How do 2 whistlers play together without it sounding boring?

How about a little context and tolerance? Sure, if you want to stay strictly within the traditional Irish music framework, the harmonizing may be out of place. However…not everyone is too obsessed with Irish music (as I and you are). Some people even play country and western on whistle. Considering this, a little helpful advice about musicality might be nice. If someone specifically requests information about pure drop harmonizing, the ‘ridiculous’ caution would be more suited.

I usually stay out of this kind of discussion, but something’s in the air.
Tony

edit: it took me so long to get this posted (at work) two more posts showed up in the meantime. I went back and reread the original starting post; it didn’t say the poster was a bad player or compensating for incompetence. I seem to recall that lollycross plays in a band and, I assume, knows a few tunes well.


Clips](http://nwparalegal.com/clipssnip/newspage.htm%22%3EClips) and Snips Tunes
The key to success in life is sincerity. When you learn to fake that, you have it made." -Oscar Wilde

[ This Message was edited by: TonyHiggins on 2002-07-01 18:55 ]

My wife and I picked up a copy of Jazz for Pennywhistlin’ from Two Horns Music Publishing. It has some fun jazz-style duets that we’ve enjoyed.

Same with m,y friend and she is more advanced than I am. We Bought The Piper’s Companion, books Vol 1 and Volume 2 Arranged by Derek Hobbs. Blurb says. Duets and trios for Northumbrian Small pipes and other Instruments. There are some very simple duets in bothe books. Winster Gallop.Jimmy Allan. Because he was a bonny LAd. we tried 3 recorders on Archies fancy as my friend can’t play the whistle. It works great.E-mail for address if you are interested. It’s not on the web.

Not a flame, really, just a question: How is someone who is new to this game supposed to know these things without asking? How are they to know in advance that they shouldn’t ask here?

It’s not a rhetorical question. I’d like someone to explain it to me.

Tony,
You are quite right. I should be more tolerant. Thanks for reminding me.

Neil,
That’s a really, really good question and one that merits a good answer. Really, one can not expect a new whistler to know all these things. However, one would think that they’d want to learn them. My experience here, a source of frustration, is that many new players, and a lot of the people who have been playing for a long time but are still not any good do not want to hear any sound advice about improving their playing. Rather, they reject advice and knowledge that could help them a lot, even going so far as to verbally attack those who offer the advice. I’m not just talking about myself here.
For a while I had a notion that I was a decent whistle player. Every time I listened to a good whistle CD that notion melted away a bit, but gradually came back because I was not in an environment where there were whistlers who were better than me. Then I went to Ireland and I was thoroughly, totally and completely humbled. I asked about ornamentation and my teachers said “How about you learn rhythm, tone and the tune first. No sense in trying to run before you can walk”. That was the best piece of advice I ever got on the whistle. It was straightforward and honest. Exactly what I needed. I spent the remaining three months in Ireland listening intently to the brilliant whistle and flute players around me, trying to figure out what they were doing, asking questions, asking for lessons, practicing like crazy. Every time I heard some great music it reminded me what a poor player I was and how great the whistle could sound in the right hands. I had two options - break my whistle in two and give up Irish music for a promising career as a crossing guard or practice my butt off and really learn how to play. I chose the latter.
When I came back from Boston I thought I was finally a pretty decent player. Moving to Boston demonstrated clearly and without any touchy-feely niceness that I was most certainly NOT a decent whistle player and was a downright crap flute player. I didn’t know the tunes. My rhythm was poor. My tone was poor. It was a bad scene. So I started listening very, very closely to my CDs and worked harder than ever on learning the tunes and the techniques. I went to sessions as much as I could and just sat and listened, watching the lips and fingers of the flute players around me - trying to decipher what they were up to. I begged Peter Molloy (Matt Molloy’s son) for lessons, and finally he agreed.
At the start of our first lesson I told him “Listen, Peter, I know I’m a crap player and you telling me I’m a decent one isn’t going to get me anywhere. I want you to be honest with me. I want you to tell me when my tone is crap, when my rhythm is crap, when my ornaments are crap. I want you to be completely honest with me because I want to become a good flute player.”
He said “Okay, well your tone is crap, your rhythm is crap, your ornaments are crap and you don’t know enough tunes. Will you work hard enough to become a real flute player?” I answered, “Darn right I will”.
The last handful of months I’ve worked harder than ever before and the progress has been tremendous. I’m still a crap flute player, but I’m getting better. I won’t be satisfied until I sound like Catherine McEvoy - and then I still probably won’t be satisfied.
What I’m saying here is that becoming a good musician requires recognizing that you are a bad musician and that you are going to have to work darn hard to become a good musician. After recognizing those facts you have to actually do the work. That is the ONLY way to become a good musician. There are no shortcuts. No amount of round playing, harmonizing, trick ornaments or anything like that is going to make up for lazyness when it comes to really learning how to play the instrument.
I love that so many people here play out of shear enjoyment without a care about every becoming good players. That’s wonderful. However, I get really frustrated when people ask for advice on how to become good whistle players and then reject good advice when it’s given, favoring instead the lazy path to poor musicianship.
Best,
Chris

