Hmmm, I see what you mean now. It see,s distinctly odd and is not something that would occur in any traditional style I am familiar with. To which I add I am blissfully unaware of any style of low whistle playing, and deliberately so, so perhaps it’s something you find there. Still seems odd though, at least the way it’s written in your example.
Surely a typesetting mistake. If you provide ABC for the last few bars of the section concerned, or a scan of the page, we should be able to solve the mystery.
X: 1
T: 7th measure A part 2nd variation (the one in question)
K: G
FAA2{B}A2{G}A2
Not a roll then (I would think of a roll as a rhythmic device and that’s not how it would turn out on those last two As) but assuming the first long A gets a roll FA~A2 you get two long As of which the first one gets separated by a cut and the second a tap. One way of doing it I suppose.
Alternatively you could go all Willie Clancy or Johnny Doran/traveller style multiple rolling : FA~A2 ~A2 ~A2 Which, perhaps, would be a more common approach (or at least one I’d be more familiar with, hearing it around the place).
I agree with Mr. Gumby. Those are just two long notes with articulations at the front of each of them. Probably the cut and tap are there to give a slightly different flavour to each of the A’s.