Parental grace under extraordinary pressure

Jimmy Mizen’s dad plea to stop ‘angry Britain’
The dad of murdered teenager Jimmy Mizen demanded an end to “angry Britain” yesterday as his son’s killer was jailed for life.

In a rallying cry to decent people, Barry Mizen said the country was rapidly losing its civility and called for a return to values based on manners and kindness.

Showing extraordinary dignity, she vowed not to be overcome with anger over Jimmy’s death.

Referring to Fahri, she said: "I feel for the parents of this boy.

“That’s their child, they held that boy in their arms as a baby. They must be in pain.”

This UK story has me pondering something I’ve long had an interest in - parents, or more generally family members who resist what can be immense media and social pressure to fall into anger or ‘victimism’ in the wake of the murder of a loved one.

For me, the prototype of this kind of grace was the extraordinary gesture of the family of Jason Lang, a 17 year old kid from alberta shot in a (probably copycat) school shooting 8 days after Columbine.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/taber/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._R._Myers_High_School_shooting

The shooter was a 14 year old with, like so many school shooters, a history as the target of a lot of bullying, but no one says that the boy he shot was among the bullies. He was a well liked and apparrently kind preacher’s kid who was among the first the shooter saw when he entered the school.

What struck me then, however, was the fact that the dead kids parents publicly forgave their son’s murderer very soon after the killing, and long before the trial.

This is something that almost never happens, in my experience. This was a killing committed by a ‘youth’ in Canada’s province that is ‘toughest’ on youth crime. During the trial, the prosecution applied (as the law here allows) to have the case transferred to adult court, where offenders go to adult jail (to improve the sex lives of the other prisoners, I’ve always presumed) and can be sentenced to life instead of the juvie max, (which was then three years, I think, but which since has been raised to a touch less than then years, largely to satisfy Alberta). The application was refused, btw.

All the press was filled with stories about the scourge of youth crime, and was ready for some mad as hell quotes from the Lang family; when the case came to trial, the family would have been invited to make victim impact statements, which are supposed to ‘inform’ the judge prior to sentencing, and whose operating logic is all about anger and the desire for vengeance.

Which they pointedly refused to make. Instead, the Lang family issued a statement that has struck me ever since as being filled with grace. They spoke of their loss, but refused to blame the shooter. As far as they were concerned, he too was a victim who would have his own journey to make, and they wished him the best with it.

Sadly, the ten years since have erased this from the net, at least for those without a Lexus-nexus subscription, but here’s a story from a little later:

http://www.peak.sfu.ca/the-peak/2000-1/issue4/forgiveness.html

There was a weighty silence and some tears shed in the East Gym Wednesday morning as a hundred SFU students listened to Rev. Lang describe the afternoon of the shooting. "You could never have convinced me that in a town of 7,000 people, in a high school of 450 students, that my son could’ve been shot. I can’t begin to tell you about the pain of that moment.

“I prayed for the young man who had shot my son, I forgave him, and I asked the community to forgive him.”

Rev. Lang spoke about the alienation experienced by many youth today, including the teenager who shot his son. He emphasized a need to “break down the walls that separate us,” pointing out that “in every high school, every university and college, there are people hurting.”

He says his message has a particular impact on high school students, who “are very aware of the abuse that goes on, with kids getting picked on. It’s an issue that’s really touching them personally.”

Instead of blaming gun control laws or the media, Rev. Lang attributes acts of violence like his son’s murder to "a diminishing of what it means to be a person.

The reverend stated several times that it was through his strong Christian faith that he was able to forgive his son’s murderer. “I am so blessed to be able to be free from the anger and bitterness, but really I had no option but to forgive.”

Thanks for this. There is a scattering of people in the US who are family members of murder victims who practice forgiveness of their loved ones’ murderers and who work against the death penalty for them. In fact, there are two national groups of such people. But, it certainly is uncommon.

There is also the different possible interpretation that the parents’ personal pride in their loudly professed beliefs bring them to broadcast this kind of response in order to maintain their own self-image. Not that it matters, as none of this addresses the social ills that they claim are the stem of the problem. Nothing changes. Nothing gets fixed.

djm

Perhaps not, but Dale Lang didn’t get broken by his son’s death.

~~

But to be slighly less flippant, I got fixed. Ten years ago, born-again Christians from Alberta were making a lot of waves in Canadian politics, espousing positions which did not, to me, seem to be at all the kind of views that flattered the faith of their espousers. They seemed harsh, both unloving and unforgiving, and not at all the kind of christianity I respected.

But Dale Lang blew my prejudice out of the water; he was the first bible-belt fundamentalist I’d heard of who said what I’d always hoped that if ever tested I’d have had the grace to say, or better yet, think. That was the kind of Christian I thought worthy of the name, and he’s been a mild personal hero of mine ever since. As well as a reminder not to judge people by who they vote for.

Not that I actually know who Rev. Lang votes for, but his province as a whole has voted wall-to-wall conservative since the depression.

The last officer that was killed on duty here was Kevin Crayon. He was killed in August of 2000.

He had responded to a call that there was a car trying to run over people in a convenience store parking lot. When he arrived, he found a 12 year old boy driving (this was at 1am in the morning on a school night) the car. He reached into the car window (probably to turn off the car) and was tangled up in it, and the kid took off down the street.

Somehow, Kevin managed to get his service revolver loose and shot the driver. He “fell off” the car after being dragged for over 1000 feet and the car ran over him and killed him.

The kid crashed the car, managed to get to his home, and died there.


Kevin’s mother and stepdad paid for the funeral for the 12 year old, and he was buried in the same plot as Kevin.

It seems awfully condescending to me. Who is he to be forgiving anyone else?

The big V is such a personal choice.

djm

This guy is the same.
He is turning the loss of his son into something positive, and if he gets only one kid to leave a gang or think twice about carrying a knife, his efforts will have been worth it.

Ignore the tinkly piano and fawning celebs in this clip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sX2uUXL0gnM&feature=related

Mukade