Post count as of 9/28/02:
Loren (No. 1): 1483
Avanutria (No. 2): 1468
I had no idea that anyone was even close to toppling Loren from his once untouchable lead… 
You’re so close, Beth…only one recipe thread or something else OT and Fluffie, and you’ll have him!!!
Will the winner get some of blabber-mouth award, or something?
You mean that Walden isnt #1?? Geeze, that’s a shock! 
[ This Message was edited by: Azalin on 2002-09-28 14:31 ]
I haven’t been on nearly as long as Beth and Loren.
This is not an accomplishment of which to be proud. :roll:
Best,
Chris
Don’t feel bad, some of the boards I’m on have members with well over 10,000 posts…
I’m #28 by the way. 
How in blazes did I creep up to 27th? Some of you youngsters are falling down on the job.
Oh, no! I’m losing ground! I’m only #51, right behind Jens!
I guess I ought to go through and delete my less-than-stellar posts (would that be all of them?) and get myself out of the Top Ten.
On 2002-09-29 06:12, Walden wrote:
I guess I ought to go through and delete my less-than-stellar posts (would that be all of them?) and get myself out of the Top Ten.
Sorry, Walden, that ranks up there with running a Ferrari in reverse in a vain attempt to reset the Odometer…
Beuller?
Beuller?
Beuller?
#74 and proud of it!
Brent
As of right now, I’m #29… used to be #26 or something, but I haven’t been posting as regularly as I used to b/c of time issues… sigh
But #29 is good.
All I really want is to pass Dave Migoya. I’ll admit that he’s the better fifer, but I’ll be damned if he can be the better poster!
Current Fifer Standings:
Migoya: 269 posts; rank = 54
McCabe: 268 posts; rank = 55
I won’t post fluff just to pass him. Andrea Corr image links are not fluff.
Disclaimer: for those who have been following the LA whistle shop thread, I have no commercial connection with McCabe’s of LA.
Jim_Mc(Cabe)
\
B flat or begone!
[ This Message was edited by: jim_mc on 2002-09-30 03:06 ]
[ This Message was edited by: jim_mc on 2002-09-30 03:07 ]
Have to chide you for the misleading title of your thread, Kevin. I thought we were going to have a love interest in the plot for a minute!
On 2002-09-30 10:04, StevieJ wrote:
Have to chide you for the misleading title of your thread, Kevin. I thought we were going to have a love interest in the plot for a minute!
Oh, good gravy, no. That’s all I need right now…
(Nothing personal, mind you, Loren!)
Well, if it can help you out, I’ve heard that Loren is a good lover, altough a little unstable when he’s gettin’ drunk…
PS: I’m joking, and I’m not talking from personnal experience.
PS2: That was my most intelligent post of september, let october come!
Gee, didnt mean to be misleading…
In light of all of our discussions about “Fluff” and “Fluffiness” and people who are “Fluffie”, and having become accustomed to this terminology, I was alarmed to learn over the weekend that the term “Fluffer” is a term of art in the adult film industry associated with a specialized female job description that is not Reasonable to relate here in detail…but suffice it to say that, alas, at least in my mind that once pristine term has now lost the luster of innocence.
I used to be a fluffer. Don’t be so surprised - I put myself through college on that job!
(COMPLETELY KIDDING - I WAS NEVER A FLUFFER, well at least not professionally)
~J
Jess… we appreciate your frankness.
Well, maybe they don’t, but I do.