Pub Radio Twin Cities Minnesota

If anyone has a cell phone handy and maybe a radio Sunday, 6 November 2005, tune into KSTP AM 1500 (Talk Radio) and contribute to “The Next Big Thing.” Our friend Royce will be proving that he isn’t for two hours between 2 and 4 PM. (Prime nap time.)

Anyone particularly playing at a band practice or house session or pub is encouraged to call in and do a live report from the field and play a tune or two. You can also contribute to two hours of amateur babble and irresponsible speculation about anything you’d talk about in the pub on Sunday anyway.

Call blind 2-4 central daylight savings time even if you can’t hear it and you can listen on line and still contribute. 651-646-8255 in the metro, 1-877-615-1500 toll free outstate and out of state.

The station can be picked up around the region. I know I’ll be tuned in…

Who,s Royce ???

RORY

Ancient history. Previous incarnation of knowledgable piper who had a penchant for posting in vitriolic terms. Since replaced more civil incarnations.

djm

Had to miss the broadcast, unfortunately. Heard it was quite entertaining. D.E.B.'s wife did a pub crawl roving report as part of the show’s concept and reported back with her assessments. Keegan’s was as dead as a crypt, for example. I was at the Dubliner helping out during a “Celtic Shopping” (horrid term) event, and Donald tried to engage what wit I had via his wife’s cellphone, but it was noisy and all I could do was say scintillating things like, “Huh?” and “What?” and “Sorry, it’s noisy. Can’t hear you very well.”

I’m sure I rocked the house.

Ah right ,was he the chap that caused the great lockout of (the last one )whenever ,It just hasn,t been the same since !!


RORY

Oh dear. :laughing: :laughing: I’m glad I don’t have a radio show.

Oh, what is a “Celtic Shopping” event?

Oh, what is a “Celtic Shopping” event?


Uhhhh…a trip tp Walmart???

Heh. It’s a yearly get-together of the local artisans, do-dad vendors and booksellers of the local Irish-American community. They descend on the Dubliner with their wares and hope that shoppers will make their time worthwhile. There are also scheduled musical performances during the event, but nothing I’d want to be associated with. Serious players don’t get started until the end when a session gets going. Then things start cookin’.

Oh, dear. I committed a pleonasm: needlessly using “local” twice in the same sentence. I’m losing it.

Well, the artisans and the booksellers might not both have been local. Do-dad vendors, I just can’t stand do-dads.

pleonasm
Pleonasm is the use of more words than necessary to express an idea. The word comes originally from Greek πλεονασμóς pleonasmos (“excess”).


Pleonasm usage
Often pleonasm is understood to mean an excess word or phrase which is unnecessary, clichéd, or wrong. But a pleonasm can also be simply an unremarkable use of idiom. It can even aid in achieving a particular linguistic effect, be it social, poetic, or literary. In other words, pleonasm sometimes serves the same function as rhetorical repetition – it reinforces a point, and makes the writing clearer and easier to understand.

In addition, pleonasms can serve purposes external to meaning. For example, a speaker who is overly terse is often interpreted as lacking ease or grace. This is because, in spoken language, sentences are spontaneously created without the benefit of going back and editing. The restriction on the ability to plan often creates much redundancy. In written language, removing words that aren’t strictly necessary can sometimes make writing seem stilted or awkward, especially if the words are cut from an idiomatic expression.

Some pleonastic phrases are part of a language’s idiom, like “safe haven” and “tuna fish” in English. They are so common that their use is unremarkable, although in many cases the redundancy can be dropped with no loss of meaning.

Pleonastic phrases like “off of” are common in spoken or informal written English, such as when used in a phrase like “keep the cat off of the couch”, for instance. In a satellite-framed language like English, verb phrases containing particles that denote direction of motion are so frequent that even when such a particle is pleonastic, it seems natural to include it.

On the other hand, as is the case with any literary or rhetorical effect, excessive use of pleonasm can weaken writing or speech. Too many words can distract from the content. Writers who want to conceal a thought or a purpose sometimes obscure their meaning with an onslaught of verbiage. William Strunk Jr. argued for conciseness in The Elements of Style, (1918):

“Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts. This requires not that the writer make all his sentences short, or that he avoid all detail and treat his subjects only in outline, but that every word tell.”

And there was a lot more. That phrase “In a satellite-framed language like English” seems strange.