A dilemma

Ok, I just noticed that I am starting to get towards triple digits in my posts. Now, while this does not put me anywhere near the likes of Loren, et. al., it is a momentous occasion, as it will be the most I have participated on any forum other than newsgroups.

Now, the dilemma is do I keep to my usual scarcity of posting, only commenting on rich, fruitful topics, or do I start putting “fluff” out there? If I put fluff, does the 100 posts count? Kind of like that lady basketball player they let take free throws with a broken foot so she could break the points record.

I welcome any and all suggestions. :sunglasses:

Aodhan

I’ll race you.:slight_smile:

You can do several things to drive up the numbers.

  1. Pick someone to argue with and repeated post barbs back and fourth.

  2. Start a thread about Andrea Corr’s attire.

  3. Pick on a brand of whistle and complain about it. This works especially well if it is a high-end whistle. Say something like “My Feadog Mk II sounds better than any Overton.”

  4. Post a suggestive topic like, “Only a sissy would drink Guiness.”

That should do it.

TD- the alter ego of -±±+999999%%%%%%% Admm.. .VIag…

SYSTEM FAILURE

I haven’t posted in about a month, because I’ve been busy with putting together a course that I’ve never taught before. Not that anyone cares; I just wanted to push up the total number of my posts by at least one today.

On 2002-08-29 16:18, TubeDude wrote:
You can do several things to drive up the numbers.

  1. Start a thread about Andrea Corr’s attire.

Uhm…who’s Andrea Corr? Should I care about her attire?

Aodhan

So, are ya sayin that Loren is the King of Fluff? :slight_smile: Your kung fu must be better than mine! :slight_smile: I think I’ll leave the dojo now…

I tried a few weeks ago to abstain enough to fall out of the top 40, but that didnt last (much to the chagrin of many, I would imagine). Then I binged and Im up to, what, No. 32? Ouch.

As with anything, do what feels right. If these folks will put up with my ravings, then it will survive and perhaps thrive on whatever fluff you may contribute.

DAZED
A minor, incorrigibly recidivistic purveyor of Fluff

On 2002-08-29 16:28, Aodhan wrote:

On 2002-08-29 16:18, TubeDude wrote:
You can do several things to drive up the numbers.

  1. Start a thread about Andrea Corr’s attire.

Uhm…who’s Andrea Corr? Should I care about her attire?

Aodhan

Hehehe…there you go, you’ll have 100 posts in no time.

On 2002-08-29 15:58, Aodhan wrote:

Now, the dilemma is do I keep to my usual scarcity of posting, only commenting on rich, fruitful topics, or do I start putting “fluff” out there? If I put fluff, does the 100 posts count?

If we don’t count fluff, Walden only has seven actual posts…and I have none. Long live fluff!

(I’m kidding, Aaron…about yours, anyway)

Or you could start a thread claiming that all those who have posted under pseudonym’s are gutless cowards.

Loren

Dazed, good to see you, buddy. Although I have to say..you look a lot like a tube, dude.

On 2002-08-29 16:40, blackhawk wrote:
Dazed, good to see you, buddy. Although I have to say..you look a lot like a tube, dude.

So sorry, your meaning I am not understanding?


This Post registered a score of: [8.9]
on the Dazed FluffMeter

On 2002-08-29 16:44, DazedinLA wrote:

On 2002-08-29 16:40, blackhawk wrote:
Dazed, good to see you, buddy. Although I have to say..you look a lot like a tube, dude.

So sorry, your meaning I am not understanding?


This Post registered a score of: [8.9]
on the Dazed FluffMeter

I just thought Tubedude’s voice sounded lot like you, Kev. That’s not a bad thing. :slight_smile:

[ This Message was edited by: blackhawk on 2002-08-29 16:48 ]

On 2002-08-29 16:38, Loren wrote:
Or you could start a thread claiming that all those who have posted under pseudonym’s are gutless cowards.

Loren

That does it! I am tired of this! There is just so much pseudonym bashing that one can tolerate. No RATIONAL human being would consider such carp, Mr. Garage-Mahall!

TD- the other old whazziz name’s V.6 7/8

(Top poster trick #135: Say something controversial, purposely leave off the smiley face - regardless of you intentions - then post a follow-up post saying you didn’t think a simily face was needed, when people get pissed. This gaurantee’s several extra posts per week…or day. whatever)

Tube Dude,

Sorry brau, I forgot to add this :smiley: to my last post. I wasn’t bashing man, just having fun with you.

