The city paid to have part of the hill taken down for fill at a Sam’s Club.
I find this to be the telling detail - It’s on that says it all, really, & really sums up the deep well of understanding and respect that must underlie Alabamans’ attitudes toward scholarship, native heritage, and the past.
This is why they removed the Creeks, the Chickasaws, the Seminoles, the Choctaws, and the Cherokees. These people just knew they could make better use of the land.
Oklahoma had to make strict laws about it after a mining company blasted one of the most important mound sites in the Southern United States, at Spiro, Oklahoma, looting the treasures and leaving remains scattered over the ground. The WPA then excavated it in a more scientific manner, and now it’s a state park.
It reminds me of the Seven Sisters, a prehistoric barrow near my parent’s home in England.
Most of these places are scheduled in the UK.
Doesn’t the US have provisions to protect ancient monuments?
I read a short story once about an Indian tribe that had all kinds of horrible things happen to them, and it turned out they had built their burial ground…on another Indian burial ground..
Though my home state has its problems, it would not do that. A single burial site often results in a protected area, usually marked by boulders to block any kind of vehicle traffic and such. I find it incredible in 2009 that this would happen…