Ok. So, today it occurred to me that there might be a way to establish a guideline about negative posts that had not occurred before. Controversies about negative posting have occurred on other C&F boards. I have been accused of not liking negative posts. This is untrue. I really do think it is a good service for people to share a range of positive and negative opinions and positive and negative experiences with various products. Here are some examples:
Acceptable post: “I had difficulties with Maker X. He promised delivery in two months and, when I did not receive the product in four months, he did not respond to three emails…(etc.). When I got the product, I felt it was not suitable for me. The doo-hickey key was out of alignment and the walls were too thin, etc.”
Perfectly acceptable. It give details. It is not second hand. It is not vague. And, this is critical: it allows a discerning reader to decide for herself whether she would consider these to be things SHE would regard as a problem. She might not be bothered by late shipments. She might like her doo-hickey key out of line. She might like thin walls, etc.
Unacceptable post: “I’ve heard bad things about Maker X.”
It is vague, 2nd hand, and useless to the reader. It might lead people, unnecessarily and unfairly, to avoid Maker X. In the absence of information, people tend to assume the worse.
Unacceptable post: “I’ve had problems with this maker and I’m not prepared to go into details.”
Then, respectfully, don’t post. It’s unfair. It creates a negative impression which is wholly without support.
Acceptable post: “McFadden’s whistles require too much air for my taste, and the materials are a bit too inexpensive.”
It’s an opinion. It’s free speech. It gives the reader some information.
Unacceptable post: “McFadden’s whistles are crap.”
Ill-mannered, unfounded, unsupported, provocative and useless to the reader.
Does this help?