On 2002-08-16 17:34, MacEachain wrote:
I’m not having much luck in that respect, I was trying to get in touch with Phil Hardy but he’s on vacation at the moment. You might consider that lucky though!!
Cheers, Mac
LOL!!! Yeah, you got that right!!
As far as the flutes are concerned: I owned a Copley (hated to give it up, but I had to sacrifice for the Olwell), and I’ve played a Hamilton. I found the Copley much easier to lip and easier to fill - in fact it was the easiest flute I’ve ever played, and with excellent volume as well.
I think for someone without a really strong embouchure, the Copley would be very difficult to beat: It sounds great, is very easy to play, has a good flexibility of tone, is competitively priced, and is very well made.
Hammy’s flutes are louder and capable of an even more agressive tone, but you’ve got to have a better embouchure to get the best out them, and they certainly require more wind to really keep 'em going. Hammy’s flutes are very handsome - particularly masculine looking flutes if you ask me, and I count that as a good thing.
Both flutes are well balanced, however personally I prefer the two-piece Rudall Style body section on the Copley, rather than the single Pratten style body section that is Hammy’s standard. I just find it’s way more comfortable to be able to rotate the top and bottom sections in different directions, but then I have some shoulder problems, so that factors in for me.
Honestly, I’d consider the climate a where you live and where the maker lives. I hate to say it, but I’ve experienced problems with wooden whistles that were manufactured in a climate with significantly higher humidity than I have. I’ve heard similar things from flute owners, so at the very least, I’d check with the maker and find out what RH he seasons his wood to, and at least consider that in your decision.
Good luck!
Loren