Kenny G as Necrophile (...Long Post....)

This sparked lively debate on another board. I’m not sure what the source of the interview text was, but I got a kick out of it…


Pat Metheny on Kenny G:
Question:
Pat, could you tell us your opinion about Kenny G - it appears you were quoted as being less than enthusiastic about him and his music. I would say that most of the serious music listeners in the world would not find your opinion surprising or unlikely - but you were vocal about it for the first time. You are generally supportive of other musicians it seems.

Pat’s Answer:
Kenny G is not a musician I really had much of an opinion about at all until recently. There was not much about the way he played that interested me one way or the other either live or on records.

I first heard him a number of years ago playing as a sideman with Jeff Lorber when they opened a concert for my band. My impression was that he was someone who had spent a fair amount of time listening to the more pop oriented sax players of that time, like Grover Washington or David Sanborn, but was not really an advanced player, even in that style. He had major rhythmic problems and his harmonic and melodic vocabulary was extremely limited, mostly to pentatonic based and blues-lick derived patterns, and he basically exhibited only a rudimentary understanding of how to function as a professional soloist in an ensemble - Lorber was basically playing him off the bandstand in terms of actual music.

But he did show a knack for connecting to the basest impulses of the large crowd by deploying his two or three most effective licks (holding long notes and playing fast runs - never mind that there were lots of harmonic clams in them) at the key moments to elicit a powerful crowd reaction (over and over again). The other main thing I noticed was that he also, as he does to this day, played horribly out of tune - consistently sharp.

Of course, I am aware of what he has played since, the success it has had, and the controversy that has surrounded him among musicians and serious listeners. This controversy seems to be largely fueled by the fact that he sells an enormous amount of records while not being anywhere near a really great player in relation to the standards that have been set on his instrument over the past sixty or seventy years. And honestly, there is no small amount of envy involved from musicians who see one of their fellow players doing so well financially, especially when so many of them who are far superior as improvisors and musicians in general have trouble just making a living. There must be hundreds, if not thousands of sax players around the world who are simply better improvising musicians than Kenny G on his chosen instruments. It would really surprise me if even he disagreed with that statement.

Having said that, it has gotten me to thinking lately why so many jazz musicians (myself included, given the right “bait” of a question, as I will explain later) and audiences have gone so far as to say that what he is playing is not even jazz at all. Stepping back for a minute, if we examine the way he plays, especially if one can remove the actual improvising from the often mundane background environment that it is delivered in, we see that his saxophone style is in fact clearly in the tradition of the kind of playing that most reasonably objective listeners WOULD normally quantify as being jazz. It’s just that as jazz or even as music in a general sense, with these standards in mind, it is simply not up to the level of playing that we historically associate with professional improvising musicians. So, lately I have been advocating that we go ahead and just include it under the word jazz - since pretty much of the rest of the world OUTSIDE of the jazz community does anyway - and let the chips fall where they may.

And after all, why he should be judged by any other standard, why he should be exempt from that that all other serious musicians on his instrument are judged by if they attempt to use their abilities in an improvisational context playing with a rhythm section as he does? He SHOULD be compared to John Coltrane or Wayne Shorter, for instance, on his abilities (or lack thereof) to play the soprano saxophone and his success (or lack thereof) at finding a way to deploy that instrument in an ensemble in order to accurately gauge his abilities and put them in the context of his instrument’s legacy and potential.

As a composer of even eighth note based music, he SHOULD be compared to Herbie Hancock, Horace Silver or even Grover Washington. Suffice it to say, on all above counts, at this point in his development, he wouldn’t fare well.

But, like I said at the top, this relatively benign view was all “until recently”.

Not long ago, Kenny G put out a recording where he overdubbed himself on top of a 30+ year old Louis Armstrong record, the track “What a Wonderful World”. With this single move, Kenny G became one of the few people on earth I can say that I really can’t use at all - as a man, for his incredible arrogance to even consider such a thing, and as a musician, for presuming to share the stage with the single most important figure in our music.

This type of musical necrophilia - the technique of overdubbing on the preexisting tracks of already dead performers - was weird when Natalie Cole did it with her dad on “Unforgettable” a few years ago, but it was her dad. When Tony Bennett did it with Billie Holiday it was bizarre, but we are talking about two of the greatest singers of the 20th century who were on roughly the same level of artistic accomplishment. When Larry Coryell presumed to overdub himself on top of a Wes Montgomery track, I lost a lot of the respect that I ever had for him - and I have to seriously question the fact that I did have respect for someone who could turn out to have such unbelievably bad taste and be that disrespectful to one of my personal heroes.

But when Kenny G decided that it was appropriate for him to defile the music of the man who is probably the greatest jazz musician that has ever lived by spewing his lame-ass, jive, pseudo bluesy, out-of-tune, noodling, wimped out, **ed up playing all over one of the great Louis’s tracks (even one of his lesser ones), he did something that I would not have imagined possible. He, in one move, through his unbelievably pretentious and calloused musical decision to embark on this most cynical of musical paths, sh all over the graves of all the musicians past and present who have risked their lives by going out there on the road for years and years developing their own music inspired by the standards of grace that Louis Armstrong brought to every single note he played over an amazing lifetime as a musician. By disrespecting Louis, his legacy and by default, everyone who has ever tried to do something positive with improvised music and what it can be, Kenny G has created a new low point in modern culture - something that we all should be totally embarrassed about - and afraid of. We ignore this, “let it slide”, at our own peril.

