Basically, this has to do with more secure e-mail, and in this case it applies to the e-mail system known as Gmail. If you have Gmail, then this update is for you.
Beyond that, however, I’d suggest reading the WIRED article, as above, anyway, as the security mentioned really applies to all e-mail systems.
That is, Gmail now has a great security feature which may not be available on other e-mail systems.
The news gets better, as Gmail is available for free as a download.
If Gmail wasn’t sending yer login & password, unsecured, every time ya sent something to it in the 1st place then this “great security feature which may not be available on other e-mail systems” wouldn’t be needed.
It’s only a side benefit that sniffers will no longer be able to read yer mail.
Yes, but, at least Gmail now offers it, and otherwise a sniffer perhaps could access the whole of an e-mail account, including whatever personal information could be there, including mine, his, and theirs, or of whomever.
Furthermore, perhaps not all e-mail systems currently have such security.
Granted, the argument goes that Google deliberately didn’t include SSL security in the original Gmail versions, for such encryption would necessarily have slowed the service, and apparently Google chose to not hinder the convenience of their Gmail clients. However, apparently security has become enough of an issue that Google now chooses to include SSL, but that’s a good thing.
For a number of reasons, I like Gmail, and I doubt that the average Gmail user will notice any slowing due to the new SSL security.
yer not likely to notice the secure socket layer lag…
point is if they’re gonna send login & passwords back and forth they should have encrypted them.
More likely the designer didn’t realize that they would need the information for each interaction because the original idea was to use a persistent system. They changed their method and added the id & password and then forgot to go back and encrypt it later once they got the sucker working.
If you have ever used a web based system that would require you to log back in after a period of inactivity then you have witnessed the persistent method of keeping track of who wants what.
I’ve got two accounts that I use.
One of them moves the spam to a folder on their server so that if I log on to their system to check my mail I can paw through the suckers.
Usually I just pick up both accounts from here with my email client.