On 2002-07-01 19:24, ndjr wrote:
How is someone who is new to this game supposed to know these things without asking? How are they to know in advance that they shouldn’t ask here?

First, the person who asked the question is by no means new around here.

Second, unless I’m missing something, no-one said that the question shouldn’t have been asked.

Lolly,

Interesting question and good replies. I ran across a book at a folk music campout called “Fiddlers Philharmonic”. A fiddler and whistle player were having some fun with it and it looks like a couple of whistlers might could use it with whistles. Just one more idea to have fun with.

Most songs are in D or G with an occasional A thrown in.

Songs:

Ash Grove
Bile 'em Cabbage Down
Cripple Creek
Flowers of Edinburgh
Ganglat Fran Mockfjard
I’se the B’y
Kesh Jig
La Valse des Jeunes Filles
Old Joe Clark
Rickett’s Hornpipe
Road to Boston
Si Bheag Si Mhor
St. Anne’s Reel
Swallowtail Jig
Swinging Fiddles
Westphalia Waltz

And you can also get it with a cd

Published by Alfred Publishing…www.alfredpub.com

ISBN 0-88284-802-X

good luck

Chris (L),
While you make some good points, I think that for many - if not most - people, that kind of thinking would totally ruin their enjoyment of the music. I certainly play with the intent of having fun, and I certainly think it’s the most important part of playing: but I don’t think that this is necessarilly a path to bad musicianship, or that becoming a decent musician can only be done by putting your nose to the grindstone and work, work, work. Or, more to the point, I don’t think one has to -think- of it that way. Yes, I think I have to spend time playing with a focus to my rhythm, to my tone, to playing in tune… yes, I think I have to get my cuts and taps snappier (since they’re my fundamental articulation) before I worry too much about my rolls, and yes, I’m dissatisfied with my level of proficiency on both whistle and flute.

But, I don’t feel a need to stop playing for fun to go ‘work’ on my playing before I can ‘really’ play. I play now as well as I can, and enjoy it for what it is… but I’m also not unrealistic about my level of playing… I’m good in comparison to other 1 year and less beginners, and nowhere near the level of most sessions, much less the recorded ‘greats’. On the other hand, I can still hear my own progress on an almost daily basis (of course, it’s the rare day that I don’t play for at least a couple of hours, more if I can!). It’s semantics, really… but -everything- on this board is semantics, since all we have is words… but, I think that playing to have fun and improving at your own rate is not any more or less likely to make someone a good player than working like the dickens to become good. And, while maybe I’ve not been around long enough to have my opinion count for much, I think that one of the great things about the Irish musical tradition is that it’s learned by playing, taught by playing, and all about playing. Scales are not part of the tradition except inasmuch as it’s an obvious way to first learn how to voice an instrument… there are no drills, no ‘methods’, no institutions of correctness (despite attempts in recent decades to create them); there is only the sound, and the only way to learn what the sound sounds like is to listen to it, and the only way to learn what the sound sounds like is to play it, which, as it happens, are wonderfully enjoyable activities both.

Classical music has been filled with drills and rules and ‘musts’ until the life has been driven from it (though some, obviously, can find the spark still or no-one would be drawn to it!), and jazz, while also very much a listen-and-play music has ascended to amazing heights of theory and complexity (though many of the historic greats were ‘intuitive’ players and some today still recognize that) and is in danger of going the way of classical.

