Does anyone know if there’s sheet music available for “the Immigrant” by Keane/Madden?
I personally think it’s one of the most hauntingly beautiful songs from the “Song of the Irish whsitle” CD.
Does anyone know if there’s sheet music available for “the Immigrant” by Keane/Madden?
I personally think it’s one of the most hauntingly beautiful songs from the “Song of the Irish whsitle” CD.
I have it!
<>…
Cool! Where did you get it? Is it in a book? Where can I obtain it, and for how much?
I’ve figured most it out by ear, but I’d like to get a copy of the sheet music as well.
Thanks,
Frank
I wrote it down from the CD. There is only melody and the guitar chords. I would have to send it to you by regular mail. You have my email. JP
Danger Will Robinson!!!
This is going in to a delicate subject of Copyright. Unlike most whistle music - which is public domain - “The Immigrant” is copyrighted by Keane/Madden.
I’ve got the music mostly figured out. I wanted a copy of the sheet music for my personal collection.
Thanks anyway,
Frank
Dr. Smith,
Let me know which measures you need to know which notes or chords!
Will
Ummm … wouldn’t that be: Dear Dr Smith’s Robot? ![]()
FE
You’re right! Darn, I guess I’m just not old enough to remember such details (43).
Then again, it could be a brain cell thing. I’m 43 too. ![]()
Okay … this copyright thing got me going, 'cause I would have said two people exchanging the worked-out notation of a copywrited tune for private use (no exchange of money and nobody was going to perform the tune for money) would have been okay.
So I looked up intellectual property and copyright stuff and discovered this:
“Copyright law secures for the creator of a creative effort the exclusive right to control who can make copies, or make works derived from the original work. … If you create something, and it fits the definition of a creative work, you get to control who can make copies of it and how they make copies.” (citation: Brad Templeton)
That being the case, it would seem to me learning a copyrighted tune by ear is essentially “making a copy.” So if I’m sitting in the privacy of my home, playing along to copyrighted music (anything not in the public domain), I’m technically violating copyright law? There’s a thought!
Or is it a copy only if I copy the disc? Or write down what I think the notes are? Or play the copy in public (for free)?
Obviously, there’s a sensibility factor that comes into play. Even if I am breaching copyright by making ephemeral aural copies in the privacy of my home, I suspect Joanie Madden is not going to haul me off to civil court (after all, the people who hold copyrights on Star Trek don’t go after the folks who write “fan fiction”). And were I in her position, I don’t think I’d be fussed about Sue passing the notes along to her friend Amy, 'cause Amy couldn’t quite figure them all out by ear.
But somewhere, there’s a critical boundary. And clearly, we all make a choice about the degree to which we honour the letter of the law.
It’s so confusing! ![]()
[ This Message was edited by: FairEmma on 2001-07-08 02:13 ]
[ This Message was edited by: FairEmma on 2001-07-08 02:19 ]
So, aren’t you a little young to up so late?
Anyway, please tell me about these wooden whistles you talked about in another thread. How are they, price, etc? Are they easy to order?
Thanks,
John
Actually, after the Napster hearings, the Laws regarding copying music has been modified somewhat. Emma, I think you’re safe if you learn a song - especially from ear. As long as you don’t start saying that you wrote “What do you do with a drunken sailor?”, we’ll be fine ![]()
The parts I’m having difficulty with are specifically the accordian and telling where the acoustic guitar vs. the harp guitar are playing. The melody itself is relatively simple Having the sheet music was primarily for my collection. I’ll try to contact Hearts O’ Space in the near future and see if it’s for sale.
Thanks again,
Frank
Dear Frank.
Via rebels, change!
As a writer, I value that the second anything I write appears in tangible form, it is irrefutably my property (although the issue of “copy” is bit more straight-forward in regard to the printed word). In theory, I support this for any creation.
However, I find the complex issues of copyright, especially when they pertain to music (even original composition and arrangements of tune) that proudly positions itself within the ancient and organic heritage of aural transmission and individual interpretation, intriguing.
Now, back to playing along with Grey Larsen! ![]()
Dear John,
I think it’s rather I’m too old for that hour, but my eyes simply wouldn’t close. ![]()
I did write a review of the Boudreau set for Dale, and it is currently appearing in his Chiff News section, along with the pictures I took.
Since I wrote that review shortly upon receipt, I’ve had more time to get acquainted. These whistles are on the louder end of the spectrum, although not to Susato class. They are clear, in that there is little chiff or breathiness. They are on the full or round side, with a more resonant quality than, say, my Copeland, but do not sound at all recorder-like to me. They are cheerful and bright, as a whistle should be.
There is a quality to the tone that I’m hard-pressed to define … I’m going to say it is a subtle, reedy “whine” (not at all an objectionable whine - more like a lover’s moan) that makes the sound more complex. I happen to like it very well.