His callous disregard for the larger issues of what this crass gesture implies is exacerbated by the fact that the only reason he possibly have for doing something this inherently wrong (on both human and musical terms) was for the record sales and the money it would bring.

Since that record came out - in protest, as insignificant as it may be, I encourage everyone to boycott Kenny G recordings, concerts and anything he is associated with. If asked about Kenny G, I will diss him and his music with the same passion that is in evidence in this little essay.

Normally, I feel that musicians all have a hard enough time, regardless of their level, just trying to play good and don’t really benefit from public criticism, particularly from their fellow players. but, this is different.

There ARE some things that are sacred - and amongst any musician that has ever attempted to address jazz at even the most basic of levels, Louis Armstrong and his music is hallowed ground. To ignore this trespass is to agree that NOTHING any musician has attempted to do with their life in music has any intrinsic value - and I refuse to do that. (I am also amazed that there HASN’T already been an outcry against this among music critics - where ARE they on this!!!, magazines, etc.). Everything I said here is exactly the same as what I would say to Gorelick if I ever saw him in person. and if I ever DO see him anywhere, at any function - he WILL get a piece of my mind and (maybe a guitar wrapped around his head.)

NOTE: this post is partially in response to the comments that people have made regarding a short video interview excerpt with me that was posted on the internet taken from a tv show for young people (kind of like MTV)in poland where i was asked to address 8 to 11 year old kids on terms that they could understand about jazz. while enthusiastically describing the virtues of this great area of music, i was encouraging the kids to find and listen to some of the greats in the music and not to get confused by the sometimes overwhelming volume of music that falls under the jazz umbrella. i went on to say that i think that for instance, kenny g plays the dumbest music on the planet – something that all 8 to 11 year kids on the planet already intrinsically know, as anyone who has ever spent any time around kids that age could confirm - so it gave us some common ground for the rest of the discussion. (ADDENDUM: the only thing wrong with the statement that i made was that i did not include the rest of the known universe.) the fact that this clip was released so far out of the context that it was delivered in is a drag, but it is now done. (its unauthorized release out of context like that is symptomatic of the new electronically interconnected culture that we now live in - where pretty much anything anyone anywhere has ever said or done has the potential to become common public property at any time.) i was surprised by the polish people putting this clip up so far away from the use that it was intended -really just for the attention - with no explanation of the show it was made for - they (the polish people in general) used to be so hip and would have been unlikely candidates to do something like that before, but i guess everything is changing there like it is everywhere else. the only other thing that surprised me in the aftermath of the release of this little interview is that ANYONE would be even a little bit surprised that i would say such a thing, given the reality of mr. gs music. this makes me want to go practice about 10 times harder, because that suggests to me that i am not getting my own musical message across clearly enough - which to me, in every single way and intention is diametrically opposed to what Kenny G seems to be after.

Well, interesting, certainly, but I really don’t have much patience with this kind of thing.

No ill on you for posting it here, of course.

–James

I retract that statement.
According to wikipedia, the Metheny article is at least 8 years old…

Also from the wikipedia article on Kenny G:

Right, I apologize for dredging up old mud-slinging. It’s old news.

I guess what really interested me was not Metheny’s rant as much as the debate it stirred. People who really love music can have very strong feelings about it. That happened to be a jazz-related forum. To me, the ensuing discussion mirrored the kind of debate that takes place at C&F over the whole idea about traditional versus “contemporary” Celtic music. It’s a question that has no correct answer, of course.

Yeah, it’s weird, isn’t it? I was just discovering jazz in high school when Kenny
G was at his peak. The level of revulsion felt toward him was surprising, and
maybe misplaced: I met many people who come to jazz by first hearing Kenny G.

Likewise, there are folks who come to ITM after seeing Riverdance.
Bluegrass/Oldtime had a resurgence after Oh Brother, Where Art Thou?
came out.

Mainstream, watered down acts may annoy the people who are already
faithful to a genre, but they bring in new blood to keep the faith alive.
“Crossover” artists serve the same purpose. We shouldn’t be playa-hatin’.

Not sure how I feel about the necromancy part, specifically. I’m sure there’s
a certain amount of “sacred ground” that you have to be careful of. If Kenny
had played over a Benny Goodman track, would Metheny feel such rage?

mighta cut 'im some slack if he squeaked over the break. :stuck_out_tongue:

I had never seen the quotation. I am surprised. I always thought it was just amateurs that hated Kenny G. I had no idea that he went out and earned the animus among pros.

A lot of musicians measure their words carefully when it comes to others in the profession who are just, after all, trying to make a living. Only when you are a young snot do you typically make fun of somebody else’s act. After a million gigs and watching how audiences take pleasure in many things that make you wince, it becomes kind of humbling and you realize that the very best thing is not always the best-received thing. There is a place for even gimmicky acts if they make the people happy. For the most part, I find fans are more critical than pros, at least publicly.

