Irish Govt clears way for motorway through Tara

Decision ‘a betrayal of Celtic heritage’ was one of the milder reactions when the Irish Government gave the go ahead for the controversial M3 motorway.
Despite widespread protests and strong cases made foran alternative route for the road, the govt is pressing ahead with the motorway that will destroy the integrity of the archeological landscape around the hill of Tara.


Roche outlines conditions for controversial M3 road
12:53 The Minister for the Environment Dick Roche has cleared the way for the National Roads Authority to begin building the controversial M3 motorway through the Tara-Skryne valley. The direction from Mr Roche clears the way for the road to be built along the proposed current route. Speaking at a press conference in Dublin Mr Roche detailed a series of digs that must be carried out by Meath County Council between Dunshaughlin and Navan.

Some information on one of the many sites protesting the plan, here</a](http://www.protect-tara.org/">here</a)>

Just when you thought the British and American Governments had cornered the market in stupidity…

It has been posted here several times before but there’s still the petion to sign in protest:

http://www.petitiononline.com/Temair/petition.html

It is awful to ruin beautiful places and also to mess up the few traces there are of ancient peoples. We have done a good job of it here.

The link to the archaeology department led to a lot of really interesting aerial photographs. The crop circles—places where the crops are a slightly different color because they are growing on top of different stone—show how the whole area is covered with traces of these people.

Also, a picture at one of the links showing the great road going past Stonehenge was very powerful.

Here is an editorial by Colm Toibin from one of those links:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/25/opinion/25toibin.html?ex=1272081600&en=8ab6211920969073&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss

Hey, there aren’t that many signatures there. Come on, folks. Give it some thought.

I don’t sign just anything, but a fairly short time of reading convinces me that this is a bad idea.

If I am not aware of all the facts, at the very worst signing the petition might make them examine the alternate route proposal more carefully. There is no harm to come from delay in this case.

This irresponsibility is extremely disappointing. I got the impression there is a lot of dissent for many things the Irish government is doing after listening to chat shows on the radio while I was in Ireland last November. But I’m not surprised that the same government who allows US military planes to use Shannon Airport would allow this to happen as well.

jGilder wrote:
“But I’m not surprised that the same government who allows US military planes to use Shannon Airport would allow this to happen as well.”

so does Germany, and the UK, and Turkey, and Japan, and many municipalities in the US, and …

And, quite frankly, I don’t see the point of your comment.

Missy

It’s poor judgment… in all those cases.

(Sorry Peter, I’m not hijacking your thread. I’m hoping this bit ends here. If anyone wishes to discuss this further, please start a new thread.)

Missy, there’s a huge difference. Unlike Germany,Turkey and the other countries you mention, Ireland is a NEUTRAL country and therefore should have no involvement in any war effort. Few people here wanted the US troops, weapons and on occasion illegal prisoners stopping in Shannon.

Back on topic now please.

Recently, our newspaper ran a story about projects that were proposed but never carried out in the last six or seven decades. One included a ROLLER COASTER on the Golden Gate Bridge cables! But others included various freeways (your motorways) where we now have four-lane boulevards or “urban arterials.”

The point is, that with good judgement and enough public outcry, things CAN be stopped. I don’t know about Ireland, but we have stopped them here, before, no matter what cynics say about corporate power.

Very best of luck.

This is a terrible tragedy. One of the worst parts, to me, is that I met several people in Ireland who said they honestly didn’t care about Tara because in their view the motorway was more important.

I wonder what those people will say when the tourism industry collapses after all the ancient monuments in the country have been destroyed to build highways.

Justine

Few people will dispute that infrastructure is needed to take the pressure off places like Kells. The volumes of heavy traffic trying to squeeze through small towns is atrocious. But good arguments have been made to move the route of the M3 to a different location.

I, for one, think it shows the same kind of disregard for history, ecology and public opinion as the lumber crap in Alaska. I hope the people can stop it.

I was under the impression that this meant major excavation would be taking place in the area now so that anything of interest could be discovered before the construction. I’m not excusing the building of the road in by the Hill, just thought that I had heard Irish archeologists were getting pretty excited about it.

Archeologists are excited, incensed maybe the better word, because of the theat to the integrity of the most important archeological landscape of the island. Few would be excited because they have an outlook on one or two years of work before the sites they are to excavate are being destroyed forever.


Letter to the editor, The Irish Times, Signed Internationally By Thirty Academics, 23.02.04
Madam,

The Hill of Tara constitutes the heart and soul of Ireland. Our ceremonial and mythical capital, its very name invokes the spirit and mystique of our people, and is instantly recognisable worldwide.

An Bord Pleanála’s recent approval of the Government’s scheme to divide the Tara/Skryne valley with the M3 motorway spells out a massive national and international tragedy that must be averted.

This narrow valley is one of the most culturally and archaeologically significant places in the world. Many monuments predate the Egyptian pyramids. The chamber within Tara’s Mound of the Hostages is perfectly aligned with the full moon of Lughnasa and the rising sun of Samhain and Imbolg.

