over 10,000! That just seems really–I don’t know–bourgeois.
Hey, that’s not fair. So there are lots of posts.
It’s a message board. I’m not bourgeois!
You are bourgeois!
I’m not!
You are! You are!
YOU’re Bourgeois!
Why are you calling me bourgeois?
You called me bourgeois.
It’s bourgeois to call somebody bourgeois!
You just called me bourgeous. Precisely my point. You’re bourgeois!
Ah ha! You mispelled ‘bourgeois.’
How bourgeois!
Correcting someone’s spelling errors, especially in this context, is really, really bourgeois!
Hey, who are you anyway?
Why are you on my case?
I’m your wife, you moron.
Oh, that’s right. You always call me bourgeois.
Well, HAPPY NEW YEAR everybody, from Jim
And Judy
Well, Jim and Judy, you’ve just reminded me why I’m no longer married: all that bickering!
Happy New Year, both of you–and everybody else.
Susan
My planned responses crumbled before the weight of your logic. ![]()
Happy 2008, folks!
Tom
Well, I was certainly glad for that bit of illumination at the end of page one!
It seemed most unlike Jim. Replies of 1 or 2 lines?
Now it makes sense.
yup! ![]()
Well, she isn’t named ‘KO’ for nothing!