Yes.
Discuss.
That’s a definite maybe.
Does this one?
Slan,
D.
I think my former marriage took place in an alternative universe… 
Y’know, the one where Spock had a beard and Kirk wore too much eye makeup…
'Course they exist!
Here’s proof!
more proof!
And again!
“Smoke me a kipper..”
Can there really be any real doubt?
Incontrovertable truth, Tyler.
You know, that beard lends him such poise, such elegance…
…I’d vote for him!
Denny, if that picture is from one of your astronomical telescopes…
where was it pointed?
Only if he’s running for emperor or king or something, no more of this “president” bullshite! 
Where the Sun (ours anyways ) doesn’t shine!
Yes. The Cosmos of the Bloodthirsty Squirrels.
Here ya go Dale! I thought of you when I found this one…hope it brings warm feelings to your heart!
What would constitute another universe? Would the existence of other universes mean that the universe was not all-encompassing? What is the boundary line? What makes other universes so other?
mmmmmmmmmmm… kippers…
I think I agree with that.
What constitutes any universe?
Look at the Mandelbrot. A theoretically infinite mathmatical universe. How about some of the vast online virtual worlds. I consider them micro-universes.
Then there’s the universe we create in our minds daily. For example the voices in my head come from a beautiful universe where everything is MINE. And everyone is MY MINION. MUUAAAHAAHAAAH.
…sorry. got carried away.
Just make sure the sky isn’t green in your world. It makes it near impossible to tell when to stop mowing.
I remember YEARS ago, reading a sci-fi story about a “universe” that was contained in a water drop. I think it was called “Surface Tension”.
Well, when I read things such as
According to Max Tegmark, the existence of other universes is a direct implication of cosmological observations. In an article entitled “Parallel Universes” in the May 2003 issue of Scientific American, he presents a clear and comprehensive picture of the idea of parallel universes. Tegmark describes the set of related concepts which share the notion that there are universes beyond the familiar observable one. He goes on to provide a taxonomy of parallel universes organized by levels.(1)
Level I: (Open multiverse) A generic prediction of cosmic inflation is an infinite ergodic universe, which contains Hubble volumes realizing all initial conditions - including an identical copy of you about meters away.
Level II: (Andre Linde’s bubble theory) In chaotic inflation, other thermalized regions may have different effective physical constants, dimensionality and particle content. Surprisingly this level includes Wheeler’s oscillating universe theory as well.
Level III: (Hugh Everett III’s many-worlds interpretation) An interpretation of quantum mechanics that proposes the existence of multiple universes, all of which are identical, but exist in possibly different states. It is widely believed that Everett’s interpretation considered as a formal theory is a conservative extension of standard quantum mechanics, that is, as far as results expressible in the language of ordinary quantum mechanics is concerned, it leads to no new results. According to Tegmark “This is ironic given that this level has historically been the most controversial”.
Level IV: (The ultimate “Ensemble theory” of Tegmark) Other mathematical structures give different fundamental equations of physics. M-theory would be placed here. Since this subsumes all other ensembles, it therefore brings closure to the hierarchy of multiverses: there cannot be a Level V .
…it’s honestly flies over my head; however, Walden’s thoughts are easier for me to understand…
You mean like http://shipoffools.com ?