Book Review: 101 Myths of the Bible

Biblical archaeologist confirms what I’ve suspected all along. I just bought
this book and the few chapters I’ve read so far are very interesting.

How Ancient Scribes Invented Biblical History

Author: Gary Greenberg, President of the Biblical Archaeology Society of NY.

(about the book) http://members.tripod.com/ggreenberg/101myths-book.htm
101 Myths of the Bible examines many of the most famous stories in the Old Testament and shows the various influences that led to the writing. Among the subjects explored are the earlier versions of many biblical stories that were told among Israel’s neighbors, the strong Egyptian influences on many of the biblical accounts, and the internal political and religious feuds in ancient Israel that led to various propagandistic versions of earlier history. Among the many revelations in the book, we learn that:

1.Moses didn’t write the Ten Commandment
2.David didn’t kill Goliath
3.Samson did not pull down a Philistine temple
4.Joshua didn’t bring down the walls of Jericho
5.Sodom and Gommorah never existed
6.Noah’s ark did not land on Mount Ararat
7.The story of Esther originally had nothing to do with the Jews of Persia.

101 Myths of the Bible has been published in hardcover and paperback editions. It has also been published in Spanish by Oceano/Ambar and in Korean. A Greek edition is due before mid-2003. For several days in September 2002, 101 Myths of the Bible ranked among the 150 bestselling books at Amazon. In February 2002 Barnes and Noble ranked it at #15 out of over 2300 books on General Criticism and Interpretation of the Bible.


(book reviews) http://ggreenberg.tripod.com/ancientne/101rev.html

Why beat a dead horse?

necrophiliac beastiality

interesting

boring

okay

This is an inflamitory subject for those of christian faith. I hope we can be adults and discuss this calmly(?).

I believe that there is an omipotent just Creator, but I also believe that most of the written Qur’an/Judeo-Christian Bible is fictional. These books have been edited so many times that 7 of the books(the Bible is a compilation) have been removed for contradictions. This inter-doctrine confusion is the singlemost reason for warfare in the world. Both sides scream “God is with us!” before they butcher each other.

King James edited a word in the passage “Thou shalt not suffer a Poisoner to live”. Poisoner was replaced with Witch, and 20 million women,men and children were publicly tortured,dismembered and burned alive by the Catholic church. That’s double the burnings Hitler is responsible for.

God’s grace is a miracle, but organized religeon is the greatest plague mankind has ever known. Every missionary group that has come in contact with a native people has either destroyed them, enslaved them or remolded them into subserviant shadows of what they were before their “salvation”. Good intentions? Yes, but wrong none the less.

Genesis says “As soon as 2 stones are placed one upon the other, the ground shall not be hallowed”. I guess that makes all those marble walled, golden altered palaces they call “churches” as unholy ground, yes? After all, it says so in the Bible.

This is my opinion of course, and can be ignored if you disagree. I mean no insult and I support all “peaceful” religeons, but like American politics, it is our leaders who are corrupt.

The old testament, if you ask me, is mostly allegory anyhow. It’s not meant to be taken in a word-for-word literal fashion. It’s there to teach a manner of living and viewing life and the world, not history. You’re missing the point entirely if you just pick at facts and split hairs.

ditto

Do you refer to the universal body of believers, or to the Roman communion, specifically? The King James Bible is not, nor was it, used by the Roman Church.

Speaking of inflammatory, I’m reading Nietzsche’s “The Anti-Christ”
Very interesting stuff.

Quote from The Anti-Christ:

“He (Christ) died for his own sins- there is not the slightest ground for believing, no matter how often it is asserted, that he died for the sins of others.”

Has anyone here read this book?
I’d be interested in hearing what others that have read it think about it, as I really don’t know much about Christianity.

Bible question - are there any languages that it hasn’t been translated into?

edited to change the word tit to it

Tee shirt I saw:

“God is dead - Nietzsche”

“Nietzsche is dead. - God.”



nuff said
serpent

(edited to add the “s” to “Nietzsche”. De Devil made me do dat!" :smiley:

Yes.

There are many… here are some statistics: http://www.wycliffe.org/language/statistics.htm

Erik

Now that’s a mustache. Good job, Fred.

I read some of the works of another notable non-believer.

