A secular story for Christmas

In 1943 a young Polish woman, about 20,
was walking past the Warsaw ghetto when
she saw a young Jewish woman, the same
age, who had crawled through the barbed
wire. The Jewish girl was lying
on the sidewalk, too exhausted and
famished to move.

The Polish girl gathered up the Jewish
girl, took her home (where she
lived with her mother) and hid her. The
penalty for doing such a thing was death;
indeed, hundreds of such Poles were shot.
Also anti-Semitism in Poland was so
widespread that your neighbours, if they
suspected you of hiding Jews, would likely
inform the Nazis. After the war, elements
of the Polish resistance, which had
fought the Nazis, went about murdering
Poles who had helped Jews.

After a month the neighbours became
suspicious. ‘You must go,’ the Polish
girl told the Jewish girl, ‘or else
we will all be shot. But I’ll go with you.’
So for the next two years the Polish
girl and the Jewish girl hid in the
forest, slept in haystacks, appearing
at people’s doors at dusk to beg for
food.

One night as they were lying in
a haystack, the Jewish girl asked the
Polish girl: ‘What do you think of
Jews?’ ‘Jews are terrible people!’
the Polish girl answered vehemently.
‘They cut the throats of gentile
children to use their blood in the
Passover matza. They’re all rich.
They contol everything…’ She was,
you see, a virulent anti-Semite,
who hated Jews.

The Jewish girl burst into tears.
‘You’re not like that, of course!’
the Polish girl said. ‘How do you
expect me to believe anything else?
It’s what I’ve heard all my life.’

The people who rescued Jews in
Poland during the Holocaust
seem to have been of two sorts.
First there were religious Christians,
who did what they were convinced
Jesus would do. They did not
see themselves as heroic. Second,
there were people who acted not so much for
religious reasons, but out of sheer
compassion. A fair number of them
hated Jews; nor did their hiding Jews in
the attic change this. After the war
they continued to be anti-Semites.
When asked why they had risked their
lives to help people they so despised, they
often answered simply: ‘They were helpless. We couldn’t let them be murdered.’

This story fascinates me.
Racists and bigots, like the
Polish girl, are sometimes people
of extraordinary compassion and
kindness! She did what most people with the right views would not have done.
She had a good heart, we might say.
I’m not much of a humanist, because
I find it hard to get revved up about
humanity. At the same time,
if ‘awful’ people can act so well,
and for the best of reasons, one
can’t give up hope in a better world,
can one?

It has always seemed to
me that the single most
important human accomplishment was
to become someone who would do what these
people did. This largely explains my
respect for Christianity. Something
must be right about a religion that
leads people to do what these
Polish Christians did. But if I
may put religion aside for the
moment, a star of hope continues to twinkle inextinguishably in the human heart.
Best to all, Jim

Charles Chaplin never answered the question which was asked to him more and more often in the 40’s, especially after The Dictator. He just never answered directly to the question : “Are you Jewish?”
He answered obliquely–if he did–like “I may be, or maybe not”. He never made it clear.

Today, it’s mostly understood like this : he didn’t want to answer a question he considered as totally irrelevant. Just like he did not state himself as American, or British, for that matter.

When I learnt this little story, I felt less alone. it reminded how I broke up my first serious relationship with a young lady. She, by education, was antisemitic without knowing what exactly it meant, or even knowing what makes someone Jew or not. She was just brought up like this by her family. This shocked me, so I never answered directly her direct question. Like, “well, you sure should know at least if I’m not..”
I would have felt ashamed to admit I’m gentile in order to save… To save what ? The question was just so irrelevant.
When she told she’d like a baby (normal thing) AND call it “Wolfgang” *, it made it : I panicked and ran for safety… :laughing: Good thing she didn’t suggest “Adolf”, I don’t know exactly how I would have reacted. A stroke at 20 is rare, though…

  • More than odd–weird–in 1975 France. Even Mozart idolatric worshippers would not consider anything else than Amadeus…

Jim, I hate to touch such a hot-button issue, but I think I can shed a little light on your young lady’s motivation. I had a friend for several years who would generally be called a racist (he wouldn’t deny it himself). He wasn’t violent, didn’t encourage ill-will or anything, he just had some very strong preconceptions that he wasn’t afraid to voice. However, he had some black friends. When I asked him about this, he said, “I like the individuals, I just have no use for the race.”

I’m not excusing these views, just pointing out that, just as with just about everything else, prejudice comes in different types and degrees.

PS – lovely story.


Charlie

“There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats.” – Albert Schweitzer

[ This Message was edited by: chas on 2002-12-24 10:16 ]

what is wrong with the name Wolfgang? My hubby’s middle name is Wolfgang and his fathers name was Wolfgang Seigfried and he was an observent Jew..my dh’s father was also an orphan and this name was given to him by the orphanage in Germany(his parents parished in the holocoust)..Anyway I dont know if this really relates to anything you guys are talking about really..

C4–nothing wrong at all with Wolfie (now this reminds me of some Tex Avery’s wolf :slight_smile: I just love ). I was quoting it as odd in a different context, different country, is all. Also, from a person who claimed herself as antisemitic (she didn’t see herself as a racist for that matter…) and had a strange vision of our middle-century history.
For instance, I like the Ukrainian first name Tarass (Bulba, Chevtchenko…). Now this could not be conceivable as a name in the French context. Less I’d like the kid to have a hell of a time in school: the pun “putain de Tarass” would be guaranteed to come by, and to stick for long as a sick nickname.

PS : would you call a kid Saddam ?

I suppose I would never name a kid Saddum in this day, poor thing wouldnt last a day in school..but Wolfgang is as commen in Germany as John or David is here in the States..

I’ve often noticed how in movies
and so on, people with the wrong views
are ugly or weird–they twitch or
have other unattractive features.
They’re obviously mean.
You never see good looking, warm,
kindly bigots in movies.

This has two dangers, at least.
First, one might say to oneself,
‘Well, I don’t twitch, I’m kindly,
I’m not mean to animals and children,
so my moral views
aren’t tragically mistaken.’ Big
mistake. Nobody is safe. Every
horrible view in history has been
held by some kindly, warm, attractive
people.

Second, we may not appreciate
the virtues of bad people, like
the Polish girl, who, despite being
a virulent bigot was also one of
the most compassionate people on earth!

Having the right views and having
a good heart are different–the Polish
girl had the latter without the former;
I know plenty of people who have the
former without the latter. How one
deals with humanity in principle
and how one deals with individuals
can be starkly different. Us human
critters really are a piece of work!
Mother Theresa said that what matters
most is how one deals with people,
person to person.


[ This Message was edited by: jim stone on 2002-12-24 15:48 ]