The three bodies and interchangeable head are superbly crafted … of boxwood (I think - rather stupidly I’m unsure), a rich varigated and grained golden color that is enhance by the hand-rubbed, oiled finish. The wood around the fipple is of a contrasting colour. Finger holes are slightly bevelled at the edges. I figure folks would either love or hate the profile - it isn’t classically “whistle.”
The B-flat is my favourite body … and plays easily along the range. It’s tone is compelling. Both the C and B-flat come up aces against my tuner. I’m having a bit of difficulty with octave-flipping on second register A and B with the D body … but then, I’m never superalitve up there with most whistles, so I’m going to say the fault there lies with me. I play the D along fine with MIDI files, or to CDs, and yet against my tuner, it appears consistently flat across the range (that’s pushed in all the way, so I can’t sharp the tone by pushing in more). I do plan on discussing this with Jean-Luc when I meet him in August. The instruments have a year guarantee (and a two-week period of unconditional return after receipt), and he is such a pleasant fellow to work with, I can’t imagine there will be a problem.
Jean-Luc has a website, but it’s all about his recorder manufacture, so you won’t find any whistle information there. Best just to enter an e-mail dialogue with him. He has been very responsive and prompt. His e-mail: Jean-Luc Boudreau, flutes@colba.net.
I hope this is helpful.
best,
FE
On 2001-07-08 02:11, FairEmma wrote:
“Copyright law secures for the creator of a creative effort the exclusive right to control who can make copies, or make works derived from the original work. … If you create something, and it fits the definition of a creative work, you get to control who can make copies of it and how they make copies.” (citation: Brad Templeton)
That being the case, it would seem to me learning a copyrighted tune by ear is essentially “making a copy.”
It is, except that your copy would fall under Fair Use guidelines, since you’re using it for nonprofit educational use.
Or is it a copy only if I copy the disc? Or write down what I think the notes are? Or play the copy in public (for free)?
Copying the disc and giving the copy to someone else is unquestionably not fair use; playing in public for free is more of a grey area. If you play the tune, you’re scot-free; if you play someone’s recorded arrangement, it’s probably a violation. (You don’t have to make money off of it to make it a violation of copyright; consider trading software on a BBS.)
Obviously, there’s a sensibility factor that comes into play. Even if I am breaching copyright by making ephemeral aural copies in the privacy of my home, I suspect Joanie Madden is not going to haul me off to civil court (after all, the people who hold copyrights on Star Trek don’t go after the folks who write “fan fiction”).
They do quite often, but they usually reserve it for the extremes.
And were I in her position, I don’t think I’d be fussed about Sue passing the notes along to her friend Amy, 'cause Amy couldn’t quite figure them all out by ear.
And here fair use comes in again, messier. Transcriptions are a standard part of jazz education, and transcribing and sharing transcriptions is common practice (including within university curricula, which suggests legality to me). But a transcription of a jazz tune is of one person’s solo – 10 to 50% of the tune – and an important aspect of fair use is that you use a /part/ of the original (like, for instance, quotations in an academic journal). Transcribing a whole tune yourself isn’t problematic because it’s for your education and because you’ve paid for rights to use the music yourself; giving a transcription of an entire tune to someone else is considerably greyer.
I am not a lawyer, and the above is not legal advice.
I am willing to purchase the original sheet music for J. Maddens CD’s if they are available. Does anyone know?
Thanks
Hello there - Joanie Madden here - don’t worry about the copyright thing - I’m not going to haul you off to jail!
Thanks for wanting to learn the immigrant!
Good Luck,
Joanie
If you dig back several pages, you will find what I brought up on copyright "Paranoia..
And so it goes again
Mark
Copyright laws also vary by country. Due to Bill C-32 (1997) which amended Canada’s copyright law it became (1998)perfectly legal to make copies “for personal use” from original, copyrighted recorded music in Canada. Note that there are several restrictions such as the copy cannot be used for public performance, the copy must be from an original, and the copy cannot be distributed. To offset the loss a revenue to the music industry a levy (aka tax) was placed on blank CDR media. In effect, this means I can legally borrow Rich’s “Chieftains” CD, make a copy for myself, and return his CD to him so long as the copy is for my own “private use”. Similar copyright laws exist in other countries. Don’t believe me? Look it up for yourself at the following URLs.
For more information see “INFORMATION ON THE
PRIVATE COPYING PROVISIONS
OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT” at http://www.pch.gc.ca/culture/cult_ind/back3.htm
For Bill C-32 see: http://www.parl.gc.ca/bills/government/C-32/C-32_3/C-32_cover-E.html
For the Canadian Copyright Act see: http://www.cb-cda.gc.ca/info/act-e.html
Gary
P.S. Joanie, is that really you?