There was no other purpose for my posting this than to share something that I read and thought was well written and very clearly expressed a fundamental truth.
Not everyone has acheived cynical enlightenment yet. Many people practice
Buddhism for years without coming to terms with what James quoted. Hell,
the entirety of Covey’s 7 Habits of Highly Blah, Blah, Blah is painfully obvious,
but despite that, the sucker was a NYTimes bestseller.
That looks like an interesting book, James. I might have to read that.
I saw an article the other day (I think it was in PopSci) about a
Theoretical Physicist who was annoyed that scientists have latched
onto String Theory so hard, despite recent evidence that it might be
very wrong. He was not trying to get anyone to abandon the theory,
rather he wanted people to start exploring other Unification Theories
and putting some grant money into non-Stringy experiments, but he
kept running into this zealotry from the String Theorists, which
surprised him. Science is supposed to be more open minded than
that, he thought. I’m sure the same thing happens in Biology,
Linguistics (Chomskyism seems like a cult sometimes), and definitely
Archeology (think about the scene in Stargate where the scientist gets
laughed off the stage for daring to disagree with a respected member
of the field – that actually happens a lot).
I think one reason this sentence rang like a bell for me is that I have by no means come to terms with the truth of it…though I’m working on it.
Before I was married, I measured the progress of my life in terms of the aquisition of newer and better things.
Since my marriage, I am finding that my rule of measure has been changing. There is still that part of me that is a rampant consumer, but there are also new values in place that value security, having the ability to deal with an unplanned emergency, having the resources to deal with a lay-off, etc.
I think that’s part of love, when you place someone else’s long-term happiness and security over your own short-term gratification.
It’s an excellent book…I read most of it in a day. Some of his points I agree with, and some I don’t, but it’s definitely a must-read for those who value freedom of inquiry.
Interesting quote. The sentence structure reminds me a little of the old Kahlil Gibran writings, or better, the take-off on it “The Profit” by “Kellogg Albran,” with “mystical, hard-to-understand drawings.” Wish I still had my copy - it was hilarious.
Well, it’s the last sentence in a paragraph. I am posting it out of context because I felt its meaning was deeper (at least to me) than anything else in that paragraph. Not that it was a bad paragraph, but that sentence is outstanding precisely because it is so true, irregardless of context.
All my own opinion, of course: you mileage may vary, do not eat, there are no consumer-repairable parts, may cause indigestion, do not inhale, may cause dizziness or tired eyes, yada yada yada…
I bought the book some 30 years ago and misplaced it or discarded it a few years later, so I’m surprised I wasn’t further off the mark than I was! Yikes! I wouldn’t pay $12.00 for it. It’s just a silly little take-off thing, good for a laugh.
There are books which have struck me like a lightning bolt. Experience has shown me that other people do not regard them in the the same way. They will trigger a chain of thought if you are in a particular frame of mind, in a certain set of circumstances. Otherwise, they are just a good read. Sometimes they are not even that.
I’m glad you had the sensation with your book, Peeplj.
I’m sorry that it doesn’t communicate, but that’s life.
It’s not worth saying much more than “I really enjoyed that book, and I think you will too.”