Top 25 Posters (Quantity) as of April 28, 2005

[I.D.10-t]

is

[I.D.10-t]

going

[I.D.10-t]

Higher!

[Lorenzo]

Somehow, I feel you’re not finished. Oh darn! I didn’t interrupt it.

[I.D.10-t]

@Lorenzo

Somehow, I feel you’re not finished. Oh darn! I didn’t interrupt it.

[I.D.10-t]

Better

[I.D.10-t]

luck

[I.D.10-t]

next

[I.D.10-t]

time!

[rh1]

@Doug_Tipple

Can anyone remember life before the internet? I was reading books, which I hardly do anymore, I am sorry to say.

excellent point. if i’d applied the keystrokes i’ve expended in various discussion groups to the box, i’d easily have twice the number of tunes i have now. not that i dislike the discussions, it’s fun to participate and all, but i shouldn’t be surprised with my lack of musical progress.

[emmline]

Barely hanging on at 25!
I feel like a bottom dweller on American Idol!

[Bloomfield]

@emmline

Barely hanging on at 25!
I feel like a bottom dweller on American Idol!

It’s not any sunnier near the top, trust me.

[Tony]

I’m on hiatus… at least for now

[Bloomfield]

@Doug_Tipple

I’d like to say that just a smile icon does not qualitfy as a legitimate post. These kind of frivolous posts should then be deducted from the final tally.

Yes, that is the way it actually works.

http://chiffboard.mati.ca/viewtopic.php?t=7967&highlight=postcount

(note particularly the post count poem by Walden.)

[burnsbyrne]

@Tony

I’m on hiatus… at least for now

Funny you should say that. My doctor recently told me that my hiatus is herniated.
Mike

[Walden]

@DaleWisely

1. jim stone 6530
2. Nanohedron 5696
3. Bloomfield 5149
4. glauber 4931
5. Walden 4843

Is the implication here that the quality of my posts is way below the quantity? Well, mayhaps there’s truth to it. Nearly three years ago someone said, “If we don’t count fluff, Walden only has seven actual posts…”

[Dale]

@Walden

@DaleWisely

1. jim stone 6530
2. Nanohedron 5696
3. Bloomfield 5149
4. glauber 4931
5. Walden 4843

Is the implication here that the quality of my posts is way below the quantity? Well, mayhaps there’s truth to it. Nearly three years ago someone said, “If we don’t count fluff, Walden only has seven actual posts…”

But, it’s the highest quality fluff. And the seven actual posts are fabulous.

[Jack]

@Lorenzo

Cranberry deleted the contents of about the first 1500 posts (just left a period)—but which still show up as part of the totals. So really, Cranberry’s post count total should only be around 3201.

Indeed. That’s because I’m shady. You can just ask Stacy.

See, I am also Flyingcursor, emmline, izzarina, Martin Milner, avanutria, Nanohedron, and Bloomfield, so I have the most post counts. I just post with different screen names so I can pretend I have a real life.

[Nanohedron]

This is embarrassing.

[MurphyStout]

This reminds me of that saying that you’ll never hear anything if you’re talking all the time.

My list would go something like this’

1. Azalin
2. Eldarion
3. Feadogin
4. StevieJ
5. Brad Hurley
6. Peter Laban
7. Martin Milner
8. Susnfx
9. Jack Gilder (cause I love the fact that there is a liberal counter for Jim Stone on the forums)
10. cskinner
11. Royce or whatever he calls himself these days.
12. ChrisLaughlin

I’ll stop there… bear in mind these aren’t necesarily my favorite people, just my favorite posters. And only 2 of them make the top 25, what a pity.