[quote="dhigbee
But I want tonal uniformity, comfortable fingerspacing, the ability to easily play accidentals without compromising the ability to slide and ornament, plus sound colors and textures of my own making! (In other words, my Nirvana of flutes…)
Dana
(Always searching for Superflute)[/quote]
If your Nirvana of flutes has tonal uniformity and comfortable fingerspacing, the ability to easily play accidentals, etc., you really ought to think about a wooden, open-holed Boehm… set you back about 11K, but… Most of your other descriptions can be faked on a Boehm, but most conical flutes don’t allow for (or want) tonal uniformity, and lord knows the keying system is not for the lazy, once you’re into multiple flats or sharps territory.
My earlier response, BTW, was entirely about Cnat fingering(s), and not about Eb, or other incidentals. I was also only talking about ITM, which doesn’t demand these incidentals for most of it’s almost unlimited repetoire. One-key baroques are wonderfully simple chromatic flutes (with the Eb/D# key also used as a necessary vent for F# and other high notes into the third octave), but if you’re bothered by slightly weaker notes among strong, and only want equal-temperament tuning, not to mention ballsy and loud volume overall, a traverso probably really isn’t for you. Not to mention that the best sounding ones are in low pitch.
If you really must play Ebs, or Bbs or other non-ITM notes on a 19th c. based flute, I fully agree that a key is probably what you’ll need, and if you need an Eb/D# key, you probably will want an Fnat, long and short, and a Bb, and G# as well. And then, hell, long as you’re there, you might want to go for the Cnat. key. But I was under the impression that the original question was for ITM, and how important are keys, especially the C nat. And I still say that it’s not at all.
Gordon