Three Fish Chowder: A Review

Happy New Year, Everybody!

In the grand Chiff and Fipple Tradition, it is my honor to post a review of a product that most of you probably have not tried. My experience with chowders is somewhat limited, but here are my impressions.

Let me start by saying that I personally throw in with any recipe that starts with bacon fat and butter. I was not disappointed.

I made the chowder in my new kitchen, with the help of one assistant (hi colin!)

Dale’s recipe was very easy to follow, and I appreciated the flexibility (By the way, Dale got one thing right on the money: When in doubt, add more half and half). All of the ingredients were readily available from the local grocery store.

Some slight tweeking was necessary to suit the local climate. We used salmon instead of clams. We also used a good deal more sea food than the recipe called for, although this was only semi-intentional. You see, we halved the recipe but forgot to halve the crab; by the time we got to the shrimp and salmon we said to heck with it, or words to that affect, and threw it all in. Instead of pepper sauce, we used ground red pepper.

This is a fairly high-maintanence recipe, by the way: don’t plan on plopping the pot of the stove and getting back to your TV program. It requires a lot of stirring to avoid scorching the bottom.

The taste is very creamy and rich, with a good spiciness. The crab sort of disappeared into the mix as it cooked, adding its subtle flavor to the broth. The bacon and salmon complimented each other nicely, and the shrimp added a nice texture. The potatoes filled it out nicely, and didn’t come apart during cooking.

While most of the guests Friday night were too strung out from the road to be of much use as taste-testers, the chowder recieved rave reviews from everyone at Saturday’s party.

Good stuff. Highly recommended. In fact, I’m having it (again) for dinner this evening.

Thanks, Dale!
Tom

I don’t like it. It’s too quiet around here. 80 lurkers and no reactions. There must be something wrong. An Undisputed Chowder just doesn’t seem in character these days. Surely somebody at least got a bad dose of salmonella (the well-known blues whistler) from a duff consignment of clams. Or has their apartment strewn with cutie-poo after the cat got at the leftovers the next day.

[ This Message was edited by: Roger O’Keeffe on 2003-01-02 15:48 ]

Well, my immediate reaction on reading Badger’s post was to copy it and send it to my guitar-playing pal who has recently become a born-again cook. (It’s all Alton Brown and “Good Eats”'s fault.)

We agree with Julia Child on this one–butter is good (in moderation).

M

I made this chowder tonight, and here are my thoughts:

It’s a fine chowder..very “chowdery” tasting. I don’t like substituting bacon for salt pork..luckily, my grocery store carries salt pork, and a quarter pound of it is only like 30 cents. Bacon’s more expensive and is really a weak substitution imho, but I guess will do in a pinch. :slight_smile:

If you sift the flour into the butter/pork fat/onion base and stir while you sift in, it’ll help you get a really smooth roux, a must for a smooth chowder.

If you use low-sodium chicken broth (as I do) you’ll need to salt to taste after adding the roux. I prefer this, as it allows me to quality control the salt level better.

I used 2 lbs of shrimp (1 lb salad shrimp, 1 lb coctail shrimp) and 3 cans of minced clams. My wife’s not a big clam texture fan, but the minced clams added a nice flavor without too much overt clam texture.

The flavor is creamy and rich, though the folks around here prefer without hot sauce, so I leave it out so that it can be seasoned to taste per bowl.

I prefer using heavy cream instead of half-and-half. The flavor bang for the buck is better, in my opinion.

All in all, it got great reviews around here. Next time around, I may experiment by adding some creamed corn.