A comment on moderation

I’ve been doing a little thinking about moderation on the board. We now have four moderators and I am happy with the way moderation is proceeding on the board. It’s not perfect. There are always judgment calls involved, which allows for misjudgment, and I have made a number of misjudgments myself. Sometimes these are based on just misreading a post; or overreacting to something that might be something that bugs me more than other people.

I think the level of moderation of the board remains pretty much light-to-moderate. But, I also think we’ve been a bit less lenient than in the past, as the board continues to grow. I’ve made the painful call to suspend two or three members in recent weeks and some have angrily withdrawn from the board in response to being “moderated.” We’re locking threads, deleting some, and trying to foster a good e-environment.

There are some recurring themes that tend to lead to moderator action. Overall, I have been touched by how responsive people have been to the commercial post policies. I really do think the commercial post issue is the most complicated on the board. Consensus is not easy to reach–but I think we have a pretty solid consensus on it. Some people disagree with the policies but, as you know, consensus alway involves dissent. Although one of the most painful interventions I’ve had to make recently involved these policies, I really am so grateful at how respectful folks have been of the board’s efforts to balance commercial use of the board.

Another theme, most often seen on the Politics board, is for debates to degenerate into rather personal back-and-forths between individuals or political camps. It’s understandable, in many ways, but sometimes we have to step in and close those down.

People sometimes post things that are offensive to some–and sometimes it becomes apparent that the poster meant no offense. Those posters are then often personally offended when moderators intervene. Those folks often let their displeasure known and make it clear that they feel they were treated unjustly. That’s fine. Increasingly, though, I would like to see more people leave it there and move on. It’s really NOT the case that we don’t allow people to protest and express their resentment of the moderators. It is the case, however, that we’re not always in a position to justify what we’ve done. (Sometime because we can’t justify what we’ve done!) We do also have to discourage threads-about-moderated-threads.

Anyway, thanks to all for their support and I hope you’re continuing to enjoy and benefit from the board.

Dale

Seems like things are going just fine to me.
Even Karl Lagerfeld denies that he could have
done more than you guys to keep the forums fun.

Dale - what the heck is your avatar now? It looks like a tapeworm…

I do not envy you the task of moderating these boards.

I think overall the mods have done a fine job.

It will be interesting to see how much (or if) the new approach to moderation changes the feel of the boards over time.

C&F is a unique community.

–James

I wouldn’t want to say who that is but here’s a more detailed look.

must…not…engage…

(my recent mantra, even though I slip up now and then)

Oh, engage, engage. Just shut the door when attack-chihuahuas get itchy burrs clinging under their tails and they won’t stop yipping.

Easy for me to say. sigh

Dale, I seem to be enjoying it less and less.

All boards have moderators who step in and draw the line, move posts to a more appropriate forum and the like. However, in reading all the posts here lately about new compliances to moderation and the new people who are moderators and the like I end up getting kind of a funny, creepy feeling about it. Maybe it’s the combination of fawning and at the same time a power struggle not to mention the ‘ooh, so and so has just posted 5000 times’ … No doubt necessary to moderate and give accolades but probably just too touchy feely for my sensibilities the way it has come down.

(emphasis added by me)

I don’t quite understand what you mean. Is the creepy part having more mods, or that high-posters are made a big deal of?
I’m unclear who’s struggling for power, as well.

I too. :confused:

POWER STRUGGLE!!!

I support you no matter what you do, Dale. Even though I disagree with much of it, I’ve come to understand that yes, you do own the forums and you can do whatever you want.

Just what, exactly, are you getting at here? Doing whatever he wants? What the h e l l kind of statement is that? Cran, the rules of this forum are pretty clear and in the announcement forum if you are uncertain of what they might be. If anything, Dale bends over backwards to bend the rules for people.

Perhaps it is just me, but I find this statement in bad form and quite insulting. Think about it.

Looks like the fist in the velvet glove to me.

No, no, I mean it truthfully (not sarcastically at all). I know Dale is always getting picked on for all the different moderational moves he makes, and getting a lot of complaints from a lot of people (including me, even) so I just wanted to voice my full support to him. Yes, I’ve read the rules and I know them, but I was just saying that I support Dale. That’s all I meant. Maybe just “I support you” would have been better. I don’t mean it any other way, I promise.

¡Vivo el Undisputado!

The Planarians, founded in 1823 by the P.D.Q. Penn, great-grandson of William Penn and great-great-great-great-grandfather of Sean Penn, were an offshoot of early 19th century Quakers. They were accepted initially, despite their significant doctrinal differences with the main church and their having what was deemed, for the time, to be an excessive fondness for oatmeal, but eventually they became so strident and annoying that even the Quakers could not tolerate them.

Central tenets of Planarian doctrine –

Because they believe Christ had tapeworms (indicated by his continual production and consumption of loaves and fishes), they hold the common tapeworm to be holy. Consequently, they refuse treatment when infested, and since this makes them always hungry, they celebrate communion five times a day.

Oatmeal is not just for breakfast. The Planarians often employed it as a sex aid, and the phrase “Wouldst thou like to roll mine oats?” was a common question asked by horny young Planarian males when left near a comely (or homely, for that matter) female with no witnesses present.

Although pacifist not so much by nature as by necessity, their chronically tapeworm-weakened constitutions being generally unsuited for fisticuffs of any kind, they were not above decreeing in their catechism “Violence is not the answer, but it does keep certain problems from cropping up again and again and again.”

When there was real dirty work to be done, the Planarians typically hired it out.

The Planarians were wracked (or maybe racked, I don’t want to look it up now) by a schism in the early 20th century (the so-called Hookworm Heresy), and they very nearly disappeared. But comparatively recent discoveries relating to the use of oatmeal as a heart-healthy food has, unfortunately, caused a resurgence in interest in Planarian society and doctrine. Modern day Planarians are easily identified because they alway eat with their mouths open

:laughing:!