Years ago, I passed up the opportunity to review concerts for the local paper because I honestly felt really uncomfortable criticizing others when I was so relatively young. Sure, I could write snappy copy, etc. but I was really ambivalent about it. I still hold critics of all arts at an arms distance. I know that they can actually enhance and add to understanding of art, but…

It seems like ol’ Kenny really crossed some lines with the recording. But it’s pretty typical of the corporate franchise approach. Once the Nat Cole thing happened, it was only natural that every agent would try and get a piece of the pizzazz pizza…

Hey, did I tell ya about my new podcast of me playin with the 1975 Chieftains? Yessirree, it’s pure droplet!!!

I can’t remember…have the Hank Williams’s had their family reunion sing-along yet? :laughing:

Bocephus is NOT his daddy!!! :smiley:

You know, I was reading the first post and thinking, This is arguably controversial stuff.

Yet somehow I just don’t seem to have it in me to care. Imagine that. :wink:

Of course, I am aware of what he has played since, the success it has had, and the controversy that has surrounded him among musicians and serious listeners. This controversy seems to be largely fueled by the fact that he sells an enormous amount of records while not being anywhere near a really great player in relation to the standards that have been set on his instrument over the past sixty or seventy years. And honestly, there is no small amount of envy involved from musicians who see one of their fellow players doing so well financially, especially when so many of them who are far superior as improvisors and musicians in general have trouble just making a living. There must be hundreds, if not thousands of sax players around the world who are simply better improvising musicians than Kenny G on his chosen instruments. It would really surprise me if even he disagreed with that statement.

Nail on the head.

What I find most surprising about this is that much of Pat Metheny’s music is cut from the same milquetoast cloth that Kenny G’s music is. “Easy Listening Jazz”

Where is the harm in using the sounds and works from dead musicians in new contemporary publications. I think Metheny is missing a point here. Just because the musician is put in a box, doesn’t mean their music can’t live on. I’m no fan of Kenny G, but the reason that Metheny offers for his apparent detest of Kenny G is that he over dubbed pentatonic scales on a 2:19 recording that is 40 years old (a POP recording at that, not a Jazz recording). That seems a little jive-assed in an of itself…

That article is one “footnote” in jazz history, commenting on another. Neither being giants in the formation or promotion of the craft of jazz. Kenny G just happened to understand that when appealing to the “basest impulses” of a crowd, they are likely to spend gobs of money on records.

Did I mention that this article taught me that Kenny G’s last name is “Gorelick”?
'Cause that’s awesome. Gorelick. Say it three times without saying “Ew”, I dare you.

2nd that one :laughing:

Although I do like Pat better than Kenny or Grover…

I wonder about the pronunciation. If it’s a variant of Garelick, which it looks to be, then it’s Russian and would be pronounced “guh RELic” by many who have the name. But, of course, these things get changed. If I were in Kenny’s shoes and MY surname was pronounced “GORE lick”, I’d for sure go with “G”, too. It’s snappier.

GORE lick

local boy…

Anybody wanna hear my recording of myself playing the kazoo over Pablo Casals’s 1939 recording of the Bach Cello Suites?

Pat did get his knickers in a twist, didn’t he? I’m of no mind to defend Kenny G, who I can’t stand to listen to for a half-second, but Kenny’s lack of taste isn’t exactly a newsflash and I agree that some of Pat’s body of work does tend to veer off into SlickLand. Anyway, Louis Armstrong can take care of himself, even in his present state of, uh, lateness.

I (and I’m sure lots of people) always thought Kenny G was a terrible improviser, so it’s not a matter of whether he played light jazz or not, it’s whether he played it well or not. I would accept Metheny’s stuff as being well/skilfully played and well-improvised, even if lots of it can be described as easily palatable light jazz or fusion.

Like you, I don’t see why Metheny is so upset over KG playing over Louis Armstrong’s stuff. He seems upset over the principle of the act, not just the execution of it (I’ve not listened to it so I dunno how bad it sounds). I don’t think that the concept per se of laying a track over another [dead?] person’s music is so heinous.

If it’s badly done, then just don’t listen to it. Frankly, Kenny G is not worth busting a blood vessel over. And one thing in his favour: if his pitching was sharp, it wasn’t noticeable to me.

Back in the '80s his sister played mandolin in our old timey/contradance string band here in Seattle. Our repertoire included a number of Irish tunes, so FWIW Kenny G is at least related to someone who has played ITM. Not that that has any bearing on anything that’s been discussed above. Just felt like sharing.

Ming

Well, at least he played well enough to make a living at it. I could never make the same claim. Plus, on the good side, he has provided elevator music for the next several generations. :smiley:

Nice rant. Even though it is supported by a lot of strong opinions it’s still a sorry excuse for a bad case of professional envy. Pat should just get off of it. Judging by the colossal amount of time that he must have spent composing that screed he has too much damn time on his hands.