“For England must not fall: it would mean an inundation of Russian and German political degradations which would envelop the globe and steep it in a sort of Middle-Age night and slavery which would last till Christ comes again–which I hope he will not do; he made trouble enough before.”

– Samuel Langhorne “Mark Twain” Clemens

I’ve read a lot of books about him, but they never explain how he managed to find his mouth when eating.

Let’s make someone else’s religious beliefs out to look stupid and try to start an argument, why don’t we. My aren’t we thoughtful!

Here’s part of a review of the book. Elsewhere it says that
Mr. Greenberg, a lawyer, ran for governor of NY
in 1978 on the libertarian ticket. Apparently he has
been dismissed as a ‘crackpot’ in the New York Times
Book Review on account of his earlier book,
The Moses Mystery. On the other hand he went to
Brooklyn College, my alma mater. People
like that don’t make mistakes! Sounds like
an interesting book.

New York Press (12/27/00, Vol. 13, No. 52)

The Egyptian Bible
by John Strasbaugh

In his day job, Gary Greenberg is a senior trial lawyer for the Criminal Defense Division of the Legal Aid Society here in the city. He sometimes appears as a commentator on Court TV.

But it’s his avocation that brings him to our attention. Some guys race birds, some guys build model trains, some guys coach championship Little League baseball teams.

Greenberg is an avocational biblical scholar. And a controversial one.

In his 1997 The Moses Mystery: The African Origins of the Jewish People (reprinted in paperback as The Bible Myth), Greenberg argued that there was no archaeological or documentary evidence for most of the stories the Old Testament tells about the origins of the Jews-no Abraham living in “Ur of the Chaldees,” no 400 years of enslavement in Egypt, no Exodus and wandering 40 years in the desert. Instead, he believes the Hebrews originally were Egyptians, devotees of Akhenaten’s monotheism-Moses was his high priest-who had to flee after Akhenaten died and Horemheb violently rejected the new religion.

These were not brand-new notions. Egyptian roots for the biblical Hebrews were theorized back in the 19th century. Afrocentric spins on the origins of Western Civ were a nickel a bushel in the 1990s. And archaeologists have long pointed out that there’s no physical record of many cities and places named in the Bible, while existing remains often conflict with biblical dating schemes. (Last year, Tel Aviv University archaeologist Ze’ev Herzog stirred up a maelstrom of denunciation in Israel arguing this last point in the tony Ha’aretz. The problem in Israel with this kind of talk is that if the Bible is bunk, then the legitimacy of the state’s claim on the lands it occupies is diminished.)

Familiarity did not stop Greenberg’s critics. A brief yet haughty pan in The New York Times effectively wrote him off as a crackpot. The reviewer “went ballistic,” Greenberg grins today. Academic Egyptologists and biblical scholars, who get tetchy when outsiders blur the distinctions between their two discrete fields, weren’t pleased with him either.

Undaunted, Greenberg argues in his new book, 101 Myths of the Bible (Sourcebooks, 319 pages, $24.95), that the Hebrews’ Egyptian roots left numerous literary traces in the Old Testament, in the form of ancient Egyptian myths variously disguised, warped by 1000 years of handling, or ineptly edited by the Bible’s redactors. The result, he says, is that much of what you read in the Old Testament (“I’m not into the New Testament,” he says) is bull, from the two different versions of Creation in Genesis to the fictional Patriarchs to nonexistent places like Sodom and Gomorrah.

Greenberg comes to his study of mythology and folklore the old-fashioned American way: DIY.

“I’ve always been interested in the intersections between myth and history,” he says. “There’s a lot of myth that contains history. There’s a lot of history that’s mostly myth. I started as a kid-my father gave me the Greek myths, and I sorta got it, but it was just reading the stories. As I got older I started reading other stuff. I was starting to do some independent study, and it resulted in looking at some early parts of the Bible. I wanted to look at the Flood myth.”

So he took some classes?

“No, I was a math major. Brooklyn College… Got interested in these subjects and started drafting manuscripts in these subjects. I did a little networking, started going to academic conferences.”

Greenberg is the current president of the Biblical Archaeology Society of New York, a group that meets at the Taipei Noodle House on 2nd Ave. near 52nd St. roughly monthly to hear lectures like “Egypt in the Late Period: Gold Treasures from Tanis” and “An Amorite Caravan in Egypt: An Evaluation.” Would that I had the time.