Irish music is, ultimately, a folk tradition, played by people in their spare time, on what instruments they had to hand, for their own enjoyment and the enjoyment of their neighbors. It is all -about- having fun, and improvement should come -while- having fun. That’s what get-togethers like the one that launched this thread are about: playing together, having fun, and learning from each other and from the experience, all rolled up into one. That’s what kitchen-sessions, at least, are about, and I hope it’s what any session I eventually join is about.

Whew! Anyway; when you talk about needing to ‘work hard’ and ‘be serious’, it makes me want to run far, far away… and play my whistle all for myself as unseriously as possible. :wink: I think, going out on a limb here, that you feel exactly the same about people with my attitude… but, the real point that I’m trying to communicate here is that it’s not whether one is ‘working hard and serious’ or ‘playing and having fun’ that matters, it’s the desire to improve. If one -really- desires to improve, and really loves the instrument, then one is going to put in the hours necessary to become better.

And, I think, unless you’re obstinately refusing to try, it’s really hard to not learn something from every act of playing; if the people that started this thread end up playing one lead and one harmony, then they’ll learn something about harmony… which may help them if they take up, or play with players of, uillean pipes or guitar. Even if it doesn’t, it will improve their ear, and make it easier to play by ear a tune that they heard originally in a different key. Whether they play harmony or together, it will certainly teach something about blowing into tune (it’s pretty well necessary to play two whistles together!). So, just because people are trying to have fun, please don’t think that they’re not committed to the music, or not going to learn anything, or are not trying to improve.

Personally, I’m very committed to having as much fun as possible while playing as many tunes as I can get my hands on, and playing as best as I can, and I expect that one day I’ll be able to sit into sessions with reasonable confidence that I’m adding something to the music.

–Chris, a very ‘serious’ advocate of having fun. :wink:



PS: None of this is to say that you can just be a good musician by just wanting it, of course; I’m very frustrated by a friend of mine who could play the whistle without a squeak within minutes of picking it up, can pick up tunes at the drop of a hat… and never puts any time in except when around me or another player, so his rhythm is terrible, and he loses the tunes almost as fast as he learns them… It does take time in actually playing the music to learn to play the music, no matter how much ‘natural’ talent you start with!


[ This Message was edited by: ChrisA on 2002-07-01 22:25 ]

Hi again all,
Thanks for all the suggestions. Yes, I play in a band, and I know a few tunes; but this time I was just wanting to know how to play with a new friend I had gained thru this forum.
We decided to try ALL the suggestions and see what happens. If it sounds bad, we will move on to another suggestions, and YES, we WILL HAVE FUN in the trying.
Thanks all,
Lolly

On 2002-07-01 21:32, StevieJ wrote:

First, the person who asked the question is by no means new around here.

She was new enough to ask the question. The answer may have been obvious to you, but just as obviously it wasn’t to her. She deserved to have her question treated with respect.

Are you suggesting that if someone has sufficient tenure on the board we are no longer obligated to be nice to them?

Second, unless I’m missing something, no-one said that the question shouldn’t have been asked.

I was referring to the reception she got from a couple of “old timers” on the board who should have known better. Others of us had responded to her question in constructive ways when they chimed in, gratuitously, condescendingly, rather insufferably.
How is one to know what is acceptable to ask, and what not? Is it in the FAQ somewhere?

What harm does it do to be courteous?

On 2002-07-01 21:32, StevieJ wrote:

…Second, unless I’m missing something, no-one said that the question shouldn’t have been asked.

No, they were just told the subject in question was “ridiculous” by two vastly experienced players. Maybe that has a different definition in Ireland or Canada, but here it means “you are an idiot for asking such a stupid question.” Admittedly, Chris L made amends by posting an extremely educational and enjoyable post, but that doesn’t excuse you for making light of an insult to an honest question. After all I’ve learned from your website and previous posts, I just expected better from you, Stevie.

ChrisLaughlin wrote:
:roll:
This is rediculous. Have any of you listened to Gavin Whelan, Mary Bergin, Laurence Nugent, Sean Potts - any trad musicians? By THEMSELVES they sound amazing, and very interesting. Why not try and play as well as them before resorting to gimicks like playing in intervals and playing rounds? One of the best sessions I ever played in was just four low F whistles. We all played the same tunes. No rounds. No harmony. No gimmicks. Just four low whistles playing jigs and reels 'till the sunrise. It sounded rediculously good.
My 3.7 cents,
Chris

Rounds and harmony are not gimmicks.

