On 2002-07-31 00:40, JohnPalmer wrote:
Work on your technique.
Oh, you’re a cruel man, John. Didn’t you realize that what I wanted to hear was that it’s the whistle’s problem not mine? (Bless you, Steve!) 
Just kidding, of course.
I worked on the passage quite a bit, John, before ever posting about it. I am pretty sure that my technique is clean on that particular measure and that I cover the holes on the d-pedal (it’s really a c, but xxx xxx or oxx xxx fingering on the c-whistle).
Last night I worked on it some more and what I did was trying to tongue the pedal. That’s quite tricky to do at first. For me at least, and I blame my classical start into music for it, which causes me to instinctively favor ta-ya ta-ya ta-ya ta-ya over ya-Ta ya-Ta ya-Ta ya-Ta.
I got it down eventually but the improvement was not all that significant at speed unless I really de-emphasized the pedal tone and made it really staccato, which takes the flow out of the passage. And even so it’s still mucky.
Steve,
~f3 a bfaf (my favourite)
fdAd bfaf
fd (3ddd bfaf
fd ~d2 bfaf
fd (3Bc#d bfaf (don’t give me a hard time about the c# OK)
I like the idea of using variations (which I guess I have been doing in sessions, with the uninspired .f2.a2.b2.f2, but what you’re suggesting there looks a lot more interesting. I love my office colleagues, of course, but they can really interfere with your whistling, I tell you. I’ll try all your suggestions tonight.
About the C#: you haven’t forgotten, eh? In a triplet like that I guess it’s all right, gives it a pipesy feeling. 
\
/bloomfield
[ This Message was edited by: Bloomfield on 2002-07-31 09:39 ]