Ok, be gentle with my ignorance ![]()
The kind of timbre that first attracted me to Uilleann pipes was, if I can poorly describe, a kind of mettalic tone and more mellow. I don’t know exactly how to describe this preference, but it’s the kind of tone like in Mick O’Brien playing, especially in the Cd The Ancient Voice of Ireland. Some people could say that I’m just another fool intoxicated by the “new agey” style of players like Spillane and some recordings of John McSherry , but I also like traditional players and a similar kind of metallic tone (sorry again for the poor miserable description) in “non-new agey” players like Paddy Keenan.
So, what do I want to know - despite the fact that I’m just a crappy beginner, the tone basically and primarily depends on the chanter and the reed, is that right(suppose it’s a good player, so let’s not talk about the necessary ability and experience)?
I have a Peter Hunter chanter and a reed by Allan Burton so it’s supposed to be an excellent combination and it is, as said by many experienced players who tried the chanter. Since my poor initial level is no parameter to measure anything about tone, let me say that I also didn’t like much the tone of it when these excellent experienced players tried the chanter. I mean, it’s not that same “magical” tone that captivated me. The present tone of it is closer (and I found this kind of tone to be pretty common in many recordings, which I’m not much fond) to , how can I say, a wooden sax(especially in the first octave and bottom D, when not played hard), grossly speaking.
Sorry for the ridiculous comparison, these are all subjective sensations, but I’d just like to know if a different reed could approximate that kind of sound or should I look for another kind of chanter that might be closer to my cup of tea? ![]()









