I’m interested in purchasing a flute that has been offered to me. It is made by Patrick Olwell and it is based on the ‘nicholson’ model - I am not familiar with this . How does it compare to a Prattan or a Rudell? Thanks for any replies,
I think I recall seeing a piece of paper from Patrick Olwell describing the Nicholson as sort of “in between” a Pratten and a Rudall. My Olwell Pratten had bigger toneholes and a big old honking sound. It could take a lot of air, though it didn’t need it. My present Olwell Nicholson has markedly smaller toneholes which are actually spaced a little closer together (particularly on the right hand, where they’re a bit more “upstream” from the foot end). Like Jon said, I don’t know if the bore profile is any different, ALTHOUGH I have gotten my cleaning swab stuck in the Nicholson foot with more regularity which makes me wonder if there’s a more dramatic taper from head to foot.
It prefers much less air than the Pratten will take, and lets you know if you’re overfilling it by kind of going a little “dead.” However, a nice light airstream and not too much lip pressure and the thing just sings in a surprisingly big loud voice. A phenomenal flute, really – suits me better than the Pratten overall, I think. If you can get a fair price on it you’ll probably be very happy with it. Mine’s a terrific all-around flute.
I’ve not played one of Patrick’s Rudalls but the Murray I have is, I’m told, a variant of a Rudall and has a smaller, more slender bore, and (oddly!) bigger toneholes, particularly on the right hand, than the Olwell Nicholson.
Yes, unless the price is crazy, it will be a great flute.
The headjoint fits the Pratten body, and so you can get a Pratten
body too, if ever you really want one.
I have an Olwell Pratten and an Olwell Nicholson, both are superb. The Pratten is slightly more powerful, but you get a focused tone out of the Nicholson like you wouldn’t believe. You can’t go wrong there…
I’ve had several players trying to swipe that Nicholson from me…