Hey, is anyone ready to bash that whistle maker who just posted a “Thank You”?

Loren

Okay, just in case any one wasn’t sure, I was joking about that last part. :slight_smile:

(Rule #136: You don’t have to wait for anyone to get pissed - just post a follow-up as a preemtive strike)

Hey Dale, how 'bout setting up some sort of “Frequent Poster Miles” program? I oughtta have earned a trip to…Trenton, NJ. by now.

Loren

On 2002-08-29 16:59, Loren wrote:

Hey, is anyone ready to bash that whistle maker who just posted a “Thank You”?

Loren

WEll, dude, lets see…you could say something harsh with no smiley, (their whistles smell of elderberries, you say?) some other people could react, I could come in with my usual “Lets all hold hands and sing Kumbaiya”, the situation will escalate when one or more whistle makers are implicated, others will chime in in defense, one or more of the Top 100 posters will get offended and flame out with a “Hasta La Vista Baby” post, Dale or Rich will chime in a few words of moderation and reason, most everyone then kisses and makes up, and I cap the whole thing off with another guacamole photo. In the process we’ll gain a few new recipes, some updated photos of Ms. Corr, perhaps a few of Nigella, some whistlesmiths will get more good press overall, and a few lurkers will be flushed to the surface, however briefly.

Estimated Total FluffPost Count: 65

Sounds fun, Loren, but maybe we should wait a week or so before we get this party rolling again.

I’ve got 213 posts and I’ve only been here a week longer than you!

I don’t think you are really very commited to playing the whistle. Send your whistles to me where they will be better appreciated.

Just kidding of course…

:wink:

Kim


“Whistling women and crowing hens never come to no good end”

[ This Message was edited by: Kim in Tulsa on 2002-08-29 17:26 ]

Fluff factor? Well, anyway…

Have you hear that RIAA’s site was hacked? Here is a link from the hacker’s site. http://minordamage.com/riaa_hack.jpg

I especially liked the link “Where Can I Find Information On Giant Monkeys?”

Which brings me to the point of my rant.
What the heck is up with the music industry? Big buisness is running art. What happened to TALENT? Brittny Spears? Common! Who buys that junk, her agent?

It’s like the Mafia is running it. Snoop Doggy? P. Diddy? Whazzup wit dat?

We muicians need to take the industry back! Are you with me?! Boycott the music industry! Burn your Michael Bolton CD’s. The time has come!

CD’s cost $18 for a $2 product. How much does the artist get? 5 cents.

Bumbs!

Better yet, I could simply tell folks they really ought to run out and buy the Flook “Rubai” CD, along with Lunasa “Merry Sisters of Fate” and, if they really want to learn a thing or two about ornamentation, phrasing and rhythm (whether you play flute OR whistle), the Wooden Flute Obession CD.

Low whistle lovers also need Brendan Ring’s “Troublesome Things”. Brendan, where can I get a poster of the Cover Art? I love that!!
And don’t forget Eoin Duignan, more great low whistle stuff.

Gotta plug Cormac Breatnach too, although he’s more of “High Whistle” sort of guy.

Don’t forget Old Blind Dogs, gotta have your Scottish fix, Right!

Okay, I’m off to fantasize about the Josie McDermott CD I have on the way (Thanks CS) Later,

Loren
P.S. Don’t be lamers, buy some of this S*** and support the artists, would ya fer cryin’ out loud?!?

On 2002-08-29 15:58, Aodhan wrote:
Ok, I just noticed that I am starting to get towards triple digits in my posts. Now, while this does not put me anywhere near the likes of Loren, et. al., it is a momentous occasion, as it will be the most I have participated on any forum other than newsgroups.

Now, the dilemma is do I keep to my usual scarcity of posting, only commenting on rich, fruitful topics, or do I start putting “fluff” out there? If I put fluff, does the 100 posts count? Kind of like that lady basketball player they let take free throws with a broken foot so she could break the points record.

I welcome any and all suggestions. > :sunglasses:

Aodhan

Seems to me that this very post shows that you’ve decided to go the fluff route. :slight_smile:

(Or was I supposed to leave that smiley off? :smiley: )