The Hill of Tara has been a sanctuary for every generation since. It is precisely because it has remained intact, unlike many comparable Continental sites, that it holds a special key to understanding the continuous progression of European civilisation.

We are only just beginning to understand and appreciate how the Mound relates to the hundreds of other monuments in this archaeological complex, many of which will be destroyed if the valley is sliced in two.

The Hill of Skryne, containing the 12th-century Skryne Castle, is also a national monument and an early religious and ritual centre.

Both Tara and Skryne are part of the same cultural and natural landscape of The Boyne Valley and cannot be separated from the River Boyne, or from each other.

Let us be clear: excavation is destruction, not “preservation” in the true sense. Moreover, serious questions have now been raised in the Dáil as to the standard of “preservation by record”, with over 1,500 excavation reports currently missing.

Every effort should be made to preserve national monuments in situ, according to stated Government policy, as well as the Council of Europe’s Valetta Convention (The European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage), to which Ireland is a signatory.

The Convention Concerning the Protection of World Cultural and Natural Heritage, signed by Ireland in Paris, in 1972, resolved to protect parts of the cultural or natural heritage that are of outstanding universal value and therefore need to be preserved as part of the world heritage of mankind as a whole.

Tara warrants UNESCO protection, if ever an Irish site did. We call on the Government, particularly the Taoiseach, the Minister for Transport and the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government to review this decision and choose one of the many intelligent options that are still available. These include: improving the existing N3, as per the original advertised scheme; re-opening the Navan-Dublin railway line, which is widely supported in the locality; or simply moving the M3 away from this delicate archaeological landscape. In the alternative, we ask our public servants to place these viable options before the Irish nation, openly and democratically, and let Irish taxpayers decide for themselves if their money should be spent destroying this singular element of Irish identity.

  • Yours, etc.,

Dr EDEL BHREATHNACH, Mícheál Ó Cléirigh Institute, University College, Dublin;
FRANCIS JOHN BYRNE, Early Irish Historian;
NICHOLAS CANNY, Department of History, University College, Galway;
MÁIREAD CAREW, Archaeologist and writer;
PROF THOMAS CHARLES-EDWARDS, Faculty of Modern History, Oxford University;
JULITTA CLANCY MBE, Meath Archaeological and Historical Society;
Prof THOMAS OWEN CLANCY, Department of Celtic, University of Glasgow;
Dr HOWARD CLARKE, School of History, University College, Dublin;
Dr MARK CLINTON, Archaeologist and writer;
Prof CHARLIE DOHERTY, Department of History, University College, Dublin;
Dr SEÁN DUFFY, FTCD, Department of History, Trinity College, Dublin;
MÁIRE HERBERT, Department of Old Irish, University College, Cork;
Prof BART JASKI, Celtic Department, University of Utrecht;
Dr RAIMUND KARL, Department of History and Welsh History, University of Wales, Bangor;
Prof MÍCHEÁL MAC CRAITH, Department of Modern Irish, NUI, Galway;
Prof KIM McCONE, Department of Medieval Irish Studies, NUI Maynooth;
Prof NEIL MCLEOD, Murdoch University, Australia;
Prof JOSEPH NAGY, Department of English, University of California, Los Angeles;
Dr MUIREANN NÍ BHROLCHÁIN, Department of Medieval Irish Studies, NUI Maynooth;
Dr MÁIRE NÍ NEACHTAIN, Department of Irish, University of Limerick;
KENNETH NICHOLS, Retired statutory lecturer, University College, Cork;
Prof TOMÁS Ó CATHASAIGH, Irish Studies, Harvard University;
DONNCHADH Ó CORRÁIN, Department of History, University College, Cork;
DÁIBHÍ Ó CRÓINÍN, Department of History, NUI Galway;
VINCENT SALAFIA, Save Tara/Skryne Valley Campaign, PO Box 30, Tara, Co Meath;
Prof RUAIRI Ó hUIGINN, Department of Modern Irish, NUI Maynooth;
Prof ALFRED SMYTH, Chair of Medieval History, Canterbury University;
PÁDRAIGÍN RIGGS, Department of Modern Irish, University College, Cork;
Dr NANCY STENSON, Department of Linguistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis;
Rev Dr R. STIEFEL, University of New Hampshire.

Beware before you dig the mound
It is bound to bleed
the ground around …

I think the Irish government is on a winner.

They should use the fame of Tara to build a service area/souvenir village right next to the hill. A couple of fast-food restaurants, a children’s play area, and shops selling celt-o-goods and chunks of Tara turf. Of course, all of the staff would wear leprechaun uniforms, and they could pay a local nun to have a vision of the Virgin Mary in the car park. Holy mineral water and blessed key holders always sell well.

Then, once a year they could hold the Tara Renaissance Festival, and allow people in poorly made Braveheart kilts and buxom wench costumes to run all over the hill banging bodhrans, waving plastic swords and screaming “aye” and “forsooth.”

Stop the Tara motorway? Are you crazy? I say build four extra lanes.

Mukade

Mukade, if you ever get out of the satire business, I bet there is work awaiting you for any number of corporate interests! :laughing: