United States counsels Syria to say "WHOA"

It seems the United States wants Syria to get with the program of WHOA and start buying US made whistles or else!

U.S. to Syria: Just say ‘whoa’



By MARCUS GEE
From Tuesday’s Globe and Mail

E-mail this Article
Print this Article






Call it the “whoa” effect.

General Tommy Franks, the U.S. commander in the Middle East, was asked on the weekend what lesson terror-sponsoring regimes should take from the defeat of Iraq’s Saddam Hussein. He said that in their shoes, he would conclude that the United States is deadly serious about stopping the spread of international terrorism and weapons of mass destruction.

“So, if I were looking for a lesson to take away, it would be, whoa, these people are really resolute in this matter,” Gen. Franks said.

One regime may already be saying whoa. Saturday, North Korea indicated that it might be willing to accept multilateral talks to resolve the nuclear crisis on the Korean peninsula. That is a big turnabout for the North, which had always insisted that it would talk only to the United States.

“It seems that North Korea is becoming a bit more flexible,” Ra Jong-yil, top security adviser to South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun, told reporters yesterday. “It appears that the war in Iraq set an important precedent in determining the geopolitical landscape.”

Washington is certainly hoping so, and it is doing its best to spread the whoa effect to other regimes. The immediate target: Syria.

Yesterday, a lineup of U.S. officials stepped forward to warn the Damascus regime to stop giving refuge to former Iraqi leaders, stop letting foreign fighters travel to Iraq through Syria, stop developing weapons of mass destruction and stop harbouring terrorists.

White House spokesman Ari Fleischer called Syria a “terrorist state” and a “rogue nation.” He produced a Central Intelligence Agency report documenting Syria’s pursuit of chemical and biological weapons.

Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld accused Damascus of carrying out chemical-weapons tests and allowing Iraqis to flee into Syrian territory.

Secretary of State Colin Powell warned Damascus to adapt to the “new environment” or face diplomatic or economic pressure.

All of that followed Sunday’s comments by President George W. Bush, who prominently accused Syria of similar misbehaviour. Taken together, the warnings had an ominous sound, and they were meant to.

It’s highly unlikely that Washington will soon follow its victory in Iraq with an attack on neighbouring Syria. (Mr. Bush’s closest ally, British Prime Minister Tony Blair, said yesterday there are “no plans whatsoever” to invade Syria.) Yet it is clear that Washington hopes the dramatic display of U.S. power and determination in Iraq will persuade others to clean up their act.

Washington is focusing first on Syria partly because it is genuinely angry about Syrian moves to supply war material to the Iraqi regime and shelter its fleeing officials.

The United States thought it could count on Syria to stay out of the Iraq conflict. Syria supported last fall’s United Nations resolution calling on Iraq to disarm and it has co-operated with the United States in its wider war against terrorism, but now the Americans feel betrayed.

Washington is also genuinely concerned about Syrian support for terrorism. Damascus has played host to an array of terrorist groups, including the Palestinian Hamas organization, responsible for many suicide bombings against Israelis, and Hezbollah, the Lebanese-based, Iranian-funded group that U.S. deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage has called the “A-team of terrorism.”

Washington is clearly amplifying its anger in order to intimidate Damascus. Mr. Bush’s government has previously shown no great concern about Syrian weapons of mass destruction; raising the issue makes for a frightening echo after Iraq was invaded for the stated reason of its pursuit of such weapons.

Yesterday, Syria vehemently denied it has chemical weapons or that it has ever co-operated with Mr. Hussein’s regime. Those denials cut no ice in Washington.

Almost immediately after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Mr. Bush said that from then on, Washington would make no distinction between terrorists and the regimes that support them. If Syria did not get the message then, it is hearing it loud and clear now.


Hhummm it seems that whistles are now a secret weapon of US diplomacy.

MarkB

He said that in their shoes, he would conclude that the United States is deadly serious about stopping the spread of international terrorism and weapons of mass destruction.

They still haven’t found them.

Not having found any whistles of mass destruction in Iraq, we can now follow the yellow cake road to Damascus, where they whistle lower than anyone else. In the end it’s all about no one wanting to play in session with Israel, because it only knows one tune (Hava Nagila) and smacks anyone who wants to play anything else. But we, who have more whistles than anyone has ever had, ever, in the history of whistling, and who play even lower than the Iraqis, happen to like that tune, as long as it is played..over there.., and insist that they all sit down and listen to it. So lots of whistles are today being swung through the air by crazed and circumcized peoples. Will they ever have a happy session? :sniffle:

Actually Hava Nagila is partly in the Ahava-Rabba mode and that mode is also used in Arabic music under the name Hijazz Makam. So there is something in common.

The important thing is that we must protect copper pipes that could potentially become whistles from being made into pipe bombs by terrorists. Send out the whistle inspection team!

“They” said they will, and on this I trust them.
If you’re really serious about WhOA, a whistle you can’t find, you can always make.
Who cares if it’s in tune? Or only playable? It’s only for a TV show, right?

On this line… doesn’t it strike you Ressikan (flute) is the anagram of Irak Ness ?
For short, just call it NESSIE…

I also trust them. I think the whistles should be
sent to Iraq, to accompany people
dancing in the streets.

Let’s see how long the dancing lasts.

I heard that the US Marines turned off the pipes to Syria. Has anyone else heard this?

Oh, Syria, the pipes
the pipes are…

I understand that it is true. Otto von Bismark would be proud. He was the lowest whistler of his generation.

Dancing never lasts long–the way of the world.
But whatever follows for the Iraqi people,
it’s unlikely to compare to what preceded,
which is why they were dancing. Hard
not to be glad for them.

Hard
not to be glad for them.

Yes. It’s so hard not to be glad for all of them that are DEAD, or worse off, have no arms like the 12 year old boy that was just flown to Kuwait for treatment. I’m so glad for them. Sheesh.

Can you put the point of your
post in other words? I’m sure you are making
a point, but I’m not sure what it is. Best

P.S. I’ve worked a lot with disabled people
by the way, and I think it’s worse to be
dead than to have no arms.

Can you put the point of your
post in other words? I’m sure you are making
a point, but I’m not sure what it is. Best

I know I have a point, too, but I also don’t really know what it is. :sniffle:

Well, neither of us is glad for the dead and wounded, I’m
sure, whoever they may be.