I expect this to be controversial, but I can live with that. This is not about recent threads but about threads that have started on this board and the previous two. Recently, John McHaffie has been the subject of intense scrutiny. Michael Burke has been the subject of scrutiny, so had Mike Copeland & Jim Rementer. Two boards ago, it was Ralph Cook getting what John is getting now. Ralph Cook has skipped town and dropped off the face of the earth as far as the whistle community is concerned. I think that is our loss, not his. Scrutiny is pretty much a constant. I will try to be non specific from hear on out, I just wanted to point out that members of this forum have had concerns and have voiced them. This forum is certainly a proper place to voice these concerns. I just have another point of view and I feel that this forum is the proper place to voice this opinion with the intent of rational discussion. My words will flow like stench from a privy, but please remember, I am focusing on a general pattern, not a specific event, post, or member. Please take all of my words with that grain of salt, and hopefully a few others.
We like whistles. We all like playing them. Some of us like collecting them. Some like cheap, mass-produced whistles. Some of us like expensive, hand crafted whistles. Some of us like all whistles. I have had a chance to talk with and visit with a few of the whistlesmiths, the makers of hand-crafted whistles. For the most part, these whistlesmiths all have DAY JOBS. They spend a small amount of time each day making whistles after coming home because they enjoy it. Some have machine shops at home; some have dedicated machine shops in rented location. Some of these machines cost as much as a hundreds of whistles. In a few hours a day, how fast can a whistlesmith make up this money. Something tells me a long time.
I feel as if I have been whistling for a short time (since 1998). I have. The number of whistle smiths has exploded. There is a community of 2600 something whistlers subscribing to Dale’s letters. Probably less than 400 members are on this board. About 60 are regular contributors. Certainly, there are untold thousands outside this community that play whistles. But, are there enough to keep all of these makers in business?
These makers must have had some fascination with the whistle to get started in this line of work that is lucrative by no means (for example, Mike Copeland does not drive a Lexus and live on Boat House Row with a fortune he made off of Loren’s back). Their thoughts must have been “this is cool,” “this is fun,” “I can make this better,” or “I’d like to do something different.” There must have been a voice of an engineer or an artist or an inventor speaking to them. A creative voice coupled with music has got to be a powerful one.
Coming from this perspective, every whistlesmith is not well equipped to run a business. Production estimates are bases on intuition, which is biased by good intentions which are not always in harmony with a broken or stolen machine, a sick son or daughter, a prolonged illness, or even a death in the family. . . You get the picture.
Now I expect great prompt service from places like Amazon.com or some other place with thousands of employees. When one has a personal problem, there are nine hundred and ninety-nine others to pick up the slack. These gentlemen (I use that term as no woman has yet stepped up to challenge the old boys system among the whistlesmiths) are probably sole proprietors with, at most, a single helper (with a DAY JOB). Each day of lost production by him is a complete day lost by the WHOLE company.
I am not saying that ignoring contacts is appropriate. I am not saying that prompt refunds are not deserved when they are in order. I am not saying that poor business management is to be applauded. I am saying that we play folk instruments. We do not offer a major economic sector that Alan Greenspan considers when changing the prime rate (yes, I know, a re-tread of Dale’s long standing joke). I am saying that sometimes folks may make honest bad decisions along somewhere along the line when trying to provide you a whistle. With persistent negative feed back is applied early, it may provide enough stress to turn a minor production problem into a reason to close the shop for good. In the cases of late, however, involving no refunds, bad production estimate upon bad production estimate, and absence of contact; negative feedback is certainly in order. In these situations there may be only three ways out.
(1)Brazil (although there is at least one of us there)
(2)Bankruptcy
(3)Honesty
I know there are holes throughout the ideas that I’ve written, but I’ve wanted to say this for weeks; so here it is. I genuinely expect a flame or two about this, but I guess it is deserved. It is a public forum . . .
Best wishes with no bad intentions,
Honest.
Mark Johnston.
[ This Message was edited by: DaleWisely on 2001-08-26 12:22 ]