And did they tell you about AvaNut and ImNotBeth, eh? Did they tell you that? 
Was that you, Bloo? Sometimes it’s like playing “What’s My Line?” in that chatroom. Never a dull moment. 
Susan
(Good to have you posting again, Ava - I noticed it weeks ago.)
On 2002-11-14 15:24, Bloomfield wrote:
And did they tell you about AvaNut and ImNotBeth, eh? Did they tell you that? >
No, no one’s mentioned anything of the sort! Do tell! Perhaps in email? lol
On 2002-11-14 15:28, susnfx wrote:
Was that you, Bloo? Sometimes it’s like playing “What’s My Line?” in that chatroom. Never a dull moment. >
I regret to be unable to comment at this time. Thank you.
On 2002-11-13 23:43, avanutria wrote:
Actually, I was running a small contest. After all the hullabaloo about my posting so much, and some information I received in October, I was curious to see how long it would take for someone to notice I had left the board. >
I tried doing that. Nobody noticed.
Well, after all, you’re just a lurker…really.
And so am I.
1 Loren 1814
2 avanutria 1660
3 Bloomfield 1397
4 jim stone 1030
5 Tony 1029
6 Peter Laban 987
7 Walden 944
8 The Weekenders 883
9 TonyHiggins 860
10 Anna Martinez 825
11 Martin Milner 811
12 tyghress 795
13 ChrisLaughlin 741
14 StevieJ 739
15 blackhawk 717
16 Brian Lee 706
17 JessieK 700
18 mike.r 693
19 LeeMarsh 644
20 ErikT 617
There you go - the rogues’ list - twenty folks who clearly have way too much time on their hands
Where are these rankings coming from? Are they being compiled laboriously, by hand, so to speak?
I sure hope not.
No, if you click on Memberslist in the top right, and the click the heading “posts” it will sort in order of posts.
I’m sure glad I wasn’t mentioned.
Aha!
I’m #186; guess I’ve got a ways to go until I’m even in the running. Not that I deserve to be, rank amateur that I am.
wow… one more post and I’ll be at #25 for rank!
On 2002-11-14 18:33, Walden wrote:
I tried doing that. Nobody noticed.
Walden: Not true. I noticed that both you and Avanutria were missing. It’s just that being recent to the board, I felt a bit strange asking about it.
Hope you both are back to stay.
All the Best, Tom
On 2002-11-14 18:33, Walden wrote:
On 2002-11-13 23:43, avanutria wrote:
Actually, I was running a small contest. After all the hullabaloo about my posting so much, and some information I received in October, I was curious to see how long it would take for someone to notice I had left the board. >I tried doing that. Nobody noticed.
I also noticed.
On 2002-11-15 13:19, energy wrote:
I also noticed.
Yeah…but you was in the chat. Of course you noticed.
On 2002-11-15 17:46, Walden wrote:
On 2002-11-15 13:19, energy wrote:
I also noticed.
Yeah…but you was in the chat. Of course you noticed.
Humph.
On 2002-11-14 18:33, Walden wrote:
On 2002-11-13 23:43, avanutria wrote:
Actually, I was running a small contest. After all the hullabaloo about my posting so much, and some information I received in October, I was curious to see how long it would take for someone to notice I had left the board. >I tried doing that. Nobody noticed.
I noticed, Walden, but then I usually notice when a frequent poster takes a break, which we all do occasionally. I just figured you needed a break and would be back when you were ready. I didn’t realize I should have welcomed you back.
hey, I rank 90. Considering the total is 1662 that’s not all that bad…
but, who cares..
Well, I missed Beth, but I was also under the mistaken impression that she was packed in the car with all her worldly possessions, en route back to the east coast.
Walden I never missed, because I can always sense him lurking.
I’ve been too busy to keep at my run for the top 40. In fact, I’ve been so out of it that I’m in danger of slipping off the first page. I’ve obviously already lost my position as leading message board statastician!
Not to worry Jim, you can always tell what part of the country I am in by the “Location” section of my posts/profile. 
It says Rambler for a reason!