That sort of idea was behind the second half of the question “showing that they haven’t done much reading of older posts here before joining in”. Like hanging around a session to get a feel of the way things go before joining in.
I was going to say that the low incidence of slagging with you folks over there was refreshing - until the system showed me the crossing posts
Nice catch… but you missed the space between ‘aires’ and ‘[sic’!
Was just about to suggest that’s not incompatible with not (yes, I have the right negatives in the right places!) buying into the whole ‘Brigadoon’ thing…
But say ‘get thee to a Herefordshire/Gloucestershire border fayre’ instead!
Oddly enough, I’ve known folks who’d been around sessions and workshops long enough so that you’d think they’d just absorb the idea, but left uncorrected, they’ll still say “song” out of habit until the issue is pointed out to them. Seldom have I ever heard a beginner ask, “Why do you say ‘tunes’? Is there a special reason for that?” German Whistler did ask this. An alert mind can be a refreshing thing.
However, I don’t think we can justify expecting people to think to ask about this - that is, if they’ve even noticed. It’s just the way it is. You can’t really know what someone knows or doesn’t know until they speak. Then - maybe - you have a learning opportunity. It’s a good argument for being nice to people about it.
Think he deserves that column-stretching-location when Herefs./Glos. (despite being even uglier and no more comprehensible) would fit? Or could you (as fellow Mod) just change it to Brigadoon for him?
Och, just one more… going to edit Ben’s location? (Pretty please?)
You have no idea. I just knew you were lurking somewhere. Do you think that after making a statement like that, that I was going to buckle? I was hoping you would have replied, “For now, you mean.” To which I was going to answer, "Naturally. "
When I’m using the word “tune” in reference to a whole, as in “this tune” or “that tune”, I would use “melody” to describe its contents. Not saying it’s the right way over all, but it seems to make more sense to say, “This tune’s melody is pretty straightforward,” than the other way around.
Otherwise, “tune” and “melody” can sometimes be interchangeable. You can say, “How does that tune go?” and substitute the word “melody” just fine. But I wouldn’t say, “That sarabande’s tune is stunning.”
Then there’s, “We’d better tune. It’s making listening to the melody a chore.”
Pretty much what I thought, but for some reason, when I think of melody I just think of the series of notes but not necessarily the meter, time and phrasing. Pretty sure melody covers more, but that is how it stuck in my mind.