Wombat - thanks. That does clear some things up. If anyone has played both, it would be nice to know what they thought, as far as differences.
TerryB - I’ll answer here - I don’t mind. From what I’ve gathered, one can enjoy the Irish flute from the beginning. In the reviews of the Casey Burns folk flute, it was repeatedly mentioned that it sounded beautiful really from the beginning. With the cello . . . well, it can be a different story. I’m not entirely sure how to answer this, because it can go both ways. If you practice a little bit each day, buy a cheap cello, try to learn on your own, well . . . it’s going to be awful. In most cases. There’s no such thing as a “nice, cheap beginners cello.” It takes masters of the instrument to make those things sound presentable. However, if you’re willing to invest $3000 (
) and a long time searching for the right cello, and then put serious hard work in for the first year or two, well, now we’re talking. Of course, different people would have different opinions. I switched from violin at a young age, and it probably took me three or four years and several thousand dollars to reach a level were I felt comfortable performing at, say, church. Is it worth it? Oh, definitely. The Irish flute seems to be more of a melodic, solo instrument - from there is the real joy attained. But the cello has the perks of a string quartet or a full orchestra. Where you have the power to express in a group. I play solo, quartet, and full orchestra, and right now, full orchestra’s my favorite.
Sorry - you start me talking about cello, and you have to manually stop me. Too many tangents.
You have the perk of being “middle-aged.” I think a lot of time is wasted on young musicians. Not that they don’t learn or shouldn’t start young, but there are so many impediments like the required coordination and “slower” minds. They develop bad habbits that are hard to fix. Of course, adults are just as capable of that, but they also have the mental capacity to keep more things in mind at one time. Starting young has its definite perks, but it’s just as good to “start old,” in my opinion. The next person will tell you the opposite, I’m sure.
Anyway, is it worth it? I’d say of course. Invest the money, take the lessons, practice hard. Everyone who hears you well tell you, “You know, I’ve always loved the sound of a cello . . .” and that is worth everything. And the fact that some of the most gorgeous music in the world was written for the cello . . .
I don’t feel like I’m being coherent here, and that’s because each individual has a different response to the cello. Some people take to it naturally, and acheive real proficiency easily. Others are never able to play a stringed instrument. It’s a challenge, but one well worth it. Anyway, if you have specific questions, that would help me clarify everything.