On 2002-07-02 02:14, Walden wrote:
Rounds and harmony are not gimmicks.

Apparently, whether or not they are considered gimmicks depends on the genre. In Irish traditional, harmony is not prominent, but in the sessions I’ve attended, it is provided to some extent by the pipes, banjo, guitar, mandolin, and (with some stretch of the imagination) the bodhran.

Ridseard wrote:

Apparently, whether or not they are considered gimmicks depends on the genre. In Irish traditional, harmony is not prominent, but in the sessions I’ve attended, it is provided to some extent by the pipes, banjo, guitar, mandolin, and (with some stretch of the imagination) the bodhran.

That’s true enough. You could offend someone’s preconceived notions. But what’s called “traditional” today (as concerns instrumental practice) is not what was traditional 40 years ago. And if you play it well, it may be traditional 40 years in the future.

The whole atmosphere here is turning a bit sour again, one of these phases is arriving where a minor remark will cause heaps of defensive outbursts and flame threads. And the ultimate one that always comes out in these situation ‘but not all of us play Irish music you know’, as if that is the fault of those who do.
To be honest I am getting a bit cranky myself, first because very little sensible has been said in general on this board [there were some notable exceptions though]and few, if any, interesting subjects have been raised on the board in recent weeks. I wouldn’t have reacted to this whole thread at all if the two posters before me hadn’t said a couple of things I only had been thinking but had decided against airing.
Irritation has been building for a time, in a lot of people, over threads like ‘who considers himself a pro-player here’ as if it matters what you make with it money-wise, do you make good music is what is it about or is that a totally outrageous thought?. I remember one thread a long while ago where people were asked how good the really were some. One person immediately reacted ‘I am a total pro’. This person regularly post messages he has his latest tune recorded and personally I think he hasn’t a fecking clue. So why bring up these non-subjects every time. Go out and listen to nice music, some of the nicest music I get to hear is being played by people who are total strangers to the notion of professional musicianship[I only realised after posting this both threads were posted by same person, makes you wonder, that]. What matters is whether or not, as an old fiddleplayer here Michael Downes calls it, you ‘can carry over a tune’. Play it well and give it meaning so that it speaks to the listener.

Anyway, the reason I disqualified this thread as ridiculous in the first place is plain and simple[and I did so admittedly solely based on the subject line]. If you regard your instrument and your music as potentially boring, then you obviously have little regard for either. If you think your music is ‘boring’ you can hardly expect people listening to it to think otherwise. What can you say to that, well what I said, better go out and learn to play your music well, it won’t be ‘boring’ then.
Chris eloquently elaborated on that. Realise you are are crap player, go out and listen to those who aren’t work on it and keep doing so until things improve. It’s the only way. And it is also something I have been emphasising for the past year. Regarding myself I have said time and time again I think I am a crap whistleplayer, I have taken some inspiration though from this board and have worked on it and I am less crap on the whistle than I was a year ago. But it’s work, rewarding and satisfying and fun as it may be but you don’t pick it up off the stones.

Sorry, I suppose that needed venting, let’s not dwell on it and move on. At some point the sun will come out again and all will be well again.

I add a few bits, as to Walden’s I am not fully convinced the music has changed all that much in 40 years, I play a good bit with older players [you have to cherish them I think and learn whatever they have to give while they are still here], in fact one of my more regular partners in music is a fierce old lady well into her seventies. A great concertina player who has been out of playing for 45 years and has gone back into it with a vengeance. Her music is very much as it was some 50 years ago. And it is not all that different from today’s. Change, some yes, big change, no, not really as evolution is a slow process. Fashions come and go and only small bits worthy of the music are retained. And in the context of this music rounds and harmony ARE gimmicks.





[ This Message was edited by: Peter Laban on 2002-07-02 09:52 ]

Hi Lolly,

Good to hear you’ve got someone to play whistle with without a session - panic attacks can wait a while! Im hoping soon to be playing whistle/flute duets, sharing the music is so much better than playing alone.

If you have any whistle tutorial CDs, you would have the same problem - play EXACTLY what is on the CD, and you can barely tell there are two whistles. Of course, you rarely play exactly the same, you’d have to be Dr. Memorex or Captain Xerox or something to do that.

Two whistles playing together will push and pull against the rhythm & melody of the tune, just as a singer weaves a song in and out of the backing accompaniment. As our more experienced colleagues have said, but not in these words, the beauty of the music shines through the gaps between the variations. Listen to any recording of two of the same instrument playing together (fiddles, flutes, whistles, whatever) and you’ll hear how they rarely pursue the exact same melody to get from A to B. One of my favourite recordings is St Anne’s Reel played by 3 fiddles at once (On Bringing it all back Home)- the weaving in and out of three fiddlers around the theme is something close to heaven, and always brings a smile to my face.

So I would fall into suggesting you both play the same tune on the same key whistle but don’t strive to play the tune the same. Know the tunes you are playing inside out, don’t play from sheet music, and you free yourself up to discovering your own variations that make the tune your own, not just a copy of something you’ve seen or heard.

On 2002-07-02 04:28, Peter Laban wrote:
The whole atmosphere here is turning a bit sour again, one of these phases is arriving where a minor remark will cause heaps of defensive outbursts and flame threads.

Sorry, I suppose that needed venting, let’s not dwell on it and move on. At some point the sun will come out again and all will be well again.

Good points…well said.

To Blackhawk and Neil (with apologies to everyone else):

Blackhawk:

I’m trying to understand how your expectations of me can have been disappointed. The only answer I can find is that you assume I think the original poster is “an idiot” for asking the question. If so, that is an enormous assumption and totally unwarranted. Please read my comments again.

Also, you have to realize that Neil is a very punctilious man. Several times in the past he has picked apart my posts phrase by phrase by phrase. So, in my previous reply, I thought I would give him a taste of his own medicine - without any added rancour. (Daft idea, probably.)

I was attempting - without offering any comment on the discussion at issue - to show him that his questions were predicated on false premisses.

Neil:

On 2002-07-02 00:57, ndjr wrote:
Are you suggesting that if someone has sufficient tenure on the board we are no longer obligated to be nice to them?

No. What gave you that idea? I was merely pointing out that your question was beside the point.

I was referring to the reception she got from a couple of “old timers” on the board who should have known better. Others of us had responded to her question in constructive ways when they chimed in, gratuitously, condescendingly, rather insufferably.

Yes I realize that. (Do credit me with a little intelligence.) Again, I was merely commenting on the way you phrased your question, which was tantamount to putting words into people’s mouths.

How is one to know what is acceptable to ask, and what not? Is it in the FAQ somewhere?

I would have said that all questions are acceptable, as are all answers. Knowing your views on the importance of not silencing people, I would have imagined you would agree.

What harm does it do to be courteous?

It does no harm to be courteous, of course. That’s a choice we can all make. I try. But tell me, would you silence those who fail to meet your criteria of courtesy? :wink:

On 2002-07-01 23:01, lollycross wrote:
Hi again all,
Thanks for all the suggestions. Yes, I play in a band, and I know a few tunes; but this time I was just wanting to know how to play with a new friend I had gained thru this forum.
We decided to try ALL the suggestions and see what happens. If it sounds bad, we will move on to another suggestions, and YES, we WILL HAVE FUN in the trying.
Thanks all,
Lolly

Good for you! :wink:

And I’m sorry that your thread got hijacked to side debates (to which I contributed somewhat…)… but at least your question got answered, in spades. :wink:

–Chris

On 2002-07-02 04:28, Peter Laban wrote:
Anyway, the reason I disqualified this thread as ridiculous in the first place is plain and simple [and I did so admittedly solely based on the subject line]. If you regard your instrument and your music as potentially boring, then you obviously have little regard for either. If you think your music is ‘boring’ you can hardly expect people listening to it to think otherwise. What can you say to that, well what I said, better go out and learn to play your music well, it won’t be ‘boring’ then.

Where did the original poster every say anything remotely close about “boring”??? She just said that she wanted to know how she and a friend could best play their whistles together.

I found it a very reasonable question, one that hadn’t even occurred to me, and the helpful replies were great ideas and suggestions that I’m going to try the next time I get together with my sister. Thanks, Lolly, for asking a good question, and thanks everyone else who